POLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -320.9% compared to Polar Power, Inc.'s net margin of -19.45%. Polar Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -116.5% beat Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1469.51%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.67 which suggests that it could grow by 233.33%. Given that Polar Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Flux Power Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Polar Power, Inc. is more attractive than Flux Power Holdings, Inc..

Polar Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.727, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.677%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polar Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polar Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.2M. Polar Power, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Polar Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polar Power, Inc. is 0.67x versus 0.45x for Flux Power Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lightbridge Corp. has a net margin of -320.9% compared to Polar Power, Inc.'s net margin of --. Polar Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -116.5% beat Lightbridge Corp.'s return on equity of -21.74%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1469.51%. On the other hand Lightbridge Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 761.24%. Given that Polar Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lightbridge Corp., analysts believe Polar Power, Inc. is more attractive than Lightbridge Corp..

Polar Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lightbridge Corp. has a beta of 1.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.298%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lightbridge Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polar Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lightbridge Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polar Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are larger than Lightbridge Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Polar Power, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M is higher than Lightbridge Corp.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Polar Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lightbridge Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polar Power, Inc. is 0.67x versus 1,560.44x for Lightbridge Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moog, Inc. has a net margin of -320.9% compared to Polar Power, Inc.'s net margin of 6.14%. Polar Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -116.5% beat Moog, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.37%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1469.51%. On the other hand Moog, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $243.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.4%. Given that Polar Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Moog, Inc., analysts believe Polar Power, Inc. is more attractive than Moog, Inc..

Polar Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moog, Inc. has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.958%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Moog, Inc. offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Polar Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moog, Inc. pays out 15.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Moog, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Polar Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Moog, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Polar Power, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than Moog, Inc.'s net income of $64.4M. Notably, Polar Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Moog, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polar Power, Inc. is 0.67x versus 1.95x for Moog, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -320.9% compared to Polar Power, Inc.'s net margin of --. Polar Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -116.5% beat NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.37%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1469.51%. On the other hand NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.67 which suggests that it could grow by 37.7%. Given that Polar Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc., analysts believe Polar Power, Inc. is more attractive than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc..

Polar Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polar Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polar Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are larger than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Polar Power, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M is higher than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$7.6M. Notably, Polar Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polar Power, Inc. is 0.67x versus -- for NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.