POLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 0.27% compared to Polar Power's net margin of 3.86%. Polar Power's return on equity of -38.49% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Polar Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 957.4%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -7.19%. Given that Polar Power has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Polar Power is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

Polar Power has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.948% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.339%.

Polar Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polar Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polar Power quarterly revenues are $4.9M, which are smaller than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Polar Power's net income of $13K is lower than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Polar Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 3.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polar Power is 0.53x versus 0.65x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a net margin of 0.27% compared to Polar Power's net margin of 15.31%. Polar Power's return on equity of -38.49% beat Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 15.95%.

Polar Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 957.4%. On the other hand Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -13.56%. Given that Polar Power has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics, analysts believe Polar Power is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.

Polar Power has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.948% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of 0.145, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.51%.

Polar Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Polar Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays out 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Polar Power quarterly revenues are $4.9M, which are smaller than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues of $10.4M. Polar Power's net income of $13K is lower than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Polar Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's PE ratio is 11.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polar Power is 0.53x versus 1.83x for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 0.27% compared to Polar Power's net margin of -82.25%. Polar Power's return on equity of -38.49% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

Polar Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 957.4%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9615303.85%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Polar Power, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Polar Power.

Polar Power has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.948% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.435, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 243.524%.

Polar Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polar Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

Polar Power quarterly revenues are $4.9M, which are smaller than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Polar Power's net income of $13K is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Polar Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polar Power is 0.53x versus 0.03x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stardust Power has a net margin of 0.27% compared to Polar Power's net margin of --. Polar Power's return on equity of -38.49% beat Stardust Power's return on equity of --.

Polar Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 957.4%. On the other hand Stardust Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 279.4%. Given that Polar Power has higher upside potential than Stardust Power, analysts believe Polar Power is more attractive than Stardust Power.

Polar Power has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.948% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stardust Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Polar Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stardust Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polar Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stardust Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polar Power quarterly revenues are $4.9M, which are larger than Stardust Power quarterly revenues of --. Polar Power's net income of $13K is higher than Stardust Power's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Polar Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stardust Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polar Power is 0.53x versus -- for Stardust Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.