POLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a net margin of -320.9% compared to Polar Power, Inc.'s net margin of 0.92%. Polar Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -116.5% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1771.66%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polar Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Polar Power, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

Polar Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.21%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Polar Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays out 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Polar Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Polar Power, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K. Notably, Polar Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polar Power, Inc. is 0.56x versus 0.52x for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -320.9% compared to Polar Power, Inc.'s net margin of -19.45%. Polar Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -116.5% beat Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1771.66%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.67 which suggests that it could grow by 304.76%. Given that Polar Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Flux Power Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Polar Power, Inc. is more attractive than Flux Power Holdings, Inc..

Polar Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.727, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.677%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polar Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polar Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.2M. Polar Power, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M is lower than Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Polar Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polar Power, Inc. is 0.56x versus 0.37x for Flux Power Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -320.9% compared to Polar Power, Inc.'s net margin of --. Polar Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -116.5% beat NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.98%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1771.66%. On the other hand NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.67 which suggests that it could grow by 54.02%. Given that Polar Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc., analysts believe Polar Power, Inc. is more attractive than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc..

Polar Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polar Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polar Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are larger than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Polar Power, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M is higher than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$8.1M. Notably, Polar Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polar Power, Inc. is 0.56x versus -- for NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power Corp. has a net margin of -320.9% compared to Polar Power, Inc.'s net margin of -6462.58%. Polar Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -116.5% beat NuScale Power Corp.'s return on equity of -194.62%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1771.66%. On the other hand NuScale Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $35.50 which suggests that it could grow by 120.77%. Given that Polar Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than NuScale Power Corp., analysts believe Polar Power, Inc. is more attractive than NuScale Power Corp..

Polar Power, Inc. has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.09% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Polar Power, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuScale Power Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polar Power, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polar Power, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than NuScale Power Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.2M. Polar Power, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M is higher than NuScale Power Corp.'s net income of -$532.6M. Notably, Polar Power, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NuScale Power Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polar Power, Inc. is 0.56x versus 31.88x for NuScale Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.