PLMJ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

dMY Squared Technology Group has a net margin of -- compared to Plum Acquisition Corp III's net margin of --. Plum Acquisition Corp III's return on equity of -- beat dMY Squared Technology Group's return on equity of --.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand dMY Squared Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Plum Acquisition Corp III has higher upside potential than dMY Squared Technology Group, analysts believe Plum Acquisition Corp III is more attractive than dMY Squared Technology Group.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison dMY Squared Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. dMY Squared Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Plum Acquisition Corp III pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. dMY Squared Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Plum Acquisition Corp III quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than dMY Squared Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Plum Acquisition Corp III's net income of -$1.1M is lower than dMY Squared Technology Group's net income of $145.5K. Notably, Plum Acquisition Corp III's price-to-earnings ratio is 556.00x while dMY Squared Technology Group's PE ratio is 59.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plum Acquisition Corp III is -- versus -- for dMY Squared Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graf Global has a net margin of -- compared to Plum Acquisition Corp III's net margin of --. Plum Acquisition Corp III's return on equity of -- beat Graf Global's return on equity of --.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graf Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Plum Acquisition Corp III has higher upside potential than Graf Global, analysts believe Plum Acquisition Corp III is more attractive than Graf Global.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graf Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graf Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Plum Acquisition Corp III pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graf Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Plum Acquisition Corp III quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graf Global quarterly revenues of --. Plum Acquisition Corp III's net income of -$1.1M is lower than Graf Global's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Plum Acquisition Corp III's price-to-earnings ratio is 556.00x while Graf Global's PE ratio is 98.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plum Acquisition Corp III is -- versus -- for Graf Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coliseum Acquisition has a net margin of -- compared to Plum Acquisition Corp III's net margin of --. Plum Acquisition Corp III's return on equity of -- beat Coliseum Acquisition's return on equity of --.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coliseum Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Plum Acquisition Corp III has higher upside potential than Coliseum Acquisition, analysts believe Plum Acquisition Corp III is more attractive than Coliseum Acquisition.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coliseum Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coliseum Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Plum Acquisition Corp III pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coliseum Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Plum Acquisition Corp III quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coliseum Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. Plum Acquisition Corp III's net income of -$1.1M is lower than Coliseum Acquisition's net income of -$694.9K. Notably, Plum Acquisition Corp III's price-to-earnings ratio is 556.00x while Coliseum Acquisition's PE ratio is 1,108.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plum Acquisition Corp III is -- versus -- for Coliseum Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unusual Machines has a net margin of -- compared to Plum Acquisition Corp III's net margin of -140.03%. Plum Acquisition Corp III's return on equity of -- beat Unusual Machines's return on equity of --.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unusual Machines has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could fall by -14.95%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Plum Acquisition Corp III, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Plum Acquisition Corp III.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unusual Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Plum Acquisition Corp III pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unusual Machines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Plum Acquisition Corp III quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unusual Machines quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Plum Acquisition Corp III's net income of -$1.1M is higher than Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Plum Acquisition Corp III's price-to-earnings ratio is 556.00x while Unusual Machines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plum Acquisition Corp III is -- versus -- for Unusual Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.