OTEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Open Text's net margin of -155.02%. Open Text's return on equity of 15.73% beat A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions's return on equity of -42198.63%.

Open Text has a consensus price target of $32.37, signalling upside risk potential of 19.27%. On the other hand A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 131.21%. Given that A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has higher upside potential than Open Text, analysts believe A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions is more attractive than Open Text.

Open Text has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Open Text has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Open Text pays 57.49% of its earnings as a dividend. A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Open Text's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Open Text quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Open Text's net income of $92.8M is higher than A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Open Text's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.08x while A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Open Text is 1.39x versus 25.79x for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Femto Technologies has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Open Text's net margin of --. Open Text's return on equity of 15.73% beat Femto Technologies's return on equity of --.

Open Text has a consensus price target of $32.37, signalling upside risk potential of 19.27%. On the other hand Femto Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Open Text has higher upside potential than Femto Technologies, analysts believe Open Text is more attractive than Femto Technologies.

Open Text has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Femto Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Open Text has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Femto Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Open Text pays 57.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Femto Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Open Text's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Open Text quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Femto Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Open Text's net income of $92.8M is higher than Femto Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Open Text's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.08x while Femto Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Open Text is 1.39x versus 0.01x for Femto Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Katipult Technology has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Open Text's net margin of 12.8%. Open Text's return on equity of 15.73% beat Katipult Technology's return on equity of --.

Open Text has a consensus price target of $32.37, signalling upside risk potential of 19.27%. On the other hand Katipult Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Open Text has higher upside potential than Katipult Technology, analysts believe Open Text is more attractive than Katipult Technology.

Open Text has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Katipult Technology has a beta of -1.103, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 210.312%.

Open Text has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Katipult Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Open Text pays 57.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Katipult Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Open Text's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Open Text quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Katipult Technology quarterly revenues of $170K. Open Text's net income of $92.8M is higher than Katipult Technology's net income of $307K. Notably, Open Text's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.08x while Katipult Technology's PE ratio is 5.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Open Text is 1.39x versus 0.18x for Katipult Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZenaTech has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Open Text's net margin of -209.85%. Open Text's return on equity of 15.73% beat ZenaTech's return on equity of -9.1%.

Open Text has a consensus price target of $32.37, signalling upside risk potential of 19.27%. On the other hand ZenaTech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Open Text has higher upside potential than ZenaTech, analysts believe Open Text is more attractive than ZenaTech.

Open Text has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZenaTech has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Open Text has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. ZenaTech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Open Text pays 57.49% of its earnings as a dividend. ZenaTech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Open Text's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Open Text quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than ZenaTech quarterly revenues of $240.3K. Open Text's net income of $92.8M is higher than ZenaTech's net income of -$504.2K. Notably, Open Text's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.08x while ZenaTech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Open Text is 1.39x versus 102.98x for ZenaTech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.