NVMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CyberArk Software has a net margin of 25.92% compared to Nova's net margin of -30.89%. Nova's return on equity of 21.77% beat CyberArk Software's return on equity of -7.65%.

Nova has a consensus price target of $283.02, signalling upside risk potential of 53.54%. On the other hand CyberArk Software has an analysts' consensus of $445.80 which suggests that it could grow by 31.89%. Given that Nova has higher upside potential than CyberArk Software, analysts believe Nova is more attractive than CyberArk Software.

Nova has a beta of 1.627, which suggesting that the stock is 62.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CyberArk Software has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.379%.

Nova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CyberArk Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CyberArk Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nova quarterly revenues are $194.8M, which are smaller than CyberArk Software quarterly revenues of $314.4M. Nova's net income of $50.5M is higher than CyberArk Software's net income of -$97.1M. Notably, Nova's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.11x while CyberArk Software's PE ratio is 1,479.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova is 8.79x versus 15.73x for CyberArk Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 25.92% compared to Nova's net margin of 2.9%. Nova's return on equity of 21.77% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity of 5.95%.

Nova has a consensus price target of $283.02, signalling upside risk potential of 53.54%. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985), analysts believe Nova is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985).

Nova has a beta of 1.627, which suggesting that the stock is 62.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.146%.

Nova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Formula Systems (1985) offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Nova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nova quarterly revenues are $194.8M, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) quarterly revenues of $691.5M. Nova's net income of $50.5M is higher than Formula Systems (1985)'s net income of $20.1M. Notably, Nova's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.11x while Formula Systems (1985)'s PE ratio is 17.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova is 8.79x versus 0.51x for Formula Systems (1985). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SatixFy Communications has a net margin of 25.92% compared to Nova's net margin of -539.62%. Nova's return on equity of 21.77% beat SatixFy Communications's return on equity of --.

Nova has a consensus price target of $283.02, signalling upside risk potential of 53.54%. On the other hand SatixFy Communications has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 108.33%. Given that SatixFy Communications has higher upside potential than Nova, analysts believe SatixFy Communications is more attractive than Nova.

Nova has a beta of 1.627, which suggesting that the stock is 62.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SatixFy Communications has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SatixFy Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SatixFy Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nova quarterly revenues are $194.8M, which are larger than SatixFy Communications quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Nova's net income of $50.5M is higher than SatixFy Communications's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Nova's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.11x while SatixFy Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova is 8.79x versus 9.68x for SatixFy Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silynxcom has a net margin of 25.92% compared to Nova's net margin of --. Nova's return on equity of 21.77% beat Silynxcom's return on equity of --.

Nova has a consensus price target of $283.02, signalling upside risk potential of 53.54%. On the other hand Silynxcom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 121%. Given that Silynxcom has higher upside potential than Nova, analysts believe Silynxcom is more attractive than Nova.

Nova has a beta of 1.627, which suggesting that the stock is 62.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nova has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silynxcom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silynxcom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nova quarterly revenues are $194.8M, which are larger than Silynxcom quarterly revenues of --. Nova's net income of $50.5M is higher than Silynxcom's net income of --. Notably, Nova's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.11x while Silynxcom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova is 8.79x versus -- for Silynxcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.