Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
77
NVMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$328.96
Seasonality move
:
7.95%
Day range:
$334.37 - $339.74
52-week range:
$154.00 - $361.32
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
44.11x
P/S ratio:
12.67x
P/B ratio:
8.51x
Volume:
179.4K
Avg. volume:
295.4K
1-year change:
70.42%
Market cap:
$10B
Revenue:
$672.4M
EPS (TTM):
$7.62
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVMI
Nova Ltd.
|
$220.4M | $2.13 | 13.17% | 35.07% | $368.57 |
|
CAMT
Camtek Ltd.
|
$127.1M | $0.81 | 8.36% | 21.96% | $126.75 |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KLAC
KLA Corp.
|
$3.2B | $8.80 | 5.59% | 42.93% | $1,320.96 |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$156.8M | $0.27 | 9.97% | 23.44% | $18.00 |
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $8.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVMI
Nova Ltd.
|
$336.04 | $368.57 | $10B | 44.11x | $0.00 | 0% | 12.67x |
|
CAMT
Camtek Ltd.
|
$108.60 | $126.75 | $5B | 122.88x | $1.33 | 0% | 10.85x |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
$167.02 | -- | $2.6B | 36.59x | $0.50 | 1.46% | 0.91x |
|
KLAC
KLA Corp.
|
$1,243.65 | $1,320.96 | $163.4B | 39.04x | $1.90 | 0.6% | 13.22x |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$26.36 | $18.00 | $1.3B | 32.46x | $0.15 | 2.94% | 2.15x |
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
$1.07 | $8.00 | $5.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.00x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVMI
Nova Ltd.
|
43.01% | 3.134 | 9.32% | 3.91x |
|
CAMT
Camtek Ltd.
|
47.32% | 3.175 | 10.8% | 6.34x |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
45.09% | 1.800 | 21.91% | 0.94x |
|
KLAC
KLA Corp.
|
54.98% | 2.033 | 4.29% | 1.76x |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
25.78% | 0.995 | 10.75% | 1.37x |
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | 0.122 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVMI
Nova Ltd.
|
$127.4M | $63.9M | 17.78% | 24.1% | 28.43% | $74.2M |
|
CAMT
Camtek Ltd.
|
$63M | $31.8M | 5.72% | 8.38% | 25.28% | $64.9M |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
$136.3M | $54.8M | 8.65% | 12.6% | 7.83% | -- |
|
KLAC
KLA Corp.
|
$1.9B | $1.3B | 40.75% | 101.72% | 41.32% | $1.1B |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$44.2M | $17.3M | 12.1% | 15.76% | 10.7% | $19.9M |
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Nova Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NVMI or CAMT?
Camtek Ltd. has a net margin of 27.35% compared to Nova Ltd.'s net margin of -42.21%. Nova Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.1% beat Camtek Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVMINova Ltd.56.73% $1.89 $2.1B CAMTCamtek Ltd.50.04% -$1.16 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About NVMI or CAMT?
Nova Ltd. has a consensus price target of $368.57, signalling upside risk potential of 9.68%. On the other hand Camtek Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $126.75 which suggests that it could grow by 16.71%. Given that Camtek Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nova Ltd., analysts believe Camtek Ltd. is more attractive than Nova Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVMINova Ltd.6 2 0 CAMTCamtek Ltd.7 3 0 -
Is NVMI or CAMT More Risky?
Nova Ltd. has a beta of 1.843, which suggesting that the stock is 84.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Camtek Ltd. has a beta of 1.578, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.789%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVMI or CAMT?
Nova Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Camtek Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share. Nova Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Camtek Ltd. pays out 54.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Camtek Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVMI or CAMT?
Nova Ltd. quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are larger than Camtek Ltd. quarterly revenues of $126M. Nova Ltd.'s net income of $61.4M is higher than Camtek Ltd.'s net income of -$53.2M. Notably, Nova Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.11x while Camtek Ltd.'s PE ratio is 122.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Ltd. is 12.67x versus 10.85x for Camtek Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVMINova Ltd.12.67x 44.11x $224.6M $61.4M CAMTCamtek Ltd.10.85x 122.88x $126M -$53.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns NVMI or FORTY?
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a net margin of 27.35% compared to Nova Ltd.'s net margin of 4.98%. Nova Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.1% beat Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVMINova Ltd.56.73% $1.89 $2.1B FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.19.48% $1.09 $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About NVMI or FORTY?
Nova Ltd. has a consensus price target of $368.57, signalling upside risk potential of 9.68%. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova Ltd. has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., analysts believe Nova Ltd. is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVMINova Ltd.6 2 0 FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NVMI or FORTY More Risky?
Nova Ltd. has a beta of 1.843, which suggesting that the stock is 84.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.377%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVMI or FORTY?
Nova Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Nova Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. pays out 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVMI or FORTY?
Nova Ltd. quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. quarterly revenues of $699.9M. Nova Ltd.'s net income of $61.4M is higher than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net income of $34.9M. Notably, Nova Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.11x while Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 36.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Ltd. is 12.67x versus 0.91x for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVMINova Ltd.12.67x 44.11x $224.6M $61.4M FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.0.91x 36.59x $699.9M $34.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns NVMI or KLAC?
KLA Corp. has a net margin of 27.35% compared to Nova Ltd.'s net margin of 34.93%. Nova Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.1% beat KLA Corp.'s return on equity of 101.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVMINova Ltd.56.73% $1.89 $2.1B KLACKLA Corp.59.43% $8.47 $11.1B -
What do Analysts Say About NVMI or KLAC?
Nova Ltd. has a consensus price target of $368.57, signalling upside risk potential of 9.68%. On the other hand KLA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1,320.96 which suggests that it could grow by 6.22%. Given that Nova Ltd. has higher upside potential than KLA Corp., analysts believe Nova Ltd. is more attractive than KLA Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVMINova Ltd.6 2 0 KLACKLA Corp.10 14 0 -
Is NVMI or KLAC More Risky?
Nova Ltd. has a beta of 1.843, which suggesting that the stock is 84.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA Corp. has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.006%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVMI or KLAC?
Nova Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLA Corp. offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Nova Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp. pays out 22.23% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVMI or KLAC?
Nova Ltd. quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are smaller than KLA Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Nova Ltd.'s net income of $61.4M is lower than KLA Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Nova Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.11x while KLA Corp.'s PE ratio is 39.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Ltd. is 12.67x versus 13.22x for KLA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVMINova Ltd.12.67x 44.11x $224.6M $61.4M KLACKLA Corp.13.22x 39.04x $3.2B $1.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns NVMI or MGIC?
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a net margin of 27.35% compared to Nova Ltd.'s net margin of 7.39%. Nova Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.1% beat Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVMINova Ltd.56.73% $1.89 $2.1B MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.27.35% $0.20 $396.7M -
What do Analysts Say About NVMI or MGIC?
Nova Ltd. has a consensus price target of $368.57, signalling upside risk potential of 9.68%. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could fall by -31.72%. Given that Nova Ltd. has higher upside potential than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd., analysts believe Nova Ltd. is more attractive than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVMINova Ltd.6 2 0 MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is NVMI or MGIC More Risky?
Nova Ltd. has a beta of 1.843, which suggesting that the stock is 84.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a beta of 0.711, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.91%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVMI or MGIC?
Nova Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Nova Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. pays out 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVMI or MGIC?
Nova Ltd. quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are larger than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. quarterly revenues of $161.7M. Nova Ltd.'s net income of $61.4M is higher than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s net income of $12M. Notably, Nova Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.11x while Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s PE ratio is 32.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Ltd. is 12.67x versus 2.15x for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVMINova Ltd.12.67x 44.11x $224.6M $61.4M MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.2.15x 32.46x $161.7M $12M
-
Which has Higher Returns NVMI or SYNX?
Silynxcom Ltd. has a net margin of 27.35% compared to Nova Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nova Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.1% beat Silynxcom Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVMINova Ltd.56.73% $1.89 $2.1B SYNXSilynxcom Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NVMI or SYNX?
Nova Ltd. has a consensus price target of $368.57, signalling upside risk potential of 9.68%. On the other hand Silynxcom Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 647.66%. Given that Silynxcom Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nova Ltd., analysts believe Silynxcom Ltd. is more attractive than Nova Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVMINova Ltd.6 2 0 SYNXSilynxcom Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is NVMI or SYNX More Risky?
Nova Ltd. has a beta of 1.843, which suggesting that the stock is 84.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silynxcom Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVMI or SYNX?
Nova Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silynxcom Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nova Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silynxcom Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVMI or SYNX?
Nova Ltd. quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are larger than Silynxcom Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Nova Ltd.'s net income of $61.4M is higher than Silynxcom Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Nova Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.11x while Silynxcom Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Ltd. is 12.67x versus 1.00x for Silynxcom Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVMINova Ltd.12.67x 44.11x $224.6M $61.4M SYNXSilynxcom Ltd.1.00x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
FTAI alert for Dec 31
FTAI Aviation Ltd. [FTAI] is down 0.38% over the past day.
Sell
45
LYEL alert for Dec 31
Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. [LYEL] is down 2.63% over the past day.
Sell
36
CORT alert for Dec 31
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is down 50.44% over the past day.
