NETD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

dMY Squared Technology Group has a net margin of -- compared to Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's net margin of --. Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's return on equity of -- beat dMY Squared Technology Group's return on equity of --.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand dMY Squared Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has higher upside potential than dMY Squared Technology Group, analysts believe Nabors Energy Transition Corp II is more attractive than dMY Squared Technology Group.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison dMY Squared Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. dMY Squared Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nabors Energy Transition Corp II pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. dMY Squared Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than dMY Squared Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's net income of $4M is higher than dMY Squared Technology Group's net income of $145.5K. Notably, Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.25x while dMY Squared Technology Group's PE ratio is 59.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nabors Energy Transition Corp II is -- versus -- for dMY Squared Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graf Global has a net margin of -- compared to Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's net margin of --. Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's return on equity of -- beat Graf Global's return on equity of --.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graf Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has higher upside potential than Graf Global, analysts believe Nabors Energy Transition Corp II is more attractive than Graf Global.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graf Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graf Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nabors Energy Transition Corp II pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graf Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graf Global quarterly revenues of --. Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's net income of $4M is higher than Graf Global's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.25x while Graf Global's PE ratio is 98.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nabors Energy Transition Corp II is -- versus -- for Graf Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coliseum Acquisition has a net margin of -- compared to Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's net margin of --. Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's return on equity of -- beat Coliseum Acquisition's return on equity of --.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coliseum Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has higher upside potential than Coliseum Acquisition, analysts believe Nabors Energy Transition Corp II is more attractive than Coliseum Acquisition.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coliseum Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coliseum Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nabors Energy Transition Corp II pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coliseum Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coliseum Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's net income of $4M is higher than Coliseum Acquisition's net income of -$694.9K. Notably, Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.25x while Coliseum Acquisition's PE ratio is 1,108.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nabors Energy Transition Corp II is -- versus -- for Coliseum Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unusual Machines has a net margin of -- compared to Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's net margin of -140.03%. Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's return on equity of -- beat Unusual Machines's return on equity of --.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unusual Machines has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could fall by -14.95%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Nabors Energy Transition Corp II, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Nabors Energy Transition Corp II.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unusual Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nabors Energy Transition Corp II pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unusual Machines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nabors Energy Transition Corp II quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unusual Machines quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's net income of $4M is higher than Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Nabors Energy Transition Corp II's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.25x while Unusual Machines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nabors Energy Transition Corp II is -- versus -- for Unusual Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.