NAAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -17.29% compared to NaaS Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 6.1%. NaaS Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7095.33% beat China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53%.

NaaS Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 40349.44%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 79.86%. Given that NaaS Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, Inc., analysts believe NaaS Technology, Inc. is more attractive than China Automotive Systems, Inc..

NaaS Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.205% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.83%.

NaaS Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. NaaS Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NaaS Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.2M, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.2M. NaaS Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is lower than China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, NaaS Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NaaS Technology, Inc. is 0.95x versus 0.17x for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group Ltd. has a net margin of -17.29% compared to NaaS Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 21.06%. NaaS Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7095.33% beat H World Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 33.7%.

NaaS Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 40349.44%. On the other hand H World Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $50.89 which suggests that it could grow by 7.82%. Given that NaaS Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than H World Group Ltd., analysts believe NaaS Technology, Inc. is more attractive than H World Group Ltd..

NaaS Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.205% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.874%.

NaaS Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. NaaS Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group Ltd. pays out 120.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

NaaS Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.2M, which are smaller than H World Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $979.3M. NaaS Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is lower than H World Group Ltd.'s net income of $206.3M. Notably, NaaS Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while H World Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 27.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NaaS Technology, Inc. is 0.95x versus 4.31x for H World Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a net margin of -17.29% compared to NaaS Technology, Inc.'s net margin of --. NaaS Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7095.33% beat JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.62%.

NaaS Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 40349.44%. On the other hand JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NaaS Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than JX Luxventure Group, Inc., analysts believe NaaS Technology, Inc. is more attractive than JX Luxventure Group, Inc..

NaaS Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.205% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.151%.

NaaS Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NaaS Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NaaS Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.2M, which are larger than JX Luxventure Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. NaaS Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is higher than JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, NaaS Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NaaS Technology, Inc. is 0.95x versus 0.26x for JX Luxventure Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a net margin of -17.29% compared to NaaS Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -13.73%. NaaS Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7095.33% beat Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.54%.

NaaS Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 40349.44%. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 443.36%. Given that NaaS Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc., analysts believe NaaS Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc..

NaaS Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.205% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.766%.

NaaS Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NaaS Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NaaS Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.2M, which are smaller than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.9M. NaaS Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is higher than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, NaaS Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NaaS Technology, Inc. is 0.95x versus 0.62x for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.