MVST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorman Products, Inc. has a net margin of -1.21% compared to Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 14.06%. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.6% beat Dorman Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.31%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 115.95%. On the other hand Dorman Products, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $173.50 which suggests that it could grow by 37.88%. Given that Microvast Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, Inc., analysts believe Microvast Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Dorman Products, Inc..

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.392, which suggesting that the stock is 239.213% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products, Inc. has a beta of 0.884, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.563%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $123.3M, which are smaller than Dorman Products, Inc. quarterly revenues of $543.7M. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Dorman Products, Inc.'s net income of $76.4M. Notably, Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dorman Products, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings, Inc. is 2.28x versus 1.82x for Dorman Products, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -1.21% compared to Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -1757.18%. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.6% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 115.95%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 152.53%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Microvast Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Microvast Holdings, Inc..

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.392, which suggesting that the stock is 239.213% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.113%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $123.3M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings, Inc. is 2.28x versus 81.00x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro, Inc. has a net margin of -1.21% compared to Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.96%. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.6% beat Monro, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.05%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 115.95%. On the other hand Monro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.67 which suggests that it could fall by -14.94%. Given that Microvast Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Monro, Inc., analysts believe Microvast Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Monro, Inc..

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.392, which suggesting that the stock is 239.213% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro, Inc. has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.533%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro, Inc. offers a yield of 5.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Microvast Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monro, Inc. pays out 673.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $123.3M, which are smaller than Monro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $288.9M. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Monro, Inc.'s net income of $5.7M. Notably, Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Monro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings, Inc. is 2.28x versus 0.53x for Monro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. has a net margin of -1.21% compared to Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -0.97%. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.6% beat Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.95%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 115.95%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 63%. Given that Microvast Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Motorcar Parts of America, Inc., analysts believe Microvast Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Motorcar Parts of America, Inc..

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.392, which suggesting that the stock is 239.213% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. has a beta of 1.263, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.319%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $123.3M, which are smaller than Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. quarterly revenues of $221.5M. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s PE ratio is 104.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings, Inc. is 2.28x versus 0.31x for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.