MVST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorman Products has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Microvast Holdings's net margin of 10.21%. Microvast Holdings's return on equity of -21.49% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 15.65%.

Microvast Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 71.67%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of $144.75 which suggests that it could grow by 26.75%. Given that Microvast Holdings has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe Microvast Holdings is more attractive than Dorman Products.

Microvast Holdings has a beta of 2.543, which suggesting that the stock is 154.299% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.871, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.852%.

Microvast Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.4M, which are smaller than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $533.8M. Microvast Holdings's net income of $13.2M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $54.5M. Notably, Microvast Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 18.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings is 2.02x versus 1.76x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Microvast Holdings's net margin of --. Microvast Holdings's return on equity of -21.49% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Microvast Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 71.67%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.79%. Given that Microvast Holdings has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Microvast Holdings is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Microvast Holdings has a beta of 2.543, which suggesting that the stock is 154.299% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.799%.

Microvast Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.4M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Microvast Holdings's net income of $13.2M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Microvast Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings is 2.02x versus 143.72x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Microvast Holdings's net margin of 1.5%. Microvast Holdings's return on equity of -21.49% beat Monro's return on equity of 3.03%.

Microvast Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 71.67%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $19.75 which suggests that it could grow by 35.46%. Given that Microvast Holdings has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe Microvast Holdings is more attractive than Monro.

Microvast Holdings has a beta of 2.543, which suggesting that the stock is 154.299% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.082%.

Microvast Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro offers a yield of 7.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Microvast Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out 94.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microvast Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.4M, which are smaller than Monro quarterly revenues of $305.8M. Microvast Holdings's net income of $13.2M is higher than Monro's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Microvast Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Monro's PE ratio is 22.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings is 2.02x versus 0.38x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Microvast Holdings's net margin of 1.23%. Microvast Holdings's return on equity of -21.49% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -6.4%.

Microvast Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 71.67%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 47.84%. Given that Microvast Holdings has higher upside potential than Motorcar Parts of America, analysts believe Microvast Holdings is more attractive than Motorcar Parts of America.

Microvast Holdings has a beta of 2.543, which suggesting that the stock is 154.299% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.186%.

Microvast Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Motorcar Parts of America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.4M, which are smaller than Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues of $186.2M. Microvast Holdings's net income of $13.2M is higher than Motorcar Parts of America's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Microvast Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Motorcar Parts of America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings is 2.02x versus 0.25x for Motorcar Parts of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.