MVST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crocs, Inc. has a net margin of -1.21% compared to Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 14.64%. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.6% beat Crocs, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 84.66%. On the other hand Crocs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.17%. Given that Microvast Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Crocs, Inc., analysts believe Microvast Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Crocs, Inc..

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.392, which suggesting that the stock is 239.213% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crocs, Inc. has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.972%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crocs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crocs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $123.3M, which are smaller than Crocs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $996.3M. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Crocs, Inc.'s net income of $145.8M. Notably, Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crocs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings, Inc. is 2.66x versus 1.23x for Crocs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a net margin of -1.21% compared to Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -4.47%. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.6% beat Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -33.57%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 84.66%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 132.56%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Microvast Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is more attractive than Microvast Holdings, Inc..

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.392, which suggesting that the stock is 239.213% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.958, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.799%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $123.3M, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.5M. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings, Inc. is 2.66x versus 0.09x for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -1.21% compared to Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -1757.18%. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.6% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 84.66%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 164.55%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Microvast Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Microvast Holdings, Inc..

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.392, which suggesting that the stock is 239.213% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.113%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $123.3M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings, Inc. is 2.66x versus 77.32x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perfect Moment Ltd. has a net margin of -1.21% compared to Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -38.63%. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.6% beat Perfect Moment Ltd.'s return on equity of -1043.59%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 84.66%. On the other hand Perfect Moment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 725.45%. Given that Perfect Moment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Microvast Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Perfect Moment Ltd. is more attractive than Microvast Holdings, Inc..

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.392, which suggesting that the stock is 239.213% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect Moment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perfect Moment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect Moment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $123.3M, which are larger than Perfect Moment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than Perfect Moment Ltd.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perfect Moment Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings, Inc. is 2.66x versus 0.43x for Perfect Moment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.