MVST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a net margin of -1.21% compared to Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -4.47%. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.6% beat Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -33.57%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 175.42%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 139.52%. Given that Microvast Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., analysts believe Microvast Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc..

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.359, which suggesting that the stock is 235.904% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.937, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.695%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $123.3M, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.5M. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings, Inc. is 1.78x versus 0.09x for Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorman Products, Inc. has a net margin of -1.21% compared to Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 14.06%. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.6% beat Dorman Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.31%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 175.42%. On the other hand Dorman Products, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $170.38 which suggests that it could grow by 29.89%. Given that Microvast Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, Inc., analysts believe Microvast Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Dorman Products, Inc..

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.359, which suggesting that the stock is 235.904% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products, Inc. has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.541%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $123.3M, which are smaller than Dorman Products, Inc. quarterly revenues of $543.7M. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Dorman Products, Inc.'s net income of $76.4M. Notably, Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dorman Products, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings, Inc. is 1.78x versus 1.90x for Dorman Products, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro, Inc. has a net margin of -1.21% compared to Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 3.8%. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.6% beat Monro, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.03%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 175.42%. On the other hand Monro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $25.63 which suggests that it could grow by 7.62%. Given that Microvast Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Monro, Inc., analysts believe Microvast Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Monro, Inc..

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.359, which suggesting that the stock is 235.904% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro, Inc. has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.134%.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro, Inc. offers a yield of 4.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Microvast Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monro, Inc. pays out 673.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $123.3M, which are smaller than Monro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $293.4M. Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Monro, Inc.'s net income of $11.1M. Notably, Microvast Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Monro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings, Inc. is 1.78x versus 0.62x for Monro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.