MTRX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Exponent has a net margin of -5.57% compared to Matrix Service's net margin of 19.11%. Matrix Service's return on equity of -18.37% beat Exponent's return on equity of 28.17%.

Matrix Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.87%. On the other hand Exponent has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.71%. Given that Exponent has higher upside potential than Matrix Service, analysts believe Exponent is more attractive than Matrix Service.

Matrix Service has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.877% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exponent has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.342%.

Matrix Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exponent offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Matrix Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exponent pays out 53.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Exponent's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matrix Service quarterly revenues are $165.6M, which are larger than Exponent quarterly revenues of $136.3M. Matrix Service's net income of -$9.2M is lower than Exponent's net income of $26M. Notably, Matrix Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exponent's PE ratio is 42.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matrix Service is 0.51x versus 8.27x for Exponent. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forrester Research has a net margin of -5.57% compared to Matrix Service's net margin of -5.66%. Matrix Service's return on equity of -18.37% beat Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.91%.

Matrix Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.87%. On the other hand Forrester Research has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31.06%. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than Matrix Service, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than Matrix Service.

Matrix Service has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.877% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forrester Research has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.853%.

Matrix Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forrester Research offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matrix Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forrester Research pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Matrix Service quarterly revenues are $165.6M, which are larger than Forrester Research quarterly revenues of $102.5M. Matrix Service's net income of -$9.2M is lower than Forrester Research's net income of -$5.8M. Notably, Matrix Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forrester Research's PE ratio is 239.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matrix Service is 0.51x versus 0.66x for Forrester Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of -5.57% compared to Matrix Service's net margin of 7.18%. Matrix Service's return on equity of -18.37% beat Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 16.4%.

Matrix Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.87%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group has an analysts' consensus of $140.67 which suggests that it could grow by 16.17%. Given that Matrix Service has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, analysts believe Matrix Service is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group.

Matrix Service has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.877% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.600, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.998%.

Matrix Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Huron Consulting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matrix Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Matrix Service quarterly revenues are $165.6M, which are smaller than Huron Consulting Group quarterly revenues of $378.1M. Matrix Service's net income of -$9.2M is lower than Huron Consulting Group's net income of $27.1M. Notably, Matrix Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Huron Consulting Group's PE ratio is 26.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matrix Service is 0.51x versus 1.55x for Huron Consulting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International has a net margin of -5.57% compared to Matrix Service's net margin of 6.32%. Matrix Service's return on equity of -18.37% beat ICF International's return on equity of 11.6%.

Matrix Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.87%. On the other hand ICF International has an analysts' consensus of $180.50 which suggests that it could grow by 56.48%. Given that ICF International has higher upside potential than Matrix Service, analysts believe ICF International is more attractive than Matrix Service.

Matrix Service has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.877% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International has a beta of 0.570, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.97%.

Matrix Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ICF International offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Matrix Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International pays out 12.76% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matrix Service quarterly revenues are $165.6M, which are smaller than ICF International quarterly revenues of $517M. Matrix Service's net income of -$9.2M is lower than ICF International's net income of $32.7M. Notably, Matrix Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ICF International's PE ratio is 20.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matrix Service is 0.51x versus 1.09x for ICF International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.