Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
34
LOBO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.65
Seasonality move
:
-4.89%
Day range:
$0.57 - $0.62
52-week range:
$0.35 - $2.41
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
22,500.00x
P/S ratio:
0.26x
P/B ratio:
0.63x
Volume:
47.3K
Avg. volume:
462.8K
1-year change:
-65.03%
Market cap:
$7.6M
Revenue:
$21.2M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.35
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOBO
LOBO Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
$906.2M | $0.29 | 15.31% | 28.99% | $51.49 |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KXIN
Kaixin Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOBO
LOBO Technologies Ltd.
|
$0.64 | -- | $7.6M | 22,500.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.26x |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
$2.02 | -- | $7.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.27x |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
$4.31 | -- | $130M | 3.88x | $0.80 | 0% | 0.18x |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
$47.99 | $51.49 | $14.7B | 27.78x | $0.81 | 3.71% | 4.42x |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
$0.85 | -- | $69.7M | 58.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.58x |
|
KXIN
Kaixin Holdings
|
$5.95 | -- | $162.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 17.07x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOBO
LOBO Technologies Ltd.
|
17.06% | 3.510 | -- | 0.23x |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
20.86% | 17.439 | 94.88% | 2.05x |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
17.66% | 0.486 | 42.96% | 0.94x |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
75.78% | -0.459 | 43.41% | 0.78x |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
17.09% | -0.683 | 46.02% | 1.15x |
|
KXIN
Kaixin Holdings
|
-- | 3.135 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOBO
LOBO Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.12% | 0.14% | -- | -- |
|
BQ
Boqii Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -17.81% | -25.13% | -- | -- |
|
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
|
$33.4M | $12.1M | 8.03% | 10.53% | 6.29% | $22.8M |
|
HTHT
H World Group Ltd.
|
$402.9M | $281.5M | 8.23% | 33.36% | 28.95% | $209.3M |
|
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.
|
$9.4M | -$6.6M | -1.38% | -1.54% | -9.78% | -- |
|
KXIN
Kaixin Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
LOBO Technologies Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LOBO or BQ?
Boqii Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of --. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.14% beat Boqii Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -25.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.-- -- $9.7M BQBoqii Holding Ltd.-- -- $44.8M -
What do Analysts Say About LOBO or BQ?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 528.44%. On the other hand Boqii Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29098.41%. Given that Boqii Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than LOBO Technologies Ltd., analysts believe Boqii Holding Ltd. is more attractive than LOBO Technologies Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 BQBoqii Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LOBO or BQ More Risky?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boqii Holding Ltd. has a beta of -2.368, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 336.8%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOBO or BQ?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boqii Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LOBO Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boqii Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOBO or BQ?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Boqii Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Boqii Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22,500.00x while Boqii Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LOBO Technologies Ltd. is 0.26x versus 7.27x for Boqii Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0.26x 22,500.00x -- -- BQBoqii Holding Ltd.7.27x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LOBO or CAAS?
China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of 6.1%. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.14% beat China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.-- -- $9.7M CAASChina Automotive Systems, Inc.17.28% $0.32 $507.1M -
What do Analysts Say About LOBO or CAAS?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 528.44%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 74.01%. Given that LOBO Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, Inc., analysts believe LOBO Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than China Automotive Systems, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 CAASChina Automotive Systems, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LOBO or CAAS More Risky?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.185%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOBO or CAAS?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. LOBO Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOBO or CAAS?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.2M. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22,500.00x while China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LOBO Technologies Ltd. is 0.26x versus 0.18x for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0.26x 22,500.00x -- -- CAASChina Automotive Systems, Inc.0.18x 3.88x $193.2M $11.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns LOBO or HTHT?
H World Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of 21.15%. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.14% beat H World Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 33.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.-- -- $9.7M HTHTH World Group Ltd.41.43% $0.63 $6.9B -
What do Analysts Say About LOBO or HTHT?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 528.44%. On the other hand H World Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $51.49 which suggests that it could grow by 7.19%. Given that LOBO Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than H World Group Ltd., analysts believe LOBO Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than H World Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 HTHTH World Group Ltd.11 1 0 -
Is LOBO or HTHT More Risky?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.562%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOBO or HTHT?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. LOBO Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group Ltd. pays out 120.75% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOBO or HTHT?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than H World Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $972.6M. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than H World Group Ltd.'s net income of $205.7M. Notably, LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22,500.00x while H World Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 27.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LOBO Technologies Ltd. is 0.26x versus 4.42x for H World Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0.26x 22,500.00x -- -- HTHTH World Group Ltd.4.42x 27.78x $972.6M $205.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns LOBO or KNDI?
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of -13.73%. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.14% beat Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.-- -- $9.7M KNDIKandi Technologies Group, Inc.31.3% -$0.05 $493.5M -
What do Analysts Say About LOBO or KNDI?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 528.44%. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 488.37%. Given that LOBO Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc., analysts believe LOBO Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 KNDIKandi Technologies Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LOBO or KNDI More Risky?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.441, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.914%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOBO or KNDI?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LOBO Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOBO or KNDI?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.9M. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22,500.00x while Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LOBO Technologies Ltd. is 0.26x versus 0.58x for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0.26x 22,500.00x -- -- KNDIKandi Technologies Group, Inc.0.58x 58.83x $29.9M -$4.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns LOBO or KXIN?
Kaixin Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of --. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.14% beat Kaixin Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.-- -- $9.7M KXINKaixin Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LOBO or KXIN?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 528.44%. On the other hand Kaixin Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LOBO Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kaixin Holdings, analysts believe LOBO Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Kaixin Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 KXINKaixin Holdings0 0 0 -
Is LOBO or KXIN More Risky?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaixin Holdings has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.305%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOBO or KXIN?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaixin Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LOBO Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaixin Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOBO or KXIN?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kaixin Holdings quarterly revenues of --. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kaixin Holdings's net income of --. Notably, LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22,500.00x while Kaixin Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LOBO Technologies Ltd. is 0.26x versus 17.07x for Kaixin Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0.26x 22,500.00x -- -- KXINKaixin Holdings17.07x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
55
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
45
CTEV alert for Jan 5
Claritev Corp. [CTEV] is down 27.84% over the past day.
Buy
60
BIDU alert for Jan 5
Baidu, Inc. [BIDU] is down 0.96% over the past day.
Sell
47
ASTS alert for Jan 5
AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 24.05% over the past day.
