How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Sell
36
LOBO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.63
Seasonality move
:
-4.89%
Day range:
$0.58 - $0.64
52-week range:
$0.35 - $2.41
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
22,500.00x
P/S ratio:
0.25x
P/B ratio:
0.63x
Volume:
50.5K
Avg. volume:
94.5K
1-year change:
-55.98%
Market cap:
$7.4M
Revenue:
$21.2M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.35
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOBO
LOBO Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMEIF
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CZASF
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KXIN
Kaixin Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UXIN
Uxin Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $4.50 |
|
ZSHGY
Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOBO
LOBO Technologies Ltd.
|
$0.62 | -- | $7.4M | 22,500.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.25x |
|
CMEIF
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.16 | -- | $214.5M | 39.27x | $0.01 | 3.91% | 0.07x |
|
CZASF
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.01 | -- | $101.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
|
KXIN
Kaixin Holdings
|
$0.88 | -- | $24M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.53x |
|
UXIN
Uxin Ltd.
|
$3.42 | $4.50 | $705.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.89x |
|
ZSHGY
Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.
|
$14.05 | -- | $3.3B | 9.18x | $0.86 | 6.15% | 0.15x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOBO
LOBO Technologies Ltd.
|
17.06% | 3.777 | -- | 0.23x |
|
CMEIF
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.
|
49.34% | 0.189 | -- | 0.58x |
|
CZASF
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.
|
101.82% | 0.000 | -- | 0.26x |
|
KXIN
Kaixin Holdings
|
-- | 3.165 | -- | -- |
|
UXIN
Uxin Ltd.
|
112.94% | -1.402 | 32.96% | 0.12x |
|
ZSHGY
Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.
|
41.13% | -0.613 | -- | 0.53x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOBO
LOBO Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.12% | 0.14% | -- | -- |
|
CMEIF
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -29.67% | -50.64% | -- | -- |
|
CZASF
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -7.6% | -126.9% | -- | -- |
|
KXIN
Kaixin Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UXIN
Uxin Ltd.
|
$9.2M | -$8M | -15.83% | -- | -6.53% | -- |
|
ZSHGY
Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 4.71% | 7.94% | -- | -- |
LOBO Technologies Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LOBO or CMEIF?
China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of --. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.14% beat China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -50.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.-- -- $9.7M CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.-- -- $783.2M -
What do Analysts Say About LOBO or CMEIF?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 545.16%. On the other hand China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LOBO Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd., analysts believe LOBO Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LOBO or CMEIF More Risky?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.057, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.349%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOBO or CMEIF?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. LOBO Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. pays out 1.97% of its earnings as a dividend. China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOBO or CMEIF?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22,500.00x while China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 39.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LOBO Technologies Ltd. is 0.25x versus 0.07x for China MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0.25x 22,500.00x -- -- CMEIFChina MeiDong Auto Holdings Ltd.0.07x 39.27x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LOBO or CZASF?
China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of --. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.14% beat China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -126.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.-- -- $9.7M CZASFChina Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.-- -- $2.9B -
What do Analysts Say About LOBO or CZASF?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 545.16%. On the other hand China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LOBO Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd., analysts believe LOBO Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 CZASFChina Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LOBO or CZASF More Risky?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -1.110, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.006%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOBO or CZASF?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LOBO Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOBO or CZASF?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22,500.00x while China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LOBO Technologies Ltd. is 0.25x versus 0.01x for China Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0.25x 22,500.00x -- -- CZASFChina Zhengtong Auto Services Holdings Ltd.0.01x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LOBO or KXIN?
Kaixin Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of --. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.14% beat Kaixin Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.-- -- $9.7M KXINKaixin Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LOBO or KXIN?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 545.16%. On the other hand Kaixin Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LOBO Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kaixin Holdings, analysts believe LOBO Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Kaixin Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 KXINKaixin Holdings0 0 0 -
Is LOBO or KXIN More Risky?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaixin Holdings has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.963%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOBO or KXIN?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaixin Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LOBO Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaixin Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOBO or KXIN?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kaixin Holdings quarterly revenues of --. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kaixin Holdings's net income of --. Notably, LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22,500.00x while Kaixin Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LOBO Technologies Ltd. is 0.25x versus 2.53x for Kaixin Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0.25x 22,500.00x -- -- KXINKaixin Holdings2.53x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LOBO or UXIN?
Uxin Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of -6.9%. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.14% beat Uxin Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.-- -- $9.7M UXINUxin Ltd.7.5% -$0.04 $266M -
What do Analysts Say About LOBO or UXIN?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 545.16%. On the other hand Uxin Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that LOBO Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Uxin Ltd., analysts believe LOBO Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Uxin Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 UXINUxin Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is LOBO or UXIN More Risky?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uxin Ltd. has a beta of 1.519, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.934%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOBO or UXIN?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uxin Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LOBO Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uxin Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOBO or UXIN?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Uxin Ltd. quarterly revenues of $122.9M. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Uxin Ltd.'s net income of -$8.5M. Notably, LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22,500.00x while Uxin Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LOBO Technologies Ltd. is 0.25x versus 1.89x for Uxin Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0.25x 22,500.00x -- -- UXINUxin Ltd.1.89x -- $122.9M -$8.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns LOBO or ZSHGY?
Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of --. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.14% beat Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.-- -- $9.7M ZSHGYZhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About LOBO or ZSHGY?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 545.16%. On the other hand Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LOBO Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd., analysts believe LOBO Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 ZSHGYZhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LOBO or ZSHGY More Risky?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.054%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOBO or ZSHGY?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 6.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. LOBO Technologies Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd. pays out 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOBO or ZSHGY?
LOBO Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, LOBO Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22,500.00x while Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LOBO Technologies Ltd. is 0.25x versus 0.15x for Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOBOLOBO Technologies Ltd.0.25x 22,500.00x -- -- ZSHGYZhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.0.15x 9.18x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 7
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 37.11% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 7
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is up 28.33% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 7
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 26.08% over the past day.
