LITM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brazil Potash Corp has a net margin of -- compared to Snow Lake Resources's net margin of --. Snow Lake Resources's return on equity of -- beat Brazil Potash Corp's return on equity of --.

Snow Lake Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Brazil Potash Corp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Snow Lake Resources has higher upside potential than Brazil Potash Corp, analysts believe Snow Lake Resources is more attractive than Brazil Potash Corp.

Snow Lake Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brazil Potash Corp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Snow Lake Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brazil Potash Corp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snow Lake Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brazil Potash Corp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Snow Lake Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Brazil Potash Corp quarterly revenues of --. Snow Lake Resources's net income of -- is lower than Brazil Potash Corp's net income of --. Notably, Snow Lake Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brazil Potash Corp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snow Lake Resources is -- versus -- for Brazil Potash Corp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of -- compared to Snow Lake Resources's net margin of -124.64%. Snow Lake Resources's return on equity of -- beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -3.65%.

Snow Lake Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.21 which suggests that it could grow by 165.15%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Snow Lake Resources, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Snow Lake Resources.

Snow Lake Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Snow Lake Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Snow Lake Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -9.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Snow Lake Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Snow Lake Resources's net income of -- is lower than Gold Royalty's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Snow Lake Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snow Lake Resources is -- versus 23.97x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loop Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Snow Lake Resources's net margin of -21039.13%. Snow Lake Resources's return on equity of -- beat Loop Industries's return on equity of -138.36%.

Snow Lake Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Loop Industries has an analysts' consensus of $4.70 which suggests that it could grow by 291.67%. Given that Loop Industries has higher upside potential than Snow Lake Resources, analysts believe Loop Industries is more attractive than Snow Lake Resources.

Snow Lake Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loop Industries has a beta of 1.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.352%.

Snow Lake Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Loop Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snow Lake Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Loop Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Snow Lake Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Loop Industries quarterly revenues of $23K. Snow Lake Resources's net income of -- is lower than Loop Industries's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, Snow Lake Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Loop Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snow Lake Resources is -- versus 570.48x for Loop Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Goldmining has a net margin of -- compared to Snow Lake Resources's net margin of --. Snow Lake Resources's return on equity of -- beat US Goldmining's return on equity of --.

Snow Lake Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand US Goldmining has an analysts' consensus of $26.50 which suggests that it could grow by 239.74%. Given that US Goldmining has higher upside potential than Snow Lake Resources, analysts believe US Goldmining is more attractive than Snow Lake Resources.

Snow Lake Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Goldmining has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Snow Lake Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Goldmining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snow Lake Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Goldmining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Snow Lake Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than US Goldmining quarterly revenues of --. Snow Lake Resources's net income of -- is lower than US Goldmining's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Snow Lake Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while US Goldmining's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snow Lake Resources is -- versus -- for US Goldmining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.