LION Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HeadsUp Entertainment International has a net margin of -13.77% compared to Lionsgate Studios's net margin of --. Lionsgate Studios's return on equity of -- beat HeadsUp Entertainment International's return on equity of --.

Lionsgate Studios has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 46.36%. On the other hand HeadsUp Entertainment International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lionsgate Studios has higher upside potential than HeadsUp Entertainment International, analysts believe Lionsgate Studios is more attractive than HeadsUp Entertainment International.

Lionsgate Studios has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HeadsUp Entertainment International has a beta of 0.222, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.816%.

Lionsgate Studios has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HeadsUp Entertainment International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lionsgate Studios pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HeadsUp Entertainment International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lionsgate Studios quarterly revenues are $823.7M, which are larger than HeadsUp Entertainment International quarterly revenues of --. Lionsgate Studios's net income of -$113.4M is higher than HeadsUp Entertainment International's net income of --. Notably, Lionsgate Studios's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HeadsUp Entertainment International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionsgate Studios is 0.71x versus -- for HeadsUp Entertainment International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Imax has a net margin of -13.77% compared to Lionsgate Studios's net margin of 15.2%. Lionsgate Studios's return on equity of -- beat Imax's return on equity of 6.67%.

Lionsgate Studios has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 46.36%. On the other hand Imax has an analysts' consensus of $27.27 which suggests that it could grow by 11.23%. Given that Lionsgate Studios has higher upside potential than Imax, analysts believe Lionsgate Studios is more attractive than Imax.

Lionsgate Studios has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imax has a beta of 1.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.317%.

Lionsgate Studios has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Imax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lionsgate Studios pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lionsgate Studios quarterly revenues are $823.7M, which are larger than Imax quarterly revenues of $91.5M. Lionsgate Studios's net income of -$113.4M is lower than Imax's net income of $13.9M. Notably, Lionsgate Studios's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Imax's PE ratio is 55.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionsgate Studios is 0.71x versus 3.83x for Imax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lions Gate Entertainment has a net margin of -13.77% compared to Lionsgate Studios's net margin of -17.22%. Lionsgate Studios's return on equity of -- beat Lions Gate Entertainment's return on equity of -4775.91%.

Lionsgate Studios has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 46.36%. On the other hand Lions Gate Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.19%. Given that Lionsgate Studios has higher upside potential than Lions Gate Entertainment, analysts believe Lionsgate Studios is more attractive than Lions Gate Entertainment.

Lionsgate Studios has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lions Gate Entertainment has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.194%.

Lionsgate Studios has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lions Gate Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lionsgate Studios pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lions Gate Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lionsgate Studios quarterly revenues are $823.7M, which are smaller than Lions Gate Entertainment quarterly revenues of $948.6M. Lionsgate Studios's net income of -$113.4M is higher than Lions Gate Entertainment's net income of -$163.3M. Notably, Lionsgate Studios's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lions Gate Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionsgate Studios is 0.71x versus 0.43x for Lions Gate Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of -13.77% compared to Lionsgate Studios's net margin of 0.02%. Lionsgate Studios's return on equity of -- beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -26.78%.

Lionsgate Studios has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 46.36%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.77 which suggests that it could grow by 19.53%. Given that Lionsgate Studios has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Lionsgate Studios is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Lionsgate Studios has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.712, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.201%.

Lionsgate Studios has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Lionsgate Studios pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -73.52% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lionsgate Studios quarterly revenues are $823.7M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Lionsgate Studios's net income of -$113.4M is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $1M. Notably, Lionsgate Studios's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionsgate Studios is 0.71x versus 0.24x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.