LFVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Better Choice has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Lifevantage's net margin of 13.42%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 26.66% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Lifevantage has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 124.53%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 422.19%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Lifevantage, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Lifevantage.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.171%.

Lifevantage has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifevantage pays 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifevantage quarterly revenues are $67.8M, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Lifevantage's net income of $2.6M is higher than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Lifevantage's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.85x while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifevantage is 0.89x versus 0.08x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hain Celestial Group has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Lifevantage's net margin of -25.27%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 26.66% beat The Hain Celestial Group's return on equity of -18.79%.

Lifevantage has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 124.53%. On the other hand The Hain Celestial Group has an analysts' consensus of $6.15 which suggests that it could grow by 109.9%. Given that Lifevantage has higher upside potential than The Hain Celestial Group, analysts believe Lifevantage is more attractive than The Hain Celestial Group.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hain Celestial Group has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.64%.

Lifevantage has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. The Hain Celestial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifevantage pays 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hain Celestial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifevantage quarterly revenues are $67.8M, which are smaller than The Hain Celestial Group quarterly revenues of $411.5M. Lifevantage's net income of $2.6M is higher than The Hain Celestial Group's net income of -$104M. Notably, Lifevantage's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.85x while The Hain Celestial Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifevantage is 0.89x versus 0.16x for The Hain Celestial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthy Choice Wellness has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Lifevantage's net margin of -14.58%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 26.66% beat Healthy Choice Wellness's return on equity of -80.93%.

Lifevantage has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 124.53%. On the other hand Healthy Choice Wellness has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 365.33%. Given that Healthy Choice Wellness has higher upside potential than Lifevantage, analysts believe Healthy Choice Wellness is more attractive than Lifevantage.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthy Choice Wellness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lifevantage has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Healthy Choice Wellness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifevantage pays 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Healthy Choice Wellness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifevantage quarterly revenues are $67.8M, which are larger than Healthy Choice Wellness quarterly revenues of $18.2M. Lifevantage's net income of $2.6M is higher than Healthy Choice Wellness's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Lifevantage's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.85x while Healthy Choice Wellness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifevantage is 0.89x versus 0.06x for Healthy Choice Wellness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Lifevantage's net margin of -3.43%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 26.66% beat Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01%.

Lifevantage has a consensus price target of $32.50, signalling upside risk potential of 124.53%. On the other hand Laird Superfood has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 150.97%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Lifevantage, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Lifevantage.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lifevantage has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Laird Superfood offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifevantage pays 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifevantage quarterly revenues are $67.8M, which are larger than Laird Superfood quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Lifevantage's net income of $2.6M is higher than Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K. Notably, Lifevantage's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.85x while Laird Superfood's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifevantage is 0.89x versus 1.19x for Laird Superfood. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.