LFVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridgford Foods Corp. has a net margin of 4.53% compared to LifeVantage Corp.'s net margin of -3.15%. LifeVantage Corp.'s return on equity of 31.79% beat Bridgford Foods Corp.'s return on equity of -5.79%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 129.07%. On the other hand Bridgford Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LifeVantage Corp. has higher upside potential than Bridgford Foods Corp., analysts believe LifeVantage Corp. is more attractive than Bridgford Foods Corp..

LifeVantage Corp. has a beta of 0.299, which suggesting that the stock is 70.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridgford Foods Corp. has a beta of -0.249, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.925%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Bridgford Foods Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LifeVantage Corp. pays 21.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Bridgford Foods Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LifeVantage Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LifeVantage Corp. quarterly revenues are $47.6M, which are smaller than Bridgford Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $52M. LifeVantage Corp.'s net income of $2.2M is higher than Bridgford Foods Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, LifeVantage Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.22x while Bridgford Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 62.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeVantage Corp. is 0.36x versus 0.29x for Bridgford Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a net margin of 4.53% compared to LifeVantage Corp.'s net margin of -5.61%. LifeVantage Corp.'s return on equity of 31.79% beat The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -78.55%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 129.07%. On the other hand The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.41 which suggests that it could grow by 109.89%. Given that LifeVantage Corp. has higher upside potential than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., analysts believe LifeVantage Corp. is more attractive than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc..

LifeVantage Corp. has a beta of 0.299, which suggesting that the stock is 70.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.35%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LifeVantage Corp. pays 21.85% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LifeVantage Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LifeVantage Corp. quarterly revenues are $47.6M, which are smaller than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $367.9M. LifeVantage Corp.'s net income of $2.2M is higher than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s net income of -$20.6M. Notably, LifeVantage Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.22x while The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeVantage Corp. is 0.36x versus 0.07x for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a net margin of 4.53% compared to LifeVantage Corp.'s net margin of -3.52%. LifeVantage Corp.'s return on equity of 31.79% beat Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s return on equity of -43.51%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 129.07%. On the other hand Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 538.77%. Given that Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has higher upside potential than LifeVantage Corp., analysts believe Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. is more attractive than LifeVantage Corp..

LifeVantage Corp. has a beta of 0.299, which suggesting that the stock is 70.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LifeVantage Corp. pays 21.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LifeVantage Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LifeVantage Corp. quarterly revenues are $47.6M, which are larger than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.3M. LifeVantage Corp.'s net income of $2.2M is higher than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s net income of -$712.4K. Notably, LifeVantage Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.22x while Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeVantage Corp. is 0.36x versus 0.05x for Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a net margin of 4.53% compared to LifeVantage Corp.'s net margin of -7.56%. LifeVantage Corp.'s return on equity of 31.79% beat Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 129.07%. On the other hand Laird Superfood, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.67 which suggests that it could grow by 234.79%. Given that Laird Superfood, Inc. has higher upside potential than LifeVantage Corp., analysts believe Laird Superfood, Inc. is more attractive than LifeVantage Corp..

LifeVantage Corp. has a beta of 0.299, which suggesting that the stock is 70.137% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.351, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.079%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Laird Superfood, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LifeVantage Corp. pays 21.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LifeVantage Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LifeVantage Corp. quarterly revenues are $47.6M, which are larger than Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.9M. LifeVantage Corp.'s net income of $2.2M is higher than Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K. Notably, LifeVantage Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.22x while Laird Superfood, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeVantage Corp. is 0.36x versus 0.50x for Laird Superfood, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.