LFVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Better Choice has a net margin of 3.87% compared to Lifevantage's net margin of 13.42%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 15.08% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Lifevantage has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.06%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 327.35%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Lifevantage, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Lifevantage.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.93% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.134%.

Lifevantage has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifevantage pays 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifevantage quarterly revenues are $47.2M, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Lifevantage's net income of $1.8M is higher than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Lifevantage's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.41x while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifevantage is 1.08x versus 0.08x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ChromaDex has a net margin of 3.87% compared to Lifevantage's net margin of 7.34%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 15.08% beat ChromaDex's return on equity of 4.96%.

Lifevantage has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.06%. On the other hand ChromaDex has an analysts' consensus of $6.08 which suggests that it could grow by 47.41%. Given that Lifevantage has higher upside potential than ChromaDex, analysts believe Lifevantage is more attractive than ChromaDex.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.93% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChromaDex has a beta of 2.209, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.901%.

Lifevantage has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. ChromaDex offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifevantage pays 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend. ChromaDex pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifevantage quarterly revenues are $47.2M, which are larger than ChromaDex quarterly revenues of $25.6M. Lifevantage's net income of $1.8M is lower than ChromaDex's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Lifevantage's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.41x while ChromaDex's PE ratio is 550.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifevantage is 1.08x versus 4.47x for ChromaDex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 3.87% compared to Lifevantage's net margin of -4.54%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 15.08% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 2.78%.

Lifevantage has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.06%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $37.60 which suggests that it could grow by 26.29%. Given that Lifevantage has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe Lifevantage is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.93% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.892%.

Lifevantage has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Lifevantage pays 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 68.83% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Lifevantage's is not.

Lifevantage quarterly revenues are $47.2M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Lifevantage's net income of $1.8M is higher than The Kraft Heinz's net income of -$290M. Notably, Lifevantage's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.41x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 26.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifevantage is 1.08x versus 1.40x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood has a net margin of 3.87% compared to Lifevantage's net margin of -1.41%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 15.08% beat Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88%.

Lifevantage has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.06%. On the other hand Laird Superfood has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 76.15%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Lifevantage, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Lifevantage.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.93% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lifevantage has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Laird Superfood offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifevantage pays 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lifevantage quarterly revenues are $47.2M, which are larger than Laird Superfood quarterly revenues of $11.8M. Lifevantage's net income of $1.8M is higher than Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K. Notably, Lifevantage's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.41x while Laird Superfood's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifevantage is 1.08x versus 1.75x for Laird Superfood. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.