LFVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridgford Foods Corp. has a net margin of 0.56% compared to LifeVantage Corp.'s net margin of -8.9%. LifeVantage Corp.'s return on equity of 23.86% beat Bridgford Foods Corp.'s return on equity of -10.85%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.27%. On the other hand Bridgford Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LifeVantage Corp. has higher upside potential than Bridgford Foods Corp., analysts believe LifeVantage Corp. is more attractive than Bridgford Foods Corp..

LifeVantage Corp. has a beta of 0.330, which suggesting that the stock is 66.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridgford Foods Corp. has a beta of -0.262, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.174%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. Bridgford Foods Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LifeVantage Corp. pays 21.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Bridgford Foods Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LifeVantage Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LifeVantage Corp. quarterly revenues are $48.9M, which are smaller than Bridgford Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $75.8M. LifeVantage Corp.'s net income of $276K is higher than Bridgford Foods Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, LifeVantage Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.24x while Bridgford Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 62.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeVantage Corp. is 0.31x versus 0.30x for Bridgford Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a net margin of 0.56% compared to LifeVantage Corp.'s net margin of -821.05%. LifeVantage Corp.'s return on equity of 23.86% beat RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.77%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.27%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LifeVantage Corp. has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, Inc., analysts believe LifeVantage Corp. is more attractive than RegalWorks Media, Inc..

LifeVantage Corp. has a beta of 0.330, which suggesting that the stock is 66.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a beta of -1.029, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 202.919%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. RegalWorks Media, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LifeVantage Corp. pays 21.85% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LifeVantage Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LifeVantage Corp. quarterly revenues are $48.9M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9K. LifeVantage Corp.'s net income of $276K is higher than RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s net income of -$15.6K. Notably, LifeVantage Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.24x while RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeVantage Corp. is 0.31x versus 1,022.80x for RegalWorks Media, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 0.56% compared to LifeVantage Corp.'s net margin of 4.34%. LifeVantage Corp.'s return on equity of 23.86% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.46%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.27%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $85.29 which suggests that it could grow by 8.89%. Given that LifeVantage Corp. has higher upside potential than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., analysts believe LifeVantage Corp. is more attractive than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc..

LifeVantage Corp. has a beta of 0.330, which suggesting that the stock is 66.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.55%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. LifeVantage Corp. pays 21.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LifeVantage Corp. quarterly revenues are $48.9M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $677M. LifeVantage Corp.'s net income of $276K is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $29.4M. Notably, LifeVantage Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.24x while Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeVantage Corp. is 0.31x versus 0.70x for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

USANA Health Sciences, Inc. has a net margin of 0.56% compared to LifeVantage Corp.'s net margin of -3.12%. LifeVantage Corp.'s return on equity of 23.86% beat USANA Health Sciences, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.06%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.27%. On the other hand USANA Health Sciences, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could grow by 88.77%. Given that USANA Health Sciences, Inc. has higher upside potential than LifeVantage Corp., analysts believe USANA Health Sciences, Inc. is more attractive than LifeVantage Corp..

LifeVantage Corp. has a beta of 0.330, which suggesting that the stock is 66.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison USANA Health Sciences, Inc. has a beta of 0.671, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.865%.

LifeVantage Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. USANA Health Sciences, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LifeVantage Corp. pays 21.85% of its earnings as a dividend. USANA Health Sciences, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. LifeVantage Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LifeVantage Corp. quarterly revenues are $48.9M, which are smaller than USANA Health Sciences, Inc. quarterly revenues of $213.7M. LifeVantage Corp.'s net income of $276K is higher than USANA Health Sciences, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, LifeVantage Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.24x while USANA Health Sciences, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LifeVantage Corp. is 0.31x versus 0.42x for USANA Health Sciences, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.