Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
53
LECO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$244.02
Seasonality move
:
3.36%
Day range:
$234.82 - $241.36
52-week range:
$161.11 - $249.19
Dividend yield:
1.25%
P/E ratio:
25.82x
P/S ratio:
3.24x
P/B ratio:
9.37x
Volume:
242.1K
Avg. volume:
387.9K
1-year change:
12.68%
Market cap:
$13.3B
Revenue:
$4B
EPS (TTM):
$9.33
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LECO
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
|
$1.1B | $2.42 | 6.83% | 2.89% | $263.90 |
|
AMSC
American Superconductor Corp.
|
$67.2M | $0.15 | 9.39% | 128.81% | $63.00 |
|
BONL
Bonal International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
|
$146.5M | $0.39 | 0.86% | -1.59% | $51.00 |
|
NDSN
Nordson Corp.
|
$761M | $2.93 | 6.33% | 42% | $257.30 |
|
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
|
$3.8B | $1.19 | 1.64% | -0.28% | $85.30 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LECO
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
|
$240.96 | $263.90 | $13.3B | 25.82x | $0.75 | 1.25% | 3.24x |
|
AMSC
American Superconductor Corp.
|
$32.04 | $63.00 | $1.4B | 86.13x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.84x |
|
BONL
Bonal International, Inc.
|
$0.90 | -- | $1.6M | 15.46x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.92x |
|
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
|
$37.64 | $51.00 | $2B | 22.09x | $0.04 | 0.11% | 3.32x |
|
NDSN
Nordson Corp.
|
$238.59 | $257.30 | $13.4B | 29.99x | $0.82 | 1.32% | 4.90x |
|
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
|
$72.53 | $85.30 | $11.2B | 25.09x | $0.83 | 4.55% | 0.73x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LECO
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
|
47.79% | 1.674 | 9.98% | 0.88x |
|
AMSC
American Superconductor Corp.
|
1.06% | 5.966 | 0.14% | 2.91x |
|
BONL
Bonal International, Inc.
|
2.62% | -0.118 | 4.9% | 6.60x |
|
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
|
34.43% | 0.949 | 10.16% | 1.91x |
|
NDSN
Nordson Corp.
|
42.69% | 1.638 | 18.35% | 0.95x |
|
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
|
42.42% | 1.857 | 57.45% | 0.27x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LECO
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
|
$389.8M | $183.5M | 19.64% | 38.58% | 17.32% | $205.1M |
|
AMSC
American Superconductor Corp.
|
$20.1M | $3M | 5.96% | 6.05% | 4.5% | $5.1M |
|
BONL
Bonal International, Inc.
|
$246.1K | -$42.1K | 5.68% | 5.96% | -12.33% | -$81.9K |
|
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
|
$81.9M | $39.8M | 14.96% | 22.43% | 23.78% | $52.3M |
|
NDSN
Nordson Corp.
|
$406.5M | $200M | 8.97% | 15.58% | 26.97% | $226.4M |
|
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
|
$1.2B | $364.5M | 2.83% | 4.93% | 9.71% | $155.3M |
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LECO or AMSC?
American Superconductor Corp. has a net margin of 11.57% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.21%. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.58% beat American Superconductor Corp.'s return on equity of 6.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.36.78% $2.21 $2.7B AMSCAmerican Superconductor Corp.30.52% $0.11 $345.8M -
What do Analysts Say About LECO or AMSC?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $263.90, signalling upside risk potential of 9.52%. On the other hand American Superconductor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $63.00 which suggests that it could grow by 96.63%. Given that American Superconductor Corp. has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc., analysts believe American Superconductor Corp. is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.6 3 1 AMSCAmerican Superconductor Corp.3 0 0 -
Is LECO or AMSC More Risky?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Superconductor Corp. has a beta of 2.973, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 197.281%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LECO or AMSC?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. American Superconductor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. American Superconductor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LECO or AMSC?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than American Superconductor Corp. quarterly revenues of $65.9M. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $122.6M is higher than American Superconductor Corp.'s net income of $4.8M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.82x while American Superconductor Corp.'s PE ratio is 86.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is 3.24x versus 4.84x for American Superconductor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.3.24x 25.82x $1.1B $122.6M AMSCAmerican Superconductor Corp.4.84x 86.13x $65.9M $4.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns LECO or BONL?
Bonal International, Inc. has a net margin of 11.57% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -9.72%. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.58% beat Bonal International, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.36.78% $2.21 $2.7B BONLBonal International, Inc.72.06% -- $1.8M -
What do Analysts Say About LECO or BONL?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $263.90, signalling upside risk potential of 9.52%. On the other hand Bonal International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bonal International, Inc., analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Bonal International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.6 3 1 BONLBonal International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LECO or BONL More Risky?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bonal International, Inc. has a beta of 0.078, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.221%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LECO or BONL?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Bonal International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Bonal International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LECO or BONL?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Bonal International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $341.5K. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $122.6M is higher than Bonal International, Inc.'s net income of -$33.2K. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.82x while Bonal International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is 3.24x versus 0.92x for Bonal International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.3.24x 25.82x $1.1B $122.6M BONLBonal International, Inc.0.92x 15.46x $341.5K -$33.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns LECO or EPAC?
Enerpac Tool Group Corp. has a net margin of 11.57% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 16.76%. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.58% beat Enerpac Tool Group Corp.'s return on equity of 22.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.36.78% $2.21 $2.7B EPACEnerpac Tool Group Corp.48.89% $0.52 $661.4M -
What do Analysts Say About LECO or EPAC?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $263.90, signalling upside risk potential of 9.52%. On the other hand Enerpac Tool Group Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $51.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.49%. Given that Enerpac Tool Group Corp. has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Enerpac Tool Group Corp. is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.6 3 1 EPACEnerpac Tool Group Corp.1 0 0 -
Is LECO or EPAC More Risky?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enerpac Tool Group Corp. has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.17799999999999%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LECO or EPAC?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Enerpac Tool Group Corp. offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Enerpac Tool Group Corp. pays out 2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LECO or EPAC?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Enerpac Tool Group Corp. quarterly revenues of $167.5M. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $122.6M is higher than Enerpac Tool Group Corp.'s net income of $28.1M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.82x while Enerpac Tool Group Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is 3.24x versus 3.32x for Enerpac Tool Group Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.3.24x 25.82x $1.1B $122.6M EPACEnerpac Tool Group Corp.3.32x 22.09x $167.5M $28.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns LECO or NDSN?
Nordson Corp. has a net margin of 11.57% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 16.96%. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.58% beat Nordson Corp.'s return on equity of 15.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.36.78% $2.21 $2.7B NDSNNordson Corp.54.82% $2.22 $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About LECO or NDSN?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $263.90, signalling upside risk potential of 9.52%. On the other hand Nordson Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $257.30 which suggests that it could grow by 7.84%. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nordson Corp., analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Nordson Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.6 3 1 NDSNNordson Corp.5 5 0 -
Is LECO or NDSN More Risky?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson Corp. has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.457%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LECO or NDSN?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Nordson Corp. offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson Corp. pays out 34.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LECO or NDSN?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Nordson Corp. quarterly revenues of $741.5M. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $122.6M is lower than Nordson Corp.'s net income of $125.8M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.82x while Nordson Corp.'s PE ratio is 29.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is 3.24x versus 4.90x for Nordson Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.3.24x 25.82x $1.1B $122.6M NDSNNordson Corp.4.90x 29.99x $741.5M $125.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns LECO or SWK?
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a net margin of 11.57% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.37%. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.58% beat Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.36.78% $2.21 $2.7B SWKStanley Black & Decker, Inc.30.66% $0.34 $15.6B -
What do Analysts Say About LECO or SWK?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $263.90, signalling upside risk potential of 9.52%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $85.30 which suggests that it could grow by 17.6%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.6 3 1 SWKStanley Black & Decker, Inc.5 12 0 -
Is LECO or SWK More Risky?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.385%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LECO or SWK?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. pays out 172.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LECO or SWK?
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $122.6M is higher than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net income of $51.4M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.82x while Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is 3.24x versus 0.73x for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.3.24x 25.82x $1.1B $122.6M SWKStanley Black & Decker, Inc.0.73x 25.09x $3.8B $51.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4
Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.
