LECO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bonal International, Inc. has a net margin of 11.57% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -9.72%. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.58% beat Bonal International, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.96%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $262.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.01%. On the other hand Bonal International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bonal International, Inc., analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Bonal International, Inc..

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bonal International, Inc. has a beta of 0.078, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.221%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Bonal International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Bonal International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Bonal International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $341.5K. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $122.6M is higher than Bonal International, Inc.'s net income of -$33.2K. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.29x while Bonal International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is 3.30x versus 0.92x for Bonal International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. has a net margin of 11.57% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 13.27%. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.58% beat Enerpac Tool Group Corp.'s return on equity of 21.4%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $262.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.01%. On the other hand Enerpac Tool Group Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $51.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.12%. Given that Enerpac Tool Group Corp. has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Enerpac Tool Group Corp. is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc..

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enerpac Tool Group Corp. has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.17799999999999%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Enerpac Tool Group Corp. offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Enerpac Tool Group Corp. pays out 2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Enerpac Tool Group Corp. quarterly revenues of $144.2M. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $122.6M is higher than Enerpac Tool Group Corp.'s net income of $19.1M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.29x while Enerpac Tool Group Corp.'s PE ratio is 24.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is 3.30x versus 3.53x for Enerpac Tool Group Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson Corp. has a net margin of 11.57% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 20.17%. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.58% beat Nordson Corp.'s return on equity of 16.37%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $262.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.01%. On the other hand Nordson Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $271.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.99%. Given that Nordson Corp. has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Nordson Corp. is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc..

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson Corp. has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.457%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Nordson Corp. offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson Corp. pays out 37.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Nordson Corp. quarterly revenues of $751.8M. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $122.6M is lower than Nordson Corp.'s net income of $151.6M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.29x while Nordson Corp.'s PE ratio is 28.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is 3.30x versus 4.93x for Nordson Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a net margin of 11.57% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.37%. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.58% beat Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $262.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.01%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $86.65 which suggests that it could grow by 16.08%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc..

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 24.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.385%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. offers a yield of 4.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. pays 35.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. pays out 172.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s is not.

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $122.6M is higher than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net income of $51.4M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.29x while Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is 3.30x versus 0.75x for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.