Financhill
Buy
71

LASR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$52.43
Seasonality move :
-8.98%
Day range:
$51.51 - $55.17
52-week range:
$6.20 - $55.31
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
11.90x
P/B ratio:
13.89x
Volume:
1.6M
Avg. volume:
1.1M
1-year change:
399.91%
Market cap:
$3B
Revenue:
$198.5M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.89

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
LASR
nLIGHT, Inc.
$76.7M $0.11 30.58% -64% $48.00
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$19.1B $2.02 35.22% 108.75% $458.59
MCHP
Microchip Technology, Inc.
$1.2B $0.43 30.07% 130.68% $86.88
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$12.9B $3.96 133.61% 502.04% $382.23
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
$144.3M $0.14 47.72% 197.83% $10.40
SPRS
Surge Components, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
LASR
nLIGHT, Inc.
$54.84 $48.00 $3B -- $0.00 0% 11.90x
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$342.76 $458.59 $1.6T 72.00x $0.65 0.71% 26.04x
MCHP
Microchip Technology, Inc.
$80.75 $86.88 $43.7B 87.75x $0.46 2.25% 10.01x
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$410.34 $382.23 $461.8B 39.01x $0.12 0.11% 10.95x
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
$9.79 $10.40 $1.6B 49.37x $0.00 0% 3.78x
SPRS
Surge Components, Inc.
$3.30 -- $18.8M 21.09x $0.00 0% 0.54x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
LASR
nLIGHT, Inc.
12.53% 7.226 2.08% 4.33x
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
44.98% 3.126 3.81% 1.53x
MCHP
Microchip Technology, Inc.
45.17% 2.801 15.67% 0.90x
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
17.52% 3.611 4.69% 1.52x
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
21.99% 2.427 13.4% 1.46x
SPRS
Surge Components, Inc.
5.23% 0.704 9.47% 3.60x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
LASR
nLIGHT, Inc.
$20.8M -$5.6M -17.84% -19.8% -8.34% $2.4M
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$11.8B $7.7B 16.64% 31.98% 42.53% $7.5B
MCHP
Microchip Technology, Inc.
$540.4M $156.5M -0.55% -1.04% 13.2% $296.9M
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
$7.6B $6.1B 17.9% 22.98% 44.95% $3B
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
$47.8M $18.7M 4.68% 5.89% 13.75% $9M
SPRS
Surge Components, Inc.
$2.8M $658.8K 4.28% 4.53% 6.41% $95.8K

nLIGHT, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns LASR or AVGO?

    Broadcom Inc. has a net margin of -10.3% compared to nLIGHT, Inc.'s net margin of 47.28%. nLIGHT, Inc.'s return on equity of -19.8% beat Broadcom Inc.'s return on equity of 31.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    31.09% -$0.14 $249.8M
    AVGO
    Broadcom Inc.
    65.22% $1.74 $147.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About LASR or AVGO?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -12.47%. On the other hand Broadcom Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $458.59 which suggests that it could grow by 33.79%. Given that Broadcom Inc. has higher upside potential than nLIGHT, Inc., analysts believe Broadcom Inc. is more attractive than nLIGHT, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    5 1 0
    AVGO
    Broadcom Inc.
    40 1 0
  • Is LASR or AVGO More Risky?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a beta of 2.335, which suggesting that the stock is 133.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom Inc. has a beta of 1.209, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.898%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LASR or AVGO?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom Inc. offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. nLIGHT, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom Inc. pays out 49.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LASR or AVGO?

    nLIGHT, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.7M, which are smaller than Broadcom Inc. quarterly revenues of $18B. nLIGHT, Inc.'s net income of -$6.9M is lower than Broadcom Inc.'s net income of $8.5B. Notably, nLIGHT, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadcom Inc.'s PE ratio is 72.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for nLIGHT, Inc. is 11.90x versus 26.04x for Broadcom Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    11.90x -- $66.7M -$6.9M
    AVGO
    Broadcom Inc.
    26.04x 72.00x $18B $8.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns LASR or MCHP?

    Microchip Technology, Inc. has a net margin of -10.3% compared to nLIGHT, Inc.'s net margin of 5.29%. nLIGHT, Inc.'s return on equity of -19.8% beat Microchip Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.04%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    31.09% -$0.14 $249.8M
    MCHP
    Microchip Technology, Inc.
    45.57% $0.06 $12B
  • What do Analysts Say About LASR or MCHP?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -12.47%. On the other hand Microchip Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $86.88 which suggests that it could grow by 7.59%. Given that Microchip Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than nLIGHT, Inc., analysts believe Microchip Technology, Inc. is more attractive than nLIGHT, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    5 1 0
    MCHP
    Microchip Technology, Inc.
    17 5 0
  • Is LASR or MCHP More Risky?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a beta of 2.335, which suggesting that the stock is 133.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.463, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.291%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LASR or MCHP?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microchip Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. nLIGHT, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology, Inc. pays out 195140% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LASR or MCHP?

    nLIGHT, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.7M, which are smaller than Microchip Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. nLIGHT, Inc.'s net income of -$6.9M is lower than Microchip Technology, Inc.'s net income of $62.7M. Notably, nLIGHT, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microchip Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 87.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for nLIGHT, Inc. is 11.90x versus 10.01x for Microchip Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    11.90x -- $66.7M -$6.9M
    MCHP
    Microchip Technology, Inc.
    10.01x 87.75x $1.2B $62.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns LASR or MU?

    Micron Technology, Inc. has a net margin of -10.3% compared to nLIGHT, Inc.'s net margin of 38.41%. nLIGHT, Inc.'s return on equity of -19.8% beat Micron Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    31.09% -$0.14 $249.8M
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    56% $4.60 $71.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About LASR or MU?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -12.47%. On the other hand Micron Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $382.23 which suggests that it could fall by -6.85%. Given that nLIGHT, Inc. has more downside risk than Micron Technology, Inc., analysts believe Micron Technology, Inc. is more attractive than nLIGHT, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    5 1 0
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    28 3 2
  • Is LASR or MU More Risky?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a beta of 2.335, which suggesting that the stock is 133.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.517, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.672%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LASR or MU?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. nLIGHT, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc. pays out 6.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LASR or MU?

    nLIGHT, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.7M, which are smaller than Micron Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.6B. nLIGHT, Inc.'s net income of -$6.9M is lower than Micron Technology, Inc.'s net income of $5.2B. Notably, nLIGHT, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Micron Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for nLIGHT, Inc. is 11.90x versus 10.95x for Micron Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    11.90x -- $66.7M -$6.9M
    MU
    Micron Technology, Inc.
    10.95x 39.01x $13.6B $5.2B
  • Which has Higher Returns LASR or SHLS?

    Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. has a net margin of -10.3% compared to nLIGHT, Inc.'s net margin of 8.75%. nLIGHT, Inc.'s return on equity of -19.8% beat Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    31.09% -$0.14 $249.8M
    SHLS
    Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
    35.19% $0.07 $755.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About LASR or SHLS?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -12.47%. On the other hand Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.40 which suggests that it could grow by 6.23%. Given that Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than nLIGHT, Inc., analysts believe Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. is more attractive than nLIGHT, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    5 1 0
    SHLS
    Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
    10 5 0
  • Is LASR or SHLS More Risky?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a beta of 2.335, which suggesting that the stock is 133.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.703, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.346%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LASR or SHLS?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. nLIGHT, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LASR or SHLS?

    nLIGHT, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.7M, which are smaller than Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $135.8M. nLIGHT, Inc.'s net income of -$6.9M is lower than Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s net income of $11.9M. Notably, nLIGHT, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 49.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for nLIGHT, Inc. is 11.90x versus 3.78x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    11.90x -- $66.7M -$6.9M
    SHLS
    Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
    3.78x 49.37x $135.8M $11.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns LASR or SPRS?

    Surge Components, Inc. has a net margin of -10.3% compared to nLIGHT, Inc.'s net margin of 4.6%. nLIGHT, Inc.'s return on equity of -19.8% beat Surge Components, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.53%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    31.09% -$0.14 $249.8M
    SPRS
    Surge Components, Inc.
    27.52% $0.08 $22M
  • What do Analysts Say About LASR or SPRS?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -12.47%. On the other hand Surge Components, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that nLIGHT, Inc. has higher upside potential than Surge Components, Inc., analysts believe nLIGHT, Inc. is more attractive than Surge Components, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    5 1 0
    SPRS
    Surge Components, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is LASR or SPRS More Risky?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a beta of 2.335, which suggesting that the stock is 133.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Surge Components, Inc. has a beta of 0.431, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.863%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LASR or SPRS?

    nLIGHT, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Surge Components, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. nLIGHT, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Surge Components, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LASR or SPRS?

    nLIGHT, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.7M, which are larger than Surge Components, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.3M. nLIGHT, Inc.'s net income of -$6.9M is lower than Surge Components, Inc.'s net income of $472.2K. Notably, nLIGHT, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Surge Components, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for nLIGHT, Inc. is 11.90x versus 0.54x for Surge Components, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LASR
    nLIGHT, Inc.
    11.90x -- $66.7M -$6.9M
    SPRS
    Surge Components, Inc.
    0.54x 21.09x $10.3M $472.2K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?

Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…

Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?

Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…

Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x

Alerts

Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12

Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.

Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12

Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.

Buy
77
VRT alert for Feb 12

Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock