Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
74
KRMA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$44.38
Seasonality move
:
1.18%
Day range:
$44.22 - $44.33
52-week range:
$31.96 - $44.64
Dividend yield:
0.84%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
4.7K
Avg. volume:
70.5K
1-year change:
8.13%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHGX
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HAPI
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
$44.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.84% | -- |
|
CHGX
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF
|
$25.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 1.15% | -- |
|
HAPI
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF
|
$41.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.18% | -- |
|
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF
|
$293.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.63 | 0.87% | -- |
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
$51.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 1.06% | -- |
|
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF
|
$43.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 1.03% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | 0.992 | -- | -- |
|
CHGX
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF
|
-- | 1.455 | -- | -- |
|
HAPI
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF
|
-- | 1.020 | -- | -- |
|
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF
|
-- | 1.123 | -- | -- |
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | 0.852 | -- | -- |
|
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF
|
-- | 1.023 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHGX
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HAPI
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KRMA or CHGX?
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Stance Sustainable Beta ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- CHGXStance Sustainable Beta ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KRMA or CHGX?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Stance Sustainable Beta ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conscious Companies ETF has higher upside potential than Stance Sustainable Beta ETF, analysts believe Global X Conscious Companies ETF is more attractive than Stance Sustainable Beta ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 CHGXStance Sustainable Beta ETF0 0 0 -
Is KRMA or CHGX More Risky?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stance Sustainable Beta ETF has a beta of 0.565, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.49%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KRMA or CHGX?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Stance Sustainable Beta ETF offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stance Sustainable Beta ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KRMA or CHGX?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Stance Sustainable Beta ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Stance Sustainable Beta ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conscious Companies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stance Sustainable Beta ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conscious Companies ETF is -- versus -- for Stance Sustainable Beta ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -- CHGXStance Sustainable Beta ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KRMA or HAPI?
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- HAPIHarbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KRMA or HAPI?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conscious Companies ETF has higher upside potential than Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF, analysts believe Global X Conscious Companies ETF is more attractive than Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 HAPIHarbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is KRMA or HAPI More Risky?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KRMA or HAPI?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KRMA or HAPI?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conscious Companies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conscious Companies ETF is -- versus -- for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -- HAPIHarbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KRMA or MMTM?
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- MMTMState Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KRMA or MMTM?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conscious Companies ETF has higher upside potential than State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF, analysts believe Global X Conscious Companies ETF is more attractive than State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 MMTMState Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF0 0 0 -
Is KRMA or MMTM More Risky?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.17199999999999%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KRMA or MMTM?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KRMA or MMTM?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conscious Companies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conscious Companies ETF is -- versus -- for State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -- MMTMState Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KRMA or PALC?
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KRMA or PALC?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conscious Companies ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF, analysts believe Global X Conscious Companies ETF is more attractive than Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 -
Is KRMA or PALC More Risky?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.994%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KRMA or PALC?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KRMA or PALC?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conscious Companies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conscious Companies ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -- PALCPacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KRMA or USNZ?
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- USNZXtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KRMA or USNZ?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conscious Companies ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF, analysts believe Global X Conscious Companies ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 USNZXtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF0 0 0 -
Is KRMA or USNZ More Risky?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KRMA or USNZ?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KRMA or USNZ?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conscious Companies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conscious Companies ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -- USNZXtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 105.84% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is up 1.85% over the past day.
Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is down 0.66% over the past day.
