Why Is Amkor Stock Up So Much?
Semiconductor packaging and testing major Amkor (NASDAQ:AMKR) has started 2026…
Buy
70
KRMA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$44.24
Seasonality move
:
0.15%
Day range:
$44.12 - $44.26
52-week range:
$31.96 - $44.99
Dividend yield:
2.55%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2K
Avg. volume:
45.4K
1-year change:
12.35%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHGX
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HAPI
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCHX
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
$44.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 2.55% | -- |
|
CHGX
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF
|
$25.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 1.15% | -- |
|
HAPI
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF
|
$41.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.36 | 0.85% | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
$92.09 | -- | -- | -- | $0.85 | 0.92% | -- |
|
SCHX
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
|
$27.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.07% | -- |
|
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF
|
$43.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 1.01% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | 0.960 | -- | -- |
|
CHGX
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF
|
-- | 1.455 | -- | -- |
|
HAPI
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF
|
-- | 1.016 | -- | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | 0.450 | -- | -- |
|
SCHX
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | 1.018 | -- | -- |
|
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF
|
-- | 1.014 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHGX
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HAPI
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCHX
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KRMA or CHGX?
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Stance Sustainable Beta ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- CHGXStance Sustainable Beta ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KRMA or CHGX?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Stance Sustainable Beta ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conscious Companies ETF has higher upside potential than Stance Sustainable Beta ETF, analysts believe Global X Conscious Companies ETF is more attractive than Stance Sustainable Beta ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 CHGXStance Sustainable Beta ETF0 0 0 -
Is KRMA or CHGX More Risky?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stance Sustainable Beta ETF has a beta of 0.565, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.49%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KRMA or CHGX?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. Stance Sustainable Beta ETF offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stance Sustainable Beta ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KRMA or CHGX?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Stance Sustainable Beta ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Stance Sustainable Beta ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conscious Companies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stance Sustainable Beta ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conscious Companies ETF is -- versus -- for Stance Sustainable Beta ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -- CHGXStance Sustainable Beta ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KRMA or HAPI?
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- HAPIHarbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KRMA or HAPI?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conscious Companies ETF has higher upside potential than Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF, analysts believe Global X Conscious Companies ETF is more attractive than Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 HAPIHarbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is KRMA or HAPI More Risky?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KRMA or HAPI?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KRMA or HAPI?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conscious Companies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conscious Companies ETF is -- versus -- for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -- HAPIHarbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KRMA or POWA?
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KRMA or POWA?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conscious Companies ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF, analysts believe Global X Conscious Companies ETF is more attractive than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF0 0 0 -
Is KRMA or POWA More Risky?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.068%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KRMA or POWA?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KRMA or POWA?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conscious Companies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conscious Companies ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -- POWAInvesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KRMA or SCHX?
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Schwab US Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- SCHXSchwab US Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KRMA or SCHX?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schwab US Large-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conscious Companies ETF has higher upside potential than Schwab US Large-Cap ETF, analysts believe Global X Conscious Companies ETF is more attractive than Schwab US Large-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 SCHXSchwab US Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is KRMA or SCHX More Risky?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schwab US Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.657%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KRMA or SCHX?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. Schwab US Large-Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schwab US Large-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KRMA or SCHX?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schwab US Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Schwab US Large-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conscious Companies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Schwab US Large-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conscious Companies ETF is -- versus -- for Schwab US Large-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -- SCHXSchwab US Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KRMA or USNZ?
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net margin of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- USNZXtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KRMA or USNZ?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Conscious Companies ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF, analysts believe Global X Conscious Companies ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 USNZXtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF0 0 0 -
Is KRMA or USNZ More Risky?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KRMA or USNZ?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KRMA or USNZ?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Conscious Companies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Conscious Companies ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -- USNZXtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Eq ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Shopify Stock a Good Buy Now?
eCommerce technology platform Shopify (NASDAQ:SHOP) delivered impressive returns in 2025…
Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?
2025 was another banner year for the Magnificent Seven stocks,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
100
ATGL alert for Jan 10
Alpha Technology Group Ltd. [ATGL] is up 47.05% over the past day.
Buy
71
NAIL alert for Jan 10
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 18.52% over the past day.
Buy
54
LGIH alert for Jan 10
LGI Homes, Inc. [LGIH] is up 13.81% over the past day.
