Is Enovix an Underrated Small Cap?
Enovix (NASDAQ:ENVX) is one of several small, innovative companies hoping…
Sell
46
CATH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$70.69
Seasonality move
:
4.91%
Day range:
$68.68 - $69.16
52-week range:
$58.39 - $74.20
Dividend yield:
0.98%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
107.3K
Avg. volume:
45.2K
1-year change:
9.48%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILCB
iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
|
$68.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.41 | 0.98% | -- |
|
ILCB
iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF
|
$78.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.24 | 1.28% | -- |
|
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
|
$67.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.47 | 1.19% | -- |
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
$37.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 0.95% | -- |
|
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
|
$98.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 1.15% | -- |
|
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF
|
$51.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 1.21% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
|
-- | 1.029 | -- | -- |
|
ILCB
iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.038 | -- | -- |
|
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
|
-- | 1.000 | -- | -- |
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | 0.985 | -- | -- |
|
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
|
-- | 1.031 | -- | -- |
|
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.031 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILCB
iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CATH or ILCB?
iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net margin of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- ILCBiShares Morningstar US Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CATH or ILCB?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF, analysts believe Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is more attractive than iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF0 0 0 ILCBiShares Morningstar US Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is CATH or ILCB More Risky?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.111%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CATH or ILCB?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CATH or ILCB?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Morningstar US Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- -- ILCBiShares Morningstar US Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CATH or JHML?
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net margin of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's return on equity of -- beat John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- JHMLJohn Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CATH or JHML?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has higher upside potential than John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF, analysts believe Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is more attractive than John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF0 0 0 JHMLJohn Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is CATH or JHML More Risky?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.055%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CATH or JHML?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CATH or JHML?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net income of -- is lower than John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is -- versus -- for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- -- JHMLJohn Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CATH or KRMA?
Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net margin of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Conscious Companies ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CATH or KRMA?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Conscious Companies ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Conscious Companies ETF, analysts believe Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is more attractive than Global X Conscious Companies ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF0 0 0 KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF0 0 0 -
Is CATH or KRMA More Risky?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Conscious Companies ETF has a beta of 1.019, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.87%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CATH or KRMA?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Global X Conscious Companies ETF offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Conscious Companies ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CATH or KRMA?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Conscious Companies ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Conscious Companies ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Conscious Companies ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Conscious Companies ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- -- KRMAGlobal X Conscious Companies ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CATH or SUSL?
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net margin of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- SUSLiShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CATH or SUSL?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has higher upside potential than iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF, analysts believe Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is more attractive than iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF0 0 0 SUSLiShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF0 0 0 -
Is CATH or SUSL More Risky?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.01%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CATH or SUSL?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CATH or SUSL?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is -- versus -- for iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- -- SUSLiShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CATH or USSG?
Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net margin of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- USSGXtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CATH or USSG?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF, analysts believe Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF0 0 0 USSGXtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is CATH or USSG More Risky?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.57%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CATH or USSG?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CATH or USSG?
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CATHGlobal X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF-- -- -- -- USSGXtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Are We Heading Toward a Recession?
Fears of a recession in 2025 grew at the end…
3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 31.05% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 12
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is down 8.77% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 12
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is up 3.84% over the past day.
