IRDM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Altice USA has a net margin of 14.15% compared to Iridium Communications's net margin of -2.42%. Iridium Communications's return on equity of 18.17% beat Altice USA's return on equity of --.

Iridium Communications has a consensus price target of $38.63, signalling upside risk potential of 48.5%. On the other hand Altice USA has an analysts' consensus of $2.85 which suggests that it could grow by 3%. Given that Iridium Communications has higher upside potential than Altice USA, analysts believe Iridium Communications is more attractive than Altice USA.

Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altice USA has a beta of 1.648, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.772%.

Iridium Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Altice USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iridium Communications pays 57.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Altice USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Iridium Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iridium Communications quarterly revenues are $214.9M, which are smaller than Altice USA quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Iridium Communications's net income of $30.4M is higher than Altice USA's net income of -$54.1M. Notably, Iridium Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.31x while Altice USA's PE ratio is 203.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iridium Communications is 3.60x versus 0.14x for Altice USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a net margin of 14.15% compared to Iridium Communications's net margin of -17.17%. Iridium Communications's return on equity of 18.17% beat Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of -49.24%.

Iridium Communications has a consensus price target of $38.63, signalling upside risk potential of 48.5%. On the other hand Cogent Communications Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $78.64 which suggests that it could grow by 59.51%. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than Iridium Communications, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than Iridium Communications.

Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.651%.

Iridium Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Cogent Communications Holdings offers a yield of 8.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Iridium Communications pays 57.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Cogent Communications Holdings pays out -92.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Iridium Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iridium Communications quarterly revenues are $214.9M, which are smaller than Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues of $252.3M. Iridium Communications's net income of $30.4M is higher than Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$43.3M. Notably, Iridium Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.31x while Cogent Communications Holdings's PE ratio is 92.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iridium Communications is 3.60x versus 2.27x for Cogent Communications Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies has a net margin of 14.15% compared to Iridium Communications's net margin of -6.32%. Iridium Communications's return on equity of 18.17% beat Lumen Technologies's return on equity of -75.79%.

Iridium Communications has a consensus price target of $38.63, signalling upside risk potential of 48.5%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 15.06%. Given that Iridium Communications has higher upside potential than Lumen Technologies, analysts believe Iridium Communications is more attractive than Lumen Technologies.

Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.833%.

Iridium Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Lumen Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iridium Communications pays 57.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -5.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Iridium Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iridium Communications quarterly revenues are $214.9M, which are smaller than Lumen Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Iridium Communications's net income of $30.4M is higher than Lumen Technologies's net income of -$201M. Notably, Iridium Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.31x while Lumen Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iridium Communications is 3.60x versus 0.32x for Lumen Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verizon Communications has a net margin of 14.15% compared to Iridium Communications's net margin of 14.57%. Iridium Communications's return on equity of 18.17% beat Verizon Communications's return on equity of 18.02%.

Iridium Communications has a consensus price target of $38.63, signalling upside risk potential of 48.5%. On the other hand Verizon Communications has an analysts' consensus of $48.07 which suggests that it could grow by 10.22%. Given that Iridium Communications has higher upside potential than Verizon Communications, analysts believe Iridium Communications is more attractive than Verizon Communications.

Iridium Communications has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.387, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.334%.

Iridium Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Verizon Communications offers a yield of 6.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Iridium Communications pays 57.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Verizon Communications pays out 64.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iridium Communications quarterly revenues are $214.9M, which are smaller than Verizon Communications quarterly revenues of $33.5B. Iridium Communications's net income of $30.4M is lower than Verizon Communications's net income of $4.9B. Notably, Iridium Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.31x while Verizon Communications's PE ratio is 10.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iridium Communications is 3.60x versus 1.36x for Verizon Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.