IIIV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus, Inc. has a net margin of 2.73% compared to i3 Verticals, Inc.'s net margin of 6.27%. i3 Verticals, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.96% beat ePlus, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.57%.

i3 Verticals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.17, signalling upside risk potential of 37.49%. On the other hand ePlus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5%. Given that i3 Verticals, Inc. has higher upside potential than ePlus, Inc., analysts believe i3 Verticals, Inc. is more attractive than ePlus, Inc..

i3 Verticals, Inc. has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.55%.

i3 Verticals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus, Inc. offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. i3 Verticals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $54.9M, which are smaller than ePlus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $608.8M. i3 Verticals, Inc.'s net income of $1.5M is lower than ePlus, Inc.'s net income of $38.2M. Notably, i3 Verticals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 150.06x while ePlus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals, Inc. is 3.12x versus 1.03x for ePlus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet, Inc. has a net margin of 2.73% compared to i3 Verticals, Inc.'s net margin of 18.25%. i3 Verticals, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.96% beat Red Violet, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.97%.

i3 Verticals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.17, signalling upside risk potential of 37.49%. On the other hand Red Violet, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $67.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.45%. Given that i3 Verticals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Red Violet, Inc., analysts believe i3 Verticals, Inc. is more attractive than Red Violet, Inc..

i3 Verticals, Inc. has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet, Inc. has a beta of 1.688, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.755%.

i3 Verticals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. i3 Verticals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $54.9M, which are larger than Red Violet, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.1M. i3 Verticals, Inc.'s net income of $1.5M is lower than Red Violet, Inc.'s net income of $4.2M. Notably, i3 Verticals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 150.06x while Red Violet, Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals, Inc. is 3.12x versus 8.43x for Red Violet, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 2.73% compared to i3 Verticals, Inc.'s net margin of 0.9%. i3 Verticals, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.96% beat Tenable Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.9%.

i3 Verticals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.17, signalling upside risk potential of 37.49%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $36.42 which suggests that it could grow by 64.65%. Given that Tenable Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, Inc., analysts believe Tenable Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than i3 Verticals, Inc..

i3 Verticals, Inc. has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.636, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.375%.

i3 Verticals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $54.9M, which are smaller than Tenable Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $252.4M. i3 Verticals, Inc.'s net income of $1.5M is lower than Tenable Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.3M. Notably, i3 Verticals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 150.06x while Tenable Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals, Inc. is 3.12x versus 2.76x for Tenable Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software, Inc. has a net margin of 2.73% compared to i3 Verticals, Inc.'s net margin of -2.22%. i3 Verticals, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.96% beat Upland Software, Inc.'s return on equity of -41.93%.

i3 Verticals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.17, signalling upside risk potential of 37.49%. On the other hand Upland Software, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could grow by 190.83%. Given that Upland Software, Inc. has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, Inc., analysts believe Upland Software, Inc. is more attractive than i3 Verticals, Inc..

i3 Verticals, Inc. has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software, Inc. has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.609%.

i3 Verticals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $54.9M, which are larger than Upland Software, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. i3 Verticals, Inc.'s net income of $1.5M is higher than Upland Software, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, i3 Verticals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 150.06x while Upland Software, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals, Inc. is 3.12x versus 0.18x for Upland Software, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.