Will NVIDIA Return to Its 52-Week High?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been among the best-performing investments of the…
Sell
48
ICOP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.28
Seasonality move
:
3.34%
Day range:
$23.72 - $24.44
52-week range:
$21.10 - $35.41
Dividend yield:
1.97%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
27.8K
Avg. volume:
20.1K
1-year change:
-21.36%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
|
$24.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 1.97% | -- |
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
$7.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.28 | 3.63% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$29.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 3.32% | -- |
|
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF
|
$12.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 3.84% | -- |
|
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
|
$59.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0.95% | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
$78.87 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 1.27% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
|
-- | 0.078 | -- | -- |
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | 0.638 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 1.146 | -- | -- |
|
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF
|
-- | 0.263 | -- | -- |
|
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.579 | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | 1.463 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ICOP or BATT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net margin of --. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ICOP or BATT?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF, analysts believe iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF is more attractive than Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF0 0 0 BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 -
Is ICOP or BATT More Risky?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.821%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ICOP or BATT?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ICOP or BATT?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- -- BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ICOP or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net margin of --. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ICOP or CUT?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is ICOP or CUT More Risky?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.193%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ICOP or CUT?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ICOP or CUT?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ICOP or FTRI?
First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net margin of --. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- FTRIFirst Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ICOP or FTRI?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF, analysts believe iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF is more attractive than First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF0 0 0 FTRIFirst Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF0 0 0 -
Is ICOP or FTRI More Risky?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.155%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ICOP or FTRI?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ICOP or FTRI?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- -- FTRIFirst Trust Indxx Global Natural ResourcesETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ICOP or PSCM?
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net margin of --. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- PSCMInvesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ICOP or PSCM?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF, analysts believe iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF0 0 0 PSCMInvesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is ICOP or PSCM More Risky?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.425%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ICOP or PSCM?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ICOP or PSCM?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- -- PSCMInvesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ICOP or PYZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net margin of --. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ICOP or PYZ?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF, analysts believe iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF0 0 0 PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF0 0 0 -
Is ICOP or PYZ More Risky?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has a beta of 1.391, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.065%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ICOP or PYZ?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ICOP or PYZ?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- -- PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will JP Morgan’s AI Advisor Be a Winner?
JPMorgan Chase is rolling out “JPM WealthAI for high-net-worth clients.…
Is Revolve Group Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Recently, Revolve Group (NYSE:RVLV) management delivered some fairly positive business…
Stock Ideas
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 29.14% over the past day.
Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 12
Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 26.73% over the past day.
Buy
89
GDXU alert for Apr 12
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 15.9% over the past day.
