HSTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HealthEquity has a net margin of 7.83% compared to HealthStream's net margin of 1.9%. HealthStream's return on equity of 5.69% beat HealthEquity's return on equity of 4.65%.

HealthStream has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.78%. On the other hand HealthEquity has an analysts' consensus of $113.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.5%. Given that HealthEquity has higher upside potential than HealthStream, analysts believe HealthEquity is more attractive than HealthStream.

HealthStream has a beta of 0.396, which suggesting that the stock is 60.425% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HealthEquity has a beta of 0.543, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.653%.

HealthStream has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. HealthEquity offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HealthStream pays 20.1% of its earnings as a dividend. HealthEquity pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. HealthStream's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HealthStream quarterly revenues are $73.1M, which are smaller than HealthEquity quarterly revenues of $300.4M. HealthStream's net income of $5.7M is higher than HealthEquity's net income of $5.7M. Notably, HealthStream's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.62x while HealthEquity's PE ratio is 90.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HealthStream is 3.42x versus 7.58x for HealthEquity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schrodinger has a net margin of 7.83% compared to HealthStream's net margin of -108.07%. HealthStream's return on equity of 5.69% beat Schrodinger's return on equity of -34.83%.

HealthStream has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.78%. On the other hand Schrodinger has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.3%. Given that Schrodinger has higher upside potential than HealthStream, analysts believe Schrodinger is more attractive than HealthStream.

HealthStream has a beta of 0.396, which suggesting that the stock is 60.425% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schrodinger has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HealthStream has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Schrodinger offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HealthStream pays 20.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Schrodinger pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. HealthStream's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HealthStream quarterly revenues are $73.1M, which are larger than Schrodinger quarterly revenues of $35.3M. HealthStream's net income of $5.7M is higher than Schrodinger's net income of -$38.1M. Notably, HealthStream's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.62x while Schrodinger's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HealthStream is 3.42x versus 8.01x for Schrodinger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simulations Plus has a net margin of 7.83% compared to HealthStream's net margin of 4.52%. HealthStream's return on equity of 5.69% beat Simulations Plus's return on equity of 5.64%.

HealthStream has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.78%. On the other hand Simulations Plus has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.53%. Given that Simulations Plus has higher upside potential than HealthStream, analysts believe Simulations Plus is more attractive than HealthStream.

HealthStream has a beta of 0.396, which suggesting that the stock is 60.425% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simulations Plus has a beta of 0.797, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.306%.

HealthStream has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Simulations Plus offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. HealthStream pays 20.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Simulations Plus pays out 48.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HealthStream quarterly revenues are $73.1M, which are larger than Simulations Plus quarterly revenues of $18.7M. HealthStream's net income of $5.7M is higher than Simulations Plus's net income of $843K. Notably, HealthStream's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.62x while Simulations Plus's PE ratio is 62.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HealthStream is 3.42x versus 8.82x for Simulations Plus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.