HSTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Scienture Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 7.96% compared to HealthStream, Inc.'s net margin of -611.42%. HealthStream, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.82% beat Scienture Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.88%.

HealthStream, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.38%. On the other hand Scienture Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1223.53%. Given that Scienture Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than HealthStream, Inc., analysts believe Scienture Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than HealthStream, Inc..

HealthStream, Inc. has a beta of 0.425, which suggesting that the stock is 57.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scienture Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 3.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 201.045%.

HealthStream, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Scienture Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. HealthStream, Inc. pays 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Scienture Holdings, Inc. pays out 81.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HealthStream, Inc. quarterly revenues are $76.5M, which are larger than Scienture Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $590K. HealthStream, Inc.'s net income of $6.1M is higher than Scienture Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.6M. Notably, HealthStream, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.81x while Scienture Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HealthStream, Inc. is 2.35x versus 10.01x for Scienture Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schrödinger, Inc. has a net margin of 7.96% compared to HealthStream, Inc.'s net margin of -60.37%. HealthStream, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.82% beat Schrödinger, Inc.'s return on equity of -46.11%.

HealthStream, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.38%. On the other hand Schrödinger, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.22 which suggests that it could grow by 52.25%. Given that Schrödinger, Inc. has higher upside potential than HealthStream, Inc., analysts believe Schrödinger, Inc. is more attractive than HealthStream, Inc..

HealthStream, Inc. has a beta of 0.425, which suggesting that the stock is 57.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schrödinger, Inc. has a beta of 1.537, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.662%.

HealthStream, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Schrödinger, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HealthStream, Inc. pays 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Schrödinger, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. HealthStream, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HealthStream, Inc. quarterly revenues are $76.5M, which are larger than Schrödinger, Inc. quarterly revenues of $54.3M. HealthStream, Inc.'s net income of $6.1M is higher than Schrödinger, Inc.'s net income of -$32.8M. Notably, HealthStream, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.81x while Schrödinger, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HealthStream, Inc. is 2.35x versus 5.10x for Schrödinger, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simulations Plus, Inc. has a net margin of 7.96% compared to HealthStream, Inc.'s net margin of -330.59%. HealthStream, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.82% beat Simulations Plus, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.69%.

HealthStream, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.38%. On the other hand Simulations Plus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.33 which suggests that it could grow by 22.51%. Given that HealthStream, Inc. has higher upside potential than Simulations Plus, Inc., analysts believe HealthStream, Inc. is more attractive than Simulations Plus, Inc..

HealthStream, Inc. has a beta of 0.425, which suggesting that the stock is 57.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simulations Plus, Inc. has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.303%.

HealthStream, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Simulations Plus, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. HealthStream, Inc. pays 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Simulations Plus, Inc. pays out -48.18% of its earnings as a dividend. HealthStream, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HealthStream, Inc. quarterly revenues are $76.5M, which are larger than Simulations Plus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $20.4M. HealthStream, Inc.'s net income of $6.1M is higher than Simulations Plus, Inc.'s net income of -$67.3M. Notably, HealthStream, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.81x while Simulations Plus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 49.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HealthStream, Inc. is 2.35x versus 4.65x for Simulations Plus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veeva Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 7.96% compared to HealthStream, Inc.'s net margin of 29.12%. HealthStream, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.82% beat Veeva Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.78%.

HealthStream, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.38%. On the other hand Veeva Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $312.18 which suggests that it could grow by 39.85%. Given that HealthStream, Inc. has higher upside potential than Veeva Systems, Inc., analysts believe HealthStream, Inc. is more attractive than Veeva Systems, Inc..

HealthStream, Inc. has a beta of 0.425, which suggesting that the stock is 57.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veeva Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.949%.

HealthStream, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Veeva Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HealthStream, Inc. pays 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Veeva Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. HealthStream, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HealthStream, Inc. quarterly revenues are $76.5M, which are smaller than Veeva Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $811.2M. HealthStream, Inc.'s net income of $6.1M is lower than Veeva Systems, Inc.'s net income of $236.2M. Notably, HealthStream, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.81x while Veeva Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 43.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HealthStream, Inc. is 2.35x versus 12.11x for Veeva Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.