HNST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

e.l.f. Beauty has a net margin of 0.17% compared to The Honest's net margin of 6.32%. The Honest's return on equity of -3.3% beat e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 16.85%.

The Honest has a consensus price target of $7.14, signalling upside risk potential of 3.67%. On the other hand e.l.f. Beauty has an analysts' consensus of $157.19 which suggests that it could grow by 22.17%. Given that e.l.f. Beauty has higher upside potential than The Honest, analysts believe e.l.f. Beauty is more attractive than The Honest.

The Honest has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.487, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.661%.

The Honest has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. e.l.f. Beauty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Honest pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. e.l.f. Beauty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Honest quarterly revenues are $99.2M, which are smaller than e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues of $301.1M. The Honest's net income of $165K is lower than e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $19M. Notably, The Honest's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while e.l.f. Beauty's PE ratio is 69.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Honest is 1.85x versus 6.17x for e.l.f. Beauty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 0.17% compared to The Honest's net margin of 18.32%. The Honest's return on equity of -3.3% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 224.09%.

The Honest has a consensus price target of $7.14, signalling upside risk potential of 3.67%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $149.83 which suggests that it could grow by 14.1%. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than The Honest, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than The Honest.

The Honest has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.809%.

The Honest has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. The Honest pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Honest quarterly revenues are $99.2M, which are smaller than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $5B. The Honest's net income of $165K is lower than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $907M. Notably, The Honest's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 17.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Honest is 1.85x versus 2.21x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nu Skin Enterprises has a net margin of 0.17% compared to The Honest's net margin of 1.93%. The Honest's return on equity of -3.3% beat Nu Skin Enterprises's return on equity of -13.41%.

The Honest has a consensus price target of $7.14, signalling upside risk potential of 3.67%. On the other hand Nu Skin Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $6.92 which suggests that it could grow by 4.8%. Given that Nu Skin Enterprises has higher upside potential than The Honest, analysts believe Nu Skin Enterprises is more attractive than The Honest.

The Honest has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nu Skin Enterprises has a beta of 1.200, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.046%.

The Honest has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nu Skin Enterprises offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. The Honest pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nu Skin Enterprises pays out 903.11% of its earnings as a dividend.

The Honest quarterly revenues are $99.2M, which are smaller than Nu Skin Enterprises quarterly revenues of $430.1M. The Honest's net income of $165K is lower than Nu Skin Enterprises's net income of $8.3M. Notably, The Honest's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nu Skin Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Honest is 1.85x versus 0.18x for Nu Skin Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 0.17% compared to The Honest's net margin of 3.7%. The Honest's return on equity of -3.3% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

The Honest has a consensus price target of $7.14, signalling upside risk potential of 3.67%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.76%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than The Honest, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than The Honest.

The Honest has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.272%.

The Honest has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. The Honest pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Honest quarterly revenues are $99.2M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. The Honest's net income of $165K is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, The Honest's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Honest is 1.85x versus 0.88x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.