Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
72
HIFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$314.12
Seasonality move
:
4.02%
Day range:
$311.52 - $319.75
52-week range:
$209.71 - $338.00
Dividend yield:
0.8%
P/E ratio:
12.71x
P/S ratio:
2.93x
P/B ratio:
1.43x
Volume:
35.4K
Avg. volume:
61.9K
1-year change:
16.24%
Market cap:
$686.3M
Revenue:
$236.7M
EPS (TTM):
$24.75
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AX
Axos Financial, Inc.
|
$345.9M | $2.07 | -20.63% | 17.67% | $112.00 |
|
BBT
BB&T
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BYFC
Broadway Financial Corp. (California)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CARV
Carver Bancorp, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SFBC
Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings
|
$314.50 | -- | $686.3M | 12.71x | $1.33 | 0.8% | 2.93x |
|
AX
Axos Financial, Inc.
|
$97.32 | $112.00 | $5.5B | 12.32x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.79x |
|
BBT
BB&T
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BYFC
Broadway Financial Corp. (California)
|
$8.10 | -- | $74.4M | 173.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.16x |
|
CARV
Carver Bancorp, Inc.
|
$1.40 | -- | $7.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.19x |
|
SFBC
Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
|
$43.56 | -- | $104.1M | 15.73x | $0.21 | 1.79% | 1.82x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings
|
75.32% | 0.466 | 236.22% | 0.00x |
|
AX
Axos Financial, Inc.
|
29.82% | 0.950 | 25.5% | 0.00x |
|
BBT
BB&T
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
BYFC
Broadway Financial Corp. (California)
|
31.78% | 0.499 | 61.33% | 0.00x |
|
CARV
Carver Bancorp, Inc.
|
74.78% | 4.163 | 269.56% | 0.00x |
|
SFBC
Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
|
16.41% | -0.253 | 20.59% | 0.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings
|
-- | $27M | 2.79% | 12.09% | 88.01% | $11.1M |
|
AX
Axos Financial, Inc.
|
-- | $175.5M | 12.68% | 16.88% | 63.05% | $88.1M |
|
BBT
BB&T
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BYFC
Broadway Financial Corp. (California)
|
-- | $749K | 0.11% | 0.23% | 50.62% | $6.1M |
|
CARV
Carver Bancorp, Inc.
|
-- | -$2M | -12.63% | -31.83% | 15.69% | -$1.7M |
|
SFBC
Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
|
-- | $2.6M | 5% | 6.74% | 53.74% | $3M |
Hingham Institution for Savings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HIFS or AX?
Axos Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 30.99% compared to Hingham Institution for Savings's net margin of 22.64%. Hingham Institution for Savings's return on equity of 12.09% beat Axos Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIFSHingham Institution for Savings-- $9.39 $1.9B AXAxos Financial, Inc.-- $2.22 $4.2B -
What do Analysts Say About HIFS or AX?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Axos Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $112.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.08%. Given that Axos Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hingham Institution for Savings, analysts believe Axos Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Hingham Institution for Savings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIFSHingham Institution for Savings0 0 0 AXAxos Financial, Inc.3 1 0 -
Is HIFS or AX More Risky?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 1.961% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Axos Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.042%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIFS or AX?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Axos Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hingham Institution for Savings pays 10.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Axos Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIFS or AX?
Hingham Institution for Savings quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are smaller than Axos Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $567.2M. Hingham Institution for Savings's net income of $20.7M is lower than Axos Financial, Inc.'s net income of $128.4M. Notably, Hingham Institution for Savings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.71x while Axos Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hingham Institution for Savings is 2.93x versus 2.79x for Axos Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIFSHingham Institution for Savings2.93x 12.71x $66.8M $20.7M AXAxos Financial, Inc.2.79x 12.32x $567.2M $128.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns HIFS or BBT?
BB&T has a net margin of 30.99% compared to Hingham Institution for Savings's net margin of --. Hingham Institution for Savings's return on equity of 12.09% beat BB&T's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIFSHingham Institution for Savings-- $9.39 $1.9B BBTBB&T-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HIFS or BBT?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BB&T has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hingham Institution for Savings has higher upside potential than BB&T, analysts believe Hingham Institution for Savings is more attractive than BB&T.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIFSHingham Institution for Savings0 0 0 BBTBB&T0 0 0 -
Is HIFS or BBT More Risky?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 1.961% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BB&T has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIFS or BBT?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. BB&T offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hingham Institution for Savings pays 10.18% of its earnings as a dividend. BB&T pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIFS or BBT?
Hingham Institution for Savings quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are larger than BB&T quarterly revenues of --. Hingham Institution for Savings's net income of $20.7M is higher than BB&T's net income of --. Notably, Hingham Institution for Savings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.71x while BB&T's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hingham Institution for Savings is 2.93x versus -- for BB&T. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIFSHingham Institution for Savings2.93x 12.71x $66.8M $20.7M BBTBB&T-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HIFS or BYFC?
Broadway Financial Corp. (California) has a net margin of 30.99% compared to Hingham Institution for Savings's net margin of 4.12%. Hingham Institution for Savings's return on equity of 12.09% beat Broadway Financial Corp. (California)'s return on equity of 0.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIFSHingham Institution for Savings-- $9.39 $1.9B BYFCBroadway Financial Corp. (California)-- -- $418.8M -
What do Analysts Say About HIFS or BYFC?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Broadway Financial Corp. (California) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hingham Institution for Savings has higher upside potential than Broadway Financial Corp. (California), analysts believe Hingham Institution for Savings is more attractive than Broadway Financial Corp. (California).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIFSHingham Institution for Savings0 0 0 BYFCBroadway Financial Corp. (California)0 0 0 -
Is HIFS or BYFC More Risky?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 1.961% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadway Financial Corp. (California) has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.496%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIFS or BYFC?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Broadway Financial Corp. (California) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hingham Institution for Savings pays 10.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadway Financial Corp. (California) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIFS or BYFC?
Hingham Institution for Savings quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are larger than Broadway Financial Corp. (California) quarterly revenues of $14.5M. Hingham Institution for Savings's net income of $20.7M is higher than Broadway Financial Corp. (California)'s net income of $597K. Notably, Hingham Institution for Savings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.71x while Broadway Financial Corp. (California)'s PE ratio is 173.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hingham Institution for Savings is 2.93x versus 1.16x for Broadway Financial Corp. (California). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIFSHingham Institution for Savings2.93x 12.71x $66.8M $20.7M BYFCBroadway Financial Corp. (California)1.16x 173.00x $14.5M $597K
-
Which has Higher Returns HIFS or CARV?
Carver Bancorp, Inc. has a net margin of 30.99% compared to Hingham Institution for Savings's net margin of -16.94%. Hingham Institution for Savings's return on equity of 12.09% beat Carver Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of -31.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIFSHingham Institution for Savings-- $9.39 $1.9B CARVCarver Bancorp, Inc.-- -$0.34 $100.8M -
What do Analysts Say About HIFS or CARV?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Carver Bancorp, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21328.56%. Given that Carver Bancorp, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hingham Institution for Savings, analysts believe Carver Bancorp, Inc. is more attractive than Hingham Institution for Savings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIFSHingham Institution for Savings0 0 0 CARVCarver Bancorp, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is HIFS or CARV More Risky?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 1.961% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carver Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 1.629, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.916%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIFS or CARV?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Carver Bancorp, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hingham Institution for Savings pays 10.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Carver Bancorp, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIFS or CARV?
Hingham Institution for Savings quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are larger than Carver Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.1M. Hingham Institution for Savings's net income of $20.7M is higher than Carver Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Hingham Institution for Savings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.71x while Carver Bancorp, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hingham Institution for Savings is 2.93x versus 0.19x for Carver Bancorp, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIFSHingham Institution for Savings2.93x 12.71x $66.8M $20.7M CARVCarver Bancorp, Inc.0.19x -- $10.1M -$1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns HIFS or SFBC?
Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. has a net margin of 30.99% compared to Hingham Institution for Savings's net margin of 14.71%. Hingham Institution for Savings's return on equity of 12.09% beat Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIFSHingham Institution for Savings-- $9.39 $1.9B SFBCSound Financial Bancorp, Inc.-- $0.87 $130.9M -
What do Analysts Say About HIFS or SFBC?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hingham Institution for Savings has higher upside potential than Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc., analysts believe Hingham Institution for Savings is more attractive than Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIFSHingham Institution for Savings0 0 0 SFBCSound Financial Bancorp, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is HIFS or SFBC More Risky?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 1.961% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.111, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.88%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIFS or SFBC?
Hingham Institution for Savings has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Hingham Institution for Savings pays 10.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. pays out 27.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIFS or SFBC?
Hingham Institution for Savings quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are larger than Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.3M. Hingham Institution for Savings's net income of $20.7M is higher than Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Hingham Institution for Savings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.71x while Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hingham Institution for Savings is 2.93x versus 1.82x for Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIFSHingham Institution for Savings2.93x 12.71x $66.8M $20.7M SFBCSound Financial Bancorp, Inc.1.82x 15.73x $15.3M $2.2M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 23
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is down 8.66% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 23
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 2.94% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 23
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is down 5.19% over the past day.
