HIFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Pathward Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 30.99% compared to Hingham Institution for Savings's net margin of 20.24%. Hingham Institution for Savings's return on equity of 12.09% beat Pathward Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.35%.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pathward Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $100.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.75%. Given that Pathward Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hingham Institution for Savings, analysts believe Pathward Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pathward Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.215%.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Pathward Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Hingham Institution for Savings pays 10.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Pathward Financial, Inc. pays out 2.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hingham Institution for Savings quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are smaller than Pathward Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $175M. Hingham Institution for Savings's net income of $20.7M is lower than Pathward Financial, Inc.'s net income of $35.4M. Notably, Hingham Institution for Savings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.06x while Pathward Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hingham Institution for Savings is 2.78x versus 2.47x for Pathward Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 30.99% compared to Hingham Institution for Savings's net margin of 18.22%. Hingham Institution for Savings's return on equity of 12.09% beat Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 7%.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.85%. Given that Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hingham Institution for Savings, analysts believe Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.688, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.153%.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 4.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Hingham Institution for Savings pays 10.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. pays out 65.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hingham Institution for Savings quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are smaller than Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $111.5M. Hingham Institution for Savings's net income of $20.7M is higher than Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.'s net income of $20.3M. Notably, Hingham Institution for Savings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.06x while Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hingham Institution for Savings is 2.78x versus 2.20x for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. has a net margin of 30.99% compared to Hingham Institution for Savings's net margin of 16.62%. Hingham Institution for Savings's return on equity of 12.09% beat Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.63%.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $38.60 which suggests that it could grow by 13.46%. Given that Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hingham Institution for Savings, analysts believe Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. is more attractive than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. has a beta of 1.197, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.746%.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Hingham Institution for Savings pays 10.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. pays out 42.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hingham Institution for Savings quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are smaller than Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. quarterly revenues of $191.6M. Hingham Institution for Savings's net income of $20.7M is lower than Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.'s net income of $31.9M. Notably, Hingham Institution for Savings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.06x while Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hingham Institution for Savings is 2.78x versus 1.98x for Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. has a net margin of 30.99% compared to Hingham Institution for Savings's net margin of 14.71%. Hingham Institution for Savings's return on equity of 12.09% beat Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.74%.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hingham Institution for Savings has higher upside potential than Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc., analysts believe Hingham Institution for Savings is more attractive than Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc..

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.105, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.548%.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Hingham Institution for Savings pays 10.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. pays out 27.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hingham Institution for Savings quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are larger than Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.3M. Hingham Institution for Savings's net income of $20.7M is higher than Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Hingham Institution for Savings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.06x while Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hingham Institution for Savings is 2.78x versus 1.84x for Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.