HDSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 12.6% compared to Hudson Technologies's net margin of -0.63%. Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 12.93% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Hudson Technologies has a consensus price target of $14.44, signalling upside risk potential of 20.67%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hudson Technologies has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Hudson Technologies is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Hudson Technologies has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.501% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.118%.

Hudson Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Hudson Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues are $61.9M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Hudson Technologies's net income of $7.8M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Hudson Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.32x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Technologies is 1.16x versus 0.23x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Linde PLC has a net margin of 12.6% compared to Hudson Technologies's net margin of 18.55%. Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 12.93% beat Linde PLC's return on equity of 15.82%.

Hudson Technologies has a consensus price target of $14.44, signalling upside risk potential of 20.67%. On the other hand Linde PLC has an analysts' consensus of $493.05 which suggests that it could grow by 19.41%. Given that Hudson Technologies has higher upside potential than Linde PLC, analysts believe Hudson Technologies is more attractive than Linde PLC.

Hudson Technologies has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.501% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linde PLC has a beta of 0.945, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.525%.

Hudson Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Linde PLC offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.39 per share. Hudson Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Linde PLC pays out 40.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Linde PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues are $61.9M, which are smaller than Linde PLC quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Hudson Technologies's net income of $7.8M is lower than Linde PLC's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Hudson Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.32x while Linde PLC's PE ratio is 31.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Technologies is 1.16x versus 6.06x for Linde PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 12.6% compared to Hudson Technologies's net margin of --. Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 12.93% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Hudson Technologies has a consensus price target of $14.44, signalling upside risk potential of 20.67%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 234.92%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Hudson Technologies, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Hudson Technologies.

Hudson Technologies has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.501% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Hudson Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudson Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues are $61.9M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Hudson Technologies's net income of $7.8M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Hudson Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.32x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Technologies is 1.16x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 12.6% compared to Hudson Technologies's net margin of --. Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 12.93% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Hudson Technologies has a consensus price target of $14.44, signalling upside risk potential of 20.67%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 149.46%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Hudson Technologies, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Hudson Technologies.

Hudson Technologies has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.501% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

Hudson Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudson Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues are $61.9M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Hudson Technologies's net income of $7.8M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Hudson Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.32x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Technologies is 1.16x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.