GREE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innventure has a net margin of -51.55% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of -697.48%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Innventure's return on equity of --.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 110.53%. On the other hand Innventure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than Innventure, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than Innventure.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innventure has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innventure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innventure pays out -0.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $12.4M, which are larger than Innventure quarterly revenues of $317K. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$6.4M is lower than Innventure's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Innventure's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.28x versus 596.90x for Innventure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OFS Capital has a net margin of -51.55% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of 64.72%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat OFS Capital's return on equity of -0.73%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 110.53%. On the other hand OFS Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.52%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than OFS Capital, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than OFS Capital.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OFS Capital has a beta of 1.770, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.047%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OFS Capital offers a yield of 16.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OFS Capital pays out -3861.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $12.4M, which are larger than OFS Capital quarterly revenues of $2.6M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$6.4M is lower than OFS Capital's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while OFS Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.28x versus 31.08x for OFS Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -51.55% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of -182.06%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 110.53%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.90 which suggests that it could grow by 54.84%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 314.543%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $12.4M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $84.8M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$6.4M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 57.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.28x versus 9.30x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stronghold Digital Mining has a net margin of -51.55% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of -242.91%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Stronghold Digital Mining's return on equity of -83.83%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 110.53%. On the other hand Stronghold Digital Mining has an analysts' consensus of $7.25 which suggests that it could grow by 76.83%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than Stronghold Digital Mining, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than Stronghold Digital Mining.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stronghold Digital Mining has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stronghold Digital Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stronghold Digital Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $12.4M, which are larger than Stronghold Digital Mining quarterly revenues of $8M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$6.4M is higher than Stronghold Digital Mining's net income of -$19.5M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stronghold Digital Mining's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.28x versus 0.70x for Stronghold Digital Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.