GNLN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alico, Inc. has a net margin of -1212.08% compared to Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -1059.85%. Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -177.79% beat Alico, Inc.'s return on equity of -85.46%.

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1933541.9%. On the other hand Alico, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.91%. Given that Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alico, Inc., analysts believe Greenlane Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Alico, Inc..

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alico, Inc. has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.142%.

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alico, Inc. offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Greenlane Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alico, Inc. pays out 21.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Alico, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $737K, which are smaller than Alico, Inc. quarterly revenues of $802K. Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$8.9M is lower than Alico, Inc.'s net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alico, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. is 2.51x versus 6.49x for Alico, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Local Bounti Corp. has a net margin of -1212.08% compared to Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -216.64%. Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -177.79% beat Local Bounti Corp.'s return on equity of -466.66%.

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1933541.9%. On the other hand Local Bounti Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 155.32%. Given that Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Local Bounti Corp., analysts believe Greenlane Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Local Bounti Corp..

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Local Bounti Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Local Bounti Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Local Bounti Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $737K, which are smaller than Local Bounti Corp. quarterly revenues of $12.2M. Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$8.9M is higher than Local Bounti Corp.'s net income of -$26.4M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Local Bounti Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. is 2.51x versus 0.68x for Local Bounti Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pioneer Green Farms, Inc. has a net margin of -1212.08% compared to Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -3784581.4%. Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -177.79% beat Pioneer Green Farms, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1933541.9%. On the other hand Pioneer Green Farms, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pioneer Green Farms, Inc., analysts believe Greenlane Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Pioneer Green Farms, Inc..

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pioneer Green Farms, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pioneer Green Farms, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pioneer Green Farms, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $737K, which are larger than Pioneer Green Farms, Inc. quarterly revenues of $40. Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$8.9M is lower than Pioneer Green Farms, Inc.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pioneer Green Farms, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. is 2.51x versus 238.20x for Pioneer Green Farms, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

22nd Century Group, Inc. has a net margin of -1212.08% compared to Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -93.82%. Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -177.79% beat 22nd Century Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -207.64%.

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1933541.9%. On the other hand 22nd Century Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 757.14%. Given that Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than 22nd Century Group, Inc., analysts believe Greenlane Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than 22nd Century Group, Inc..

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.68% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 22nd Century Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.333%.

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 22nd Century Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 22nd Century Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $737K, which are smaller than 22nd Century Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4M. Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$8.9M is lower than 22nd Century Group, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 22nd Century Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. is 2.51x versus 0.20x for 22nd Century Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.