GIPR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a net margin of -67.99% compared to Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s net margin of -15.58%. Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of -19.99% beat Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.13%.

Generation Income Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 592.04%. On the other hand Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.58 which suggests that it could grow by 28.41%. Given that Generation Income Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Healthpeak Properties, Inc., analysts believe Generation Income Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Healthpeak Properties, Inc..

Generation Income Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.464%.

Generation Income Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 7.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Generation Income Properties, Inc. pays 27.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. pays out 334.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s is not.

Generation Income Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Healthpeak Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $705.9M. Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M is higher than Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$110M. Notably, Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 79.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Generation Income Properties, Inc. is 0.40x versus 3.99x for Healthpeak Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has a net margin of -67.99% compared to Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 62.44%. Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of -19.99% beat Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.8%.

Generation Income Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 592.04%. On the other hand Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.86 which suggests that it could grow by 20.52%. Given that Generation Income Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc., analysts believe Generation Income Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc..

Generation Income Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.82%.

Generation Income Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 6.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Generation Income Properties, Inc. pays 27.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. pays out 106.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s is not.

Generation Income Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $397.6M. Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M is lower than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s net income of $248.3M. Notably, Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Generation Income Properties, Inc. is 0.40x versus 7.88x for Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opendoor Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -67.99% compared to Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s net margin of -9.84%. Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of -19.99% beat Opendoor Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.02%.

Generation Income Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 592.04%. On the other hand Opendoor Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.99 which suggests that it could fall by -52.46%. Given that Generation Income Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Opendoor Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Generation Income Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Opendoor Technologies, Inc..

Generation Income Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opendoor Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 3.581, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 258.121%.

Generation Income Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Opendoor Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Generation Income Properties, Inc. pays 27.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Opendoor Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Generation Income Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Opendoor Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $915M. Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M is higher than Opendoor Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$90M. Notably, Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Opendoor Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Generation Income Properties, Inc. is 0.40x versus 0.97x for Opendoor Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a net margin of -67.99% compared to Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 14.79%. Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of -19.99% beat Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48%.

Generation Income Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 592.04%. On the other hand Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.58 which suggests that it could grow by 10.63%. Given that Generation Income Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc., analysts believe Generation Income Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc..

Generation Income Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Generation Income Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Generation Income Properties, Inc. pays 27.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. pays out 233.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s is not.

Generation Income Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $184.1M. Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M is lower than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net income of $27.2M. Notably, Generation Income Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Generation Income Properties, Inc. is 0.40x versus 6.91x for Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.