Is Uber Stock a Buy on the Dip?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have been fading fast in…
Sell
8
GFLW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.08
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$24.08 - $24.09
52-week range:
$23.95 - $25.57
Dividend yield:
0.01%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.1K
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TMFE
Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
$24.25 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0.01% | -- |
|
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
|
$25.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 0.49% | -- |
|
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
|
$36.09 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.48% | -- |
|
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
|
$47.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0.09% | -- |
|
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
|
$45.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.57% | -- |
|
TMFE
Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF
|
$27.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 0.43% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
|
-- | 2.149 | -- | -- |
|
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
|
-- | 1.148 | -- | -- |
|
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
|
-- | 1.402 | -- | -- |
|
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
|
-- | 1.741 | -- | -- |
|
TMFE
Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF
|
-- | 1.168 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TMFE
Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or BUZZ?
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Social Sentiment ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- BUZZVanEck Social Sentiment ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or BUZZ?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Social Sentiment ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Social Sentiment ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than VanEck Social Sentiment ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 BUZZVanEck Social Sentiment ETF0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or BUZZ More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Social Sentiment ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or BUZZ?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.01%. VanEck Social Sentiment ETF offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Social Sentiment ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or BUZZ?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Social Sentiment ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Social Sentiment ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Social Sentiment ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- BUZZVanEck Social Sentiment ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or QQMG?
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- QQMGInvesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or QQMG?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 QQMGInvesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or QQMG More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or QQMG?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.01%. Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or QQMG?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- QQMGInvesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or QQQA?
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- QQQAProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or QQQA?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 QQQAProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or QQQA More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or QQQA?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.01%. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or QQQA?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- QQQAProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or SFYF?
SoFi Social 50 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat SoFi Social 50 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- SFYFSoFi Social 50 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or SFYF?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SoFi Social 50 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than SoFi Social 50 ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than SoFi Social 50 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 SFYFSoFi Social 50 ETF0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or SFYF More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoFi Social 50 ETF has a beta of 1.533, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.299%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or SFYF?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.01%. SoFi Social 50 ETF offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoFi Social 50 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or SFYF?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SoFi Social 50 ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than SoFi Social 50 ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SoFi Social 50 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for SoFi Social 50 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- SFYFSoFi Social 50 ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or TMFE?
Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- TMFEMotley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or TMFE?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 TMFEMotley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or TMFE More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or TMFE?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.01%. Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or TMFE?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- TMFEMotley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is AMD Stock an All-Time Buy?
Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) is a high-growth AI stock that…
How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x
Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
LMND alert for Dec 28
Lemonade [LMND] is down 10.69% over the past day.
Sell
50
TSLL alert for Dec 28
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 9.92% over the past day.
Buy
63
SMLR alert for Dec 28
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 9.65% over the past day.
