Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
40
GFLW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.55
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$28.29 - $28.61
52-week range:
$18.88 - $29.60
Dividend yield:
0.03%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
81.9K
Avg. volume:
160K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
$28.44 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0.03% | -- |
|
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
|
$84.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 0.8% | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
$123.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0.4% | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
$476.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 0.35% | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
$92.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0.56% | -- |
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
$79.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.2% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
|
-- | 1.276 | -- | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.262 | -- | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
-- | 1.274 | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | 1.342 | -- | -- |
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | 1.539 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or FDMO?
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- FDMOFidelity Momentum Factor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or FDMO?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 FDMOFidelity Momentum Factor ETF0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or FDMO More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.037%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or FDMO?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or FDMO?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- FDMOFidelity Momentum Factor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or IVW?
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or IVW?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or IVW More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.373%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or IVW?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or IVW?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or IWF?
iShares Russell 1000 Growth has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Russell 1000 Growth's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or IWF?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Russell 1000 Growth has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Russell 1000 Growth, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than iShares Russell 1000 Growth.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or IWF More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Russell 1000 Growth has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.137%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or IWF?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. iShares Russell 1000 Growth offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Russell 1000 Growth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or IWF?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Russell 1000 Growth quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Russell 1000 Growth's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Russell 1000 Growth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Russell 1000 Growth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or ONEQ?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or ONEQ?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or ONEQ More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.168, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.828%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or ONEQ?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or ONEQ?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or QQH?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or QQH?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than HCM Defender 100 Index ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than HCM Defender 100 Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or QQH More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.789%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or QQH?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or QQH?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4
Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.
