Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
72
GFLW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.73
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$28.60 - $28.74
52-week range:
$18.88 - $29.60
Dividend yield:
0.03%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
26.6K
Avg. volume:
161.4K
1-year change:
16.63%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
$28.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0.03% | -- |
|
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
|
$85.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 0.6% | -- |
|
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
$163.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.2% | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
$92.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 0.53% | -- |
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
$79.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.21% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
|
-- | 1.276 | -- | -- |
|
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 1.299 | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | 1.342 | -- | -- |
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | 1.539 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or FDMO?
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- FDMOFidelity Momentum Factor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or FDMO?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 FDMOFidelity Momentum Factor ETF0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or FDMO More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.037%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or FDMO?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or FDMO?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- FDMOFidelity Momentum Factor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or FTC?
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- FTCFirst Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or FTC?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 FTCFirst Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or FTC More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 1.132, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.197%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or FTC?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or FTC?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- FTCFirst Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or ONEQ?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or ONEQ?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or ONEQ More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.168, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.828%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or ONEQ?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or ONEQ?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFLW or QQH?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net margin of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GFLW or QQH?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher upside potential than HCM Defender 100 Index ETF, analysts believe VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more attractive than HCM Defender 100 Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF0 0 0 QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is GFLW or QQH More Risky?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.789%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFLW or QQH?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.03%. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFLW or QQH?
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is -- versus -- for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFLWVictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF-- -- -- -- QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
