GEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cohen & has a net margin of 66.11% compared to Great Elm Group's net margin of 6.78%. Great Elm Group's return on equity of -2.14% beat Cohen &'s return on equity of 6.72%.

Great Elm Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cohen & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Great Elm Group has higher upside potential than Cohen &, analysts believe Great Elm Group is more attractive than Cohen &.

Great Elm Group has a beta of 0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 0.22799999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.774%.

Great Elm Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cohen & offers a yield of 9.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Great Elm Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & pays out -34.23% of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Elm Group quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than Cohen & quarterly revenues of $31.7M. Great Elm Group's net income of $2.6M is higher than Cohen &'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Great Elm Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cohen &'s PE ratio is 2.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Elm Group is 3.27x versus 0.51x for Cohen &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 66.11% compared to Great Elm Group's net margin of 82.11%. Great Elm Group's return on equity of -2.14% beat Capital Southwest's return on equity of 9.95%.

Great Elm Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capital Southwest has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.56%. Given that Capital Southwest has higher upside potential than Great Elm Group, analysts believe Capital Southwest is more attractive than Great Elm Group.

Great Elm Group has a beta of 0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 0.22799999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Southwest has a beta of 1.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.325%.

Great Elm Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capital Southwest offers a yield of 12.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Great Elm Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Southwest pays out 123.43% of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Elm Group quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than Capital Southwest quarterly revenues of $27.6M. Great Elm Group's net income of $2.6M is lower than Capital Southwest's net income of $22.7M. Notably, Great Elm Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Capital Southwest's PE ratio is 12.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Elm Group is 3.27x versus 9.10x for Capital Southwest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PhenixFIN has a net margin of 66.11% compared to Great Elm Group's net margin of 71.55%. Great Elm Group's return on equity of -2.14% beat PhenixFIN's return on equity of 12.15%.

Great Elm Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PhenixFIN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -29.58%. Given that PhenixFIN has higher upside potential than Great Elm Group, analysts believe PhenixFIN is more attractive than Great Elm Group.

Great Elm Group has a beta of 0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 0.22799999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PhenixFIN has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.497%.

Great Elm Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PhenixFIN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share. Great Elm Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PhenixFIN pays out 14.21% of its earnings as a dividend. PhenixFIN's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Elm Group quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than PhenixFIN quarterly revenues of $8.5M. Great Elm Group's net income of $2.6M is lower than PhenixFIN's net income of $6.1M. Notably, Great Elm Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PhenixFIN's PE ratio is 5.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Elm Group is 3.27x versus 3.55x for PhenixFIN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rand Capital has a net margin of 66.11% compared to Great Elm Group's net margin of 96.31%. Great Elm Group's return on equity of -2.14% beat Rand Capital's return on equity of 19.93%.

Great Elm Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rand Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Great Elm Group has higher upside potential than Rand Capital, analysts believe Great Elm Group is more attractive than Rand Capital.

Great Elm Group has a beta of 0.998, which suggesting that the stock is 0.22799999999999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rand Capital has a beta of 0.477, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.336%.

Great Elm Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rand Capital offers a yield of 9.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Great Elm Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rand Capital pays out 52.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Rand Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Elm Group quarterly revenues are $4M, which are larger than Rand Capital quarterly revenues of $2.7M. Great Elm Group's net income of $2.6M is higher than Rand Capital's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Great Elm Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rand Capital's PE ratio is 3.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Elm Group is 3.27x versus 3.12x for Rand Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.