FWRG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bloomin Brands has a net margin of 0.84% compared to First Watch Restaurant Group's net margin of 0.67%. First Watch Restaurant Group's return on equity of 3.64% beat Bloomin Brands's return on equity of -1.6%.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.52%. On the other hand Bloomin Brands has an analysts' consensus of $20.75 which suggests that it could grow by 38.72%. Given that Bloomin Brands has higher upside potential than First Watch Restaurant Group, analysts believe Bloomin Brands is more attractive than First Watch Restaurant Group.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bloomin Brands has a beta of 1.945, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.535%.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bloomin Brands offers a yield of 8.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. First Watch Restaurant Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bloomin Brands pays out 33.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Bloomin Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Watch Restaurant Group quarterly revenues are $251.6M, which are smaller than Bloomin Brands quarterly revenues of $1B. First Watch Restaurant Group's net income of $2.1M is lower than Bloomin Brands's net income of $6.9M. Notably, First Watch Restaurant Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.39x while Bloomin Brands's PE ratio is 67.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Watch Restaurant Group is 1.16x versus 0.23x for Bloomin Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Foodbase Group has a net margin of 0.84% compared to First Watch Restaurant Group's net margin of --. First Watch Restaurant Group's return on equity of 3.64% beat Foodbase Group's return on equity of --.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.52%. On the other hand Foodbase Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Watch Restaurant Group has higher upside potential than Foodbase Group, analysts believe First Watch Restaurant Group is more attractive than Foodbase Group.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foodbase Group has a beta of 0.733, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.721%.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foodbase Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Watch Restaurant Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foodbase Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Watch Restaurant Group quarterly revenues are $251.6M, which are larger than Foodbase Group quarterly revenues of --. First Watch Restaurant Group's net income of $2.1M is higher than Foodbase Group's net income of --. Notably, First Watch Restaurant Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.39x while Foodbase Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Watch Restaurant Group is 1.16x versus 0.01x for Foodbase Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Giant Group has a net margin of 0.84% compared to First Watch Restaurant Group's net margin of --. First Watch Restaurant Group's return on equity of 3.64% beat Giant Group's return on equity of --.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.52%. On the other hand Giant Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Watch Restaurant Group has higher upside potential than Giant Group, analysts believe First Watch Restaurant Group is more attractive than Giant Group.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Group has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.334%.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Watch Restaurant Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Watch Restaurant Group quarterly revenues are $251.6M, which are larger than Giant Group quarterly revenues of --. First Watch Restaurant Group's net income of $2.1M is higher than Giant Group's net income of --. Notably, First Watch Restaurant Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.39x while Giant Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Watch Restaurant Group is 1.16x versus -- for Giant Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Potbelly has a net margin of 0.84% compared to First Watch Restaurant Group's net margin of 3.24%. First Watch Restaurant Group's return on equity of 3.64% beat Potbelly's return on equity of 139.56%.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.52%. On the other hand Potbelly has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 70.18%. Given that Potbelly has higher upside potential than First Watch Restaurant Group, analysts believe Potbelly is more attractive than First Watch Restaurant Group.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Potbelly has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.934%.

First Watch Restaurant Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Potbelly offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Watch Restaurant Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Potbelly pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Watch Restaurant Group quarterly revenues are $251.6M, which are larger than Potbelly quarterly revenues of $115.1M. First Watch Restaurant Group's net income of $2.1M is lower than Potbelly's net income of $3.7M. Notably, First Watch Restaurant Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.39x while Potbelly's PE ratio is 7.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Watch Restaurant Group is 1.16x versus 0.58x for Potbelly. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.