FRGT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of -39.07% compared to Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 55.98%. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 110.69%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2678471.43%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $253.02 which suggests that it could grow by 35.67%. Given that Freight Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than NVIDIA Corp., analysts believe Freight Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than NVIDIA Corp..

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.030, which suggesting that the stock is 3.002% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.494%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Freight Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 1.16% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Freight Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $57B. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $31.9B. Notably, Freight Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 46.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freight Technologies, Inc. is 0.04x versus 24.50x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ondas Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -39.07% compared to Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -74.08%. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Ondas Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.9%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2678471.43%. On the other hand Ondas Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.83%. Given that Freight Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ondas Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Freight Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Ondas Holdings, Inc..

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.030, which suggesting that the stock is 3.002% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ondas Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.399, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.915%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ondas Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Freight Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ondas Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Freight Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Ondas Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.1M. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M is higher than Ondas Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$7.5M. Notably, Freight Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ondas Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freight Technologies, Inc. is 0.04x versus 58.73x for Ondas Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing, Inc. has a net margin of -39.07% compared to Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -10321.93%. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Rigetti Computing, Inc.'s return on equity of -127.01%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2678471.43%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $38.24 which suggests that it could grow by 72.62%. Given that Freight Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rigetti Computing, Inc., analysts believe Freight Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Rigetti Computing, Inc..

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.030, which suggesting that the stock is 3.002% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Freight Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Freight Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are larger than Rigetti Computing, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M is higher than Rigetti Computing, Inc.'s net income of -$201M. Notably, Freight Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freight Technologies, Inc. is 0.04x versus 850.68x for Rigetti Computing, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryvyl, Inc. has a net margin of -39.07% compared to Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -70.1%. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Ryvyl, Inc.'s return on equity of -2705.75%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2678471.43%. On the other hand Ryvyl, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1596.48%. Given that Freight Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ryvyl, Inc., analysts believe Freight Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Ryvyl, Inc..

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.030, which suggesting that the stock is 3.002% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryvyl, Inc. has a beta of 2.870, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 186.951%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryvyl, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Freight Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryvyl, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Freight Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Ryvyl, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8M. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than Ryvyl, Inc.'s net income of -$2M. Notably, Freight Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ryvyl, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freight Technologies, Inc. is 0.04x versus 0.06x for Ryvyl, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.