FRGT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of -- compared to Freight Technologies's net margin of 24.04%. Freight Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

Freight Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179900%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.08 which suggests that it could grow by 0.44%. Given that Freight Technologies has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Freight Technologies is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Freight Technologies has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.48%.

Freight Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Freight Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Freight Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Freight Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Freight Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 31.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freight Technologies is 0.01x versus 6.61x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of -- compared to Freight Technologies's net margin of 18.49%. Freight Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Freight Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179900%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $320.15 which suggests that it could grow by 11.36%. Given that Freight Technologies has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Freight Technologies is more attractive than Autodesk.

Freight Technologies has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.828%.

Freight Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Freight Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Freight Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Freight Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Freight Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 56.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freight Technologies is 0.01x versus 10.18x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -- compared to Freight Technologies's net margin of 0.54%. Freight Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

Freight Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179900%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.44 which suggests that it could grow by 252.33%. Given that Freight Technologies has higher upside potential than Inuvo, analysts believe Freight Technologies is more attractive than Inuvo.

Freight Technologies has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.643%.

Freight Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Freight Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Freight Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Freight Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, Freight Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freight Technologies is 0.01x versus 0.68x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of -- compared to Freight Technologies's net margin of 3.37%. Freight Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Okta's return on equity of 0.46%.

Freight Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 179900%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $118.25 which suggests that it could fall by -1.01%. Given that Freight Technologies has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Freight Technologies is more attractive than Okta.

Freight Technologies has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.114%.

Freight Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Freight Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Freight Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Okta quarterly revenues of $682M. Freight Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Okta's net income of $23M. Notably, Freight Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Okta's PE ratio is 2,986.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freight Technologies is 0.01x versus 8.05x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.