FRGT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CACI International, Inc. has a net margin of -39.07% compared to Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 5.58%. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat CACI International, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.3%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3813459.32%. On the other hand CACI International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $722.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.29%. Given that Freight Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than CACI International, Inc., analysts believe Freight Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than CACI International, Inc..

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CACI International, Inc. has a beta of 0.578, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.217%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CACI International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Freight Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CACI International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Freight Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than CACI International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than CACI International, Inc.'s net income of $123.9M. Notably, Freight Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CACI International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freight Technologies, Inc. is 0.01x versus 1.45x for CACI International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CSP, Inc. has a net margin of -39.07% compared to Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 0.72%. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat CSP, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.03%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3813459.32%. On the other hand CSP, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Freight Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than CSP, Inc., analysts believe Freight Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than CSP, Inc..

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CSP, Inc. has a beta of 0.732, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.78%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CSP, Inc. offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Freight Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CSP, Inc. pays out 312.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Freight Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than CSP, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12M. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than CSP, Inc.'s net income of $86K. Notably, Freight Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CSP, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1,433.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freight Technologies, Inc. is 0.01x versus 1.56x for CSP, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has a net margin of -39.07% compared to Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 12.15%. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of 14.97%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3813459.32%. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $90.20 which suggests that it could grow by 38.7%. Given that Freight Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., analysts believe Freight Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp..

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.946%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Freight Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. pays out 27.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Freight Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s net income of $648M. Notably, Freight Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freight Technologies, Inc. is 0.01x versus 1.51x for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DXC Technology Co. has a net margin of -39.07% compared to Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 3.44%. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat DXC Technology Co.'s return on equity of 12.74%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3813459.32%. On the other hand DXC Technology Co. has an analysts' consensus of $14.75 which suggests that it could grow by 10.49%. Given that Freight Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than DXC Technology Co., analysts believe Freight Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than DXC Technology Co..

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXC Technology Co. has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.698%.

Freight Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DXC Technology Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Freight Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DXC Technology Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Freight Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than DXC Technology Co. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Freight Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than DXC Technology Co.'s net income of $110M. Notably, Freight Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DXC Technology Co.'s PE ratio is 5.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freight Technologies, Inc. is 0.01x versus 0.19x for DXC Technology Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.