FNGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MoneyHero has a net margin of -19.46% compared to FingerMotion's net margin of 27.32%. FingerMotion's return on equity of -49.19% beat MoneyHero's return on equity of -273.52%.

FingerMotion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 206.75%. On the other hand MoneyHero has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FingerMotion has higher upside potential than MoneyHero, analysts believe FingerMotion is more attractive than MoneyHero.

FingerMotion has a beta of 0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 72.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MoneyHero has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FingerMotion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MoneyHero offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FingerMotion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MoneyHero pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FingerMotion quarterly revenues are $8.5M, which are smaller than MoneyHero quarterly revenues of $20.9M. FingerMotion's net income of -$1.7M is lower than MoneyHero's net income of $5.7M. Notably, FingerMotion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MoneyHero's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FingerMotion is 2.56x versus 0.36x for MoneyHero. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mega Matrix has a net margin of -19.46% compared to FingerMotion's net margin of -26.8%. FingerMotion's return on equity of -49.19% beat Mega Matrix's return on equity of -52.45%.

FingerMotion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 206.75%. On the other hand Mega Matrix has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 191.92%. Given that FingerMotion has higher upside potential than Mega Matrix, analysts believe FingerMotion is more attractive than Mega Matrix.

FingerMotion has a beta of 0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 72.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mega Matrix has a beta of 3.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 204.113%.

FingerMotion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mega Matrix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FingerMotion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mega Matrix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FingerMotion quarterly revenues are $8.5M, which are smaller than Mega Matrix quarterly revenues of $10.3M. FingerMotion's net income of -$1.7M is higher than Mega Matrix's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, FingerMotion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mega Matrix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FingerMotion is 2.56x versus 0.92x for Mega Matrix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sound Group has a net margin of -19.46% compared to FingerMotion's net margin of --. FingerMotion's return on equity of -49.19% beat Sound Group's return on equity of -13.16%.

FingerMotion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 206.75%. On the other hand Sound Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 536.14%. Given that Sound Group has higher upside potential than FingerMotion, analysts believe Sound Group is more attractive than FingerMotion.

FingerMotion has a beta of 0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 72.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sound Group has a beta of 1.617, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.704%.

FingerMotion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sound Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FingerMotion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sound Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FingerMotion quarterly revenues are $8.5M, which are larger than Sound Group quarterly revenues of --. FingerMotion's net income of -$1.7M is higher than Sound Group's net income of --. Notably, FingerMotion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sound Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FingerMotion is 2.56x versus 0.06x for Sound Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JOYY has a net margin of -19.46% compared to FingerMotion's net margin of -55.36%. FingerMotion's return on equity of -49.19% beat JOYY's return on equity of -2.82%.

FingerMotion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 206.75%. On the other hand JOYY has an analysts' consensus of $53.10 which suggests that it could grow by 27.82%. Given that FingerMotion has higher upside potential than JOYY, analysts believe FingerMotion is more attractive than JOYY.

FingerMotion has a beta of 0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 72.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JOYY has a beta of 0.212, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.794%.

FingerMotion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JOYY offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. FingerMotion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JOYY pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FingerMotion quarterly revenues are $8.5M, which are smaller than JOYY quarterly revenues of $549.4M. FingerMotion's net income of -$1.7M is higher than JOYY's net income of -$304.1M. Notably, FingerMotion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JOYY's PE ratio is 2.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FingerMotion is 2.56x versus 0.90x for JOYY. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.