FLEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Inuvo has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Flex's net margin of -9.14%. Flex's return on equity of 16.8% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Flex has a consensus price target of $42.89, signalling upside risk potential of 7.06%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.87%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Flex, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Flex.

Flex has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flex quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Flex's net income of $214M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.73x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex is 0.68x versus 1.27x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jabil has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Flex's net margin of 1.43%. Flex's return on equity of 16.8% beat Jabil's return on equity of 59.91%.

Flex has a consensus price target of $42.89, signalling upside risk potential of 7.06%. On the other hand Jabil has an analysts' consensus of $165.14 which suggests that it could grow by 10.34%. Given that Jabil has higher upside potential than Flex, analysts believe Jabil is more attractive than Flex.

Flex has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.148%.

Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Flex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil pays out 3.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are smaller than Jabil quarterly revenues of $7B. Flex's net income of $214M is higher than Jabil's net income of $100M. Notably, Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.73x while Jabil's PE ratio is 14.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex is 0.68x versus 0.65x for Jabil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Flex's net margin of -105.32%. Flex's return on equity of 16.8% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

Flex has a consensus price target of $42.89, signalling upside risk potential of 7.06%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 468.18%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Flex, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Flex.

Flex has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 330.016%.

Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flex quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Flex's net income of $214M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.73x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex is 0.68x versus 0.05x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Flex's net margin of -1.23%. Flex's return on equity of 16.8% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Flex has a consensus price target of $42.89, signalling upside risk potential of 7.06%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 38%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Flex, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Flex.

Flex has a beta of 1.099, which suggesting that the stock is 9.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.556%.

Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flex quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Flex's net income of $214M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.73x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex is 0.68x versus 0.32x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.