FLEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cognex Corp. has a net margin of 2.93% compared to Flex Ltd.'s net margin of 6.38%. Flex Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.44% beat Cognex Corp.'s return on equity of 7.32%.

Flex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $74.51, signalling upside risk potential of 17.25%. On the other hand Cognex Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $48.65 which suggests that it could grow by 32.92%. Given that Cognex Corp. has higher upside potential than Flex Ltd., analysts believe Cognex Corp. is more attractive than Flex Ltd..

Flex Ltd. has a beta of 1.257, which suggesting that the stock is 25.706% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognex Corp. has a beta of 1.530, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.973%.

Flex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognex Corp. offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Flex Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognex Corp. pays out 49.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognex Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Cognex Corp. quarterly revenues of $276.9M. Flex Ltd.'s net income of $199M is higher than Cognex Corp.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, Flex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Cognex Corp.'s PE ratio is 56.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex Ltd. is 0.93x versus 6.41x for Cognex Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jabil, Inc. has a net margin of 2.93% compared to Flex Ltd.'s net margin of 1.76%. Flex Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.44% beat Jabil, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.49%.

Flex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $74.51, signalling upside risk potential of 17.25%. On the other hand Jabil, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $259.25 which suggests that it could grow by 10.29%. Given that Flex Ltd. has higher upside potential than Jabil, Inc., analysts believe Flex Ltd. is more attractive than Jabil, Inc..

Flex Ltd. has a beta of 1.257, which suggesting that the stock is 25.706% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil, Inc. has a beta of 1.263, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.317%.

Flex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil, Inc. offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Flex Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil, Inc. pays out 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than Jabil, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Flex Ltd.'s net income of $199M is higher than Jabil, Inc.'s net income of $146M. Notably, Flex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Jabil, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex Ltd. is 0.93x versus 0.83x for Jabil, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS, Inc. has a net margin of 2.93% compared to Flex Ltd.'s net margin of 7.49%. Flex Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.44% beat MKS, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.37%.

Flex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $74.51, signalling upside risk potential of 17.25%. On the other hand MKS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $180.92 which suggests that it could grow by 11.05%. Given that Flex Ltd. has higher upside potential than MKS, Inc., analysts believe Flex Ltd. is more attractive than MKS, Inc..

Flex Ltd. has a beta of 1.257, which suggesting that the stock is 25.706% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS, Inc. has a beta of 1.933, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.314%.

Flex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MKS, Inc. offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Flex Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MKS, Inc. pays out 31.31% of its earnings as a dividend. MKS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than MKS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $988M. Flex Ltd.'s net income of $199M is higher than MKS, Inc.'s net income of $74M. Notably, Flex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while MKS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex Ltd. is 0.93x versus 2.87x for MKS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TTM Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 2.93% compared to Flex Ltd.'s net margin of 7.05%. Flex Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.44% beat TTM Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.21%.

Flex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $74.51, signalling upside risk potential of 17.25%. On the other hand TTM Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $80.75 which suggests that it could grow by 12.8%. Given that Flex Ltd. has higher upside potential than TTM Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Flex Ltd. is more attractive than TTM Technologies, Inc..

Flex Ltd. has a beta of 1.257, which suggesting that the stock is 25.706% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TTM Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.736, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.615%.

Flex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TTM Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flex Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TTM Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than TTM Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $752.7M. Flex Ltd.'s net income of $199M is higher than TTM Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $53.1M. Notably, Flex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while TTM Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 57.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex Ltd. is 0.93x versus 2.70x for TTM Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.