FLEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cognex Corp. has a net margin of 3.39% compared to Flex Ltd.'s net margin of 12.95%. Flex Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.88% beat Cognex Corp.'s return on equity of 7.68%.

Flex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $76.13, signalling upside risk potential of 20.8%. On the other hand Cognex Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $65.35 which suggests that it could grow by 20.13%. Given that Flex Ltd. has higher upside potential than Cognex Corp., analysts believe Flex Ltd. is more attractive than Cognex Corp..

Flex Ltd. has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.193% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognex Corp. has a beta of 1.533, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.304%.

Flex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognex Corp. offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Flex Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognex Corp. pays out 48.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognex Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than Cognex Corp. quarterly revenues of $252.3M. Flex Ltd.'s net income of $239M is higher than Cognex Corp.'s net income of $32.7M. Notably, Flex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.21x while Cognex Corp.'s PE ratio is 80.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex Ltd. is 0.90x versus 9.26x for Cognex Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jabil, Inc. has a net margin of 3.39% compared to Flex Ltd.'s net margin of 1.76%. Flex Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.88% beat Jabil, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.49%.

Flex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $76.13, signalling upside risk potential of 20.8%. On the other hand Jabil, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $264.50 which suggests that it could fall by -0.19%. Given that Flex Ltd. has higher upside potential than Jabil, Inc., analysts believe Flex Ltd. is more attractive than Jabil, Inc..

Flex Ltd. has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.193% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil, Inc. has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.903%.

Flex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil, Inc. offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Flex Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil, Inc. pays out 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are smaller than Jabil, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Flex Ltd.'s net income of $239M is higher than Jabil, Inc.'s net income of $146M. Notably, Flex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.21x while Jabil, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex Ltd. is 0.90x versus 0.93x for Jabil, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of 3.39% compared to Flex Ltd.'s net margin of 63.06%. Flex Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.88% beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 111.28%.

Flex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $76.13, signalling upside risk potential of 20.8%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $259.53 which suggests that it could grow by 40.57%. Given that NVIDIA Corp. has higher upside potential than Flex Ltd., analysts believe NVIDIA Corp. is more attractive than Flex Ltd..

Flex Ltd. has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.193% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.313, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.251%.

Flex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Flex Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 0.82% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $68.1B. Flex Ltd.'s net income of $239M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $43B. Notably, Flex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.21x while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 37.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex Ltd. is 0.90x versus 20.99x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teradyne, Inc. has a net margin of 3.39% compared to Flex Ltd.'s net margin of 23.77%. Flex Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.88% beat Teradyne, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.83%.

Flex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $76.13, signalling upside risk potential of 20.8%. On the other hand Teradyne, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $302.71 which suggests that it could fall by -9.02%. Given that Flex Ltd. has higher upside potential than Teradyne, Inc., analysts believe Flex Ltd. is more attractive than Teradyne, Inc..

Flex Ltd. has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.193% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teradyne, Inc. has a beta of 1.834, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.397%.

Flex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teradyne, Inc. offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Flex Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne, Inc. pays out 13.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $7.1B, which are larger than Teradyne, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Flex Ltd.'s net income of $239M is lower than Teradyne, Inc.'s net income of $257.2M. Notably, Flex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.21x while Teradyne, Inc.'s PE ratio is 95.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex Ltd. is 0.90x versus 16.66x for Teradyne, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.