FLEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CTS has a net margin of 4.01% compared to Flex's net margin of 10.68%. Flex's return on equity of 18.89% beat CTS's return on equity of 11.04%.

Flex has a consensus price target of $45.65, signalling upside risk potential of 45.53%. On the other hand CTS has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.16%. Given that Flex has higher upside potential than CTS, analysts believe Flex is more attractive than CTS.

Flex has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CTS has a beta of 0.612, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.794%.

Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CTS offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Flex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CTS pays out 8.41% of its earnings as a dividend. CTS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than CTS quarterly revenues of $127.4M. Flex's net income of $263M is higher than CTS's net income of $13.6M. Notably, Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.65x while CTS's PE ratio is 19.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex is 0.50x versus 2.22x for CTS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Corning has a net margin of 4.01% compared to Flex's net margin of 8.86%. Flex's return on equity of 18.89% beat Corning's return on equity of 4.45%.

Flex has a consensus price target of $45.65, signalling upside risk potential of 45.53%. On the other hand Corning has an analysts' consensus of $54.30 which suggests that it could grow by 29.97%. Given that Flex has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe Flex is more attractive than Corning.

Flex has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Corning has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.054%.

Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Corning offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Flex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corning pays out 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend.

Flex quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Corning quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Flex's net income of $263M is lower than Corning's net income of $310M. Notably, Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.65x while Corning's PE ratio is 72.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex is 0.50x versus 2.75x for Corning. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Knowles has a net margin of 4.01% compared to Flex's net margin of 12.98%. Flex's return on equity of 18.89% beat Knowles's return on equity of -27.31%.

Flex has a consensus price target of $45.65, signalling upside risk potential of 45.53%. On the other hand Knowles has an analysts' consensus of $19.75 which suggests that it could grow by 36.3%. Given that Flex has higher upside potential than Knowles, analysts believe Flex is more attractive than Knowles.

Flex has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Knowles has a beta of 1.407, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.673%.

Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Knowles offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Knowles pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flex quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Knowles quarterly revenues of $142.5M. Flex's net income of $263M is higher than Knowles's net income of $18.5M. Notably, Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.65x while Knowles's PE ratio is 17.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex is 0.50x versus 1.90x for Knowles. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TTM Technologies has a net margin of 4.01% compared to Flex's net margin of 0.79%. Flex's return on equity of 18.89% beat TTM Technologies's return on equity of 3.67%.

Flex has a consensus price target of $45.65, signalling upside risk potential of 45.53%. On the other hand TTM Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $34.75 which suggests that it could grow by 84.64%. Given that TTM Technologies has higher upside potential than Flex, analysts believe TTM Technologies is more attractive than Flex.

Flex has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TTM Technologies has a beta of 1.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.325%.

Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TTM Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TTM Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flex quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than TTM Technologies quarterly revenues of $651M. Flex's net income of $263M is higher than TTM Technologies's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.65x while TTM Technologies's PE ratio is 34.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex is 0.50x versus 0.80x for TTM Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.