FLEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cognex Corp. has a net margin of 2.93% compared to Flex Ltd.'s net margin of 6.38%. Flex Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.44% beat Cognex Corp.'s return on equity of 7.32%.

Flex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $73.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.94%. On the other hand Cognex Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $48.05 which suggests that it could grow by 20.85%. Given that Cognex Corp. has higher upside potential than Flex Ltd., analysts believe Cognex Corp. is more attractive than Flex Ltd..

Flex Ltd. has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.193% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognex Corp. has a beta of 1.533, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.304%.

Flex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognex Corp. offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Flex Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognex Corp. pays out 49.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognex Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Cognex Corp. quarterly revenues of $276.9M. Flex Ltd.'s net income of $199M is higher than Cognex Corp.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, Flex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.55x while Cognex Corp.'s PE ratio is 61.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex Ltd. is 0.95x versus 6.96x for Cognex Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jabil, Inc. has a net margin of 2.93% compared to Flex Ltd.'s net margin of 1.76%. Flex Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.44% beat Jabil, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.49%.

Flex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $73.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.94%. On the other hand Jabil, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $264.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.75%. Given that Flex Ltd. has higher upside potential than Jabil, Inc., analysts believe Flex Ltd. is more attractive than Jabil, Inc..

Flex Ltd. has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.193% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil, Inc. has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.903%.

Flex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil, Inc. offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Flex Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil, Inc. pays out 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than Jabil, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Flex Ltd.'s net income of $199M is higher than Jabil, Inc.'s net income of $146M. Notably, Flex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.55x while Jabil, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex Ltd. is 0.95x versus 0.86x for Jabil, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS, Inc. has a net margin of 2.93% compared to Flex Ltd.'s net margin of 7.49%. Flex Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.44% beat MKS, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.37%.

Flex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $73.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.94%. On the other hand MKS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $232.15 which suggests that it could fall by -0.61%. Given that Flex Ltd. has higher upside potential than MKS, Inc., analysts believe Flex Ltd. is more attractive than MKS, Inc..

Flex Ltd. has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.193% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS, Inc. has a beta of 1.947, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.716%.

Flex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MKS, Inc. offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Flex Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MKS, Inc. pays out 31.31% of its earnings as a dividend. MKS, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than MKS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $988M. Flex Ltd.'s net income of $199M is higher than MKS, Inc.'s net income of $74M. Notably, Flex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.55x while MKS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 56.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex Ltd. is 0.95x versus 4.12x for MKS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sanmina Corp. has a net margin of 2.93% compared to Flex Ltd.'s net margin of 1.62%. Flex Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.44% beat Sanmina Corp.'s return on equity of 9.89%.

Flex Ltd. has a consensus price target of $73.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.94%. On the other hand Sanmina Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $197.50 which suggests that it could grow by 31.26%. Given that Sanmina Corp. has higher upside potential than Flex Ltd., analysts believe Sanmina Corp. is more attractive than Flex Ltd..

Flex Ltd. has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.193% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sanmina Corp. has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.872%.

Flex Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sanmina Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flex Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sanmina Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flex Ltd. quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Sanmina Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Flex Ltd.'s net income of $199M is higher than Sanmina Corp.'s net income of $51.8M. Notably, Flex Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.55x while Sanmina Corp.'s PE ratio is 36.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flex Ltd. is 0.95x versus 0.89x for Sanmina Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.