FIP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Compass Diversified Holdings has a net margin of -74.38% compared to FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 2.17%. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.05% beat Compass Diversified Holdings's return on equity of 0.85%.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.33, signalling upside risk potential of 81.16%. On the other hand Compass Diversified Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 67.46%. Given that FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Compass Diversified Holdings, analysts believe FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Compass Diversified Holdings.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compass Diversified Holdings has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.444%.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Compass Diversified Holdings offers a yield of 11.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. pays 10.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Compass Diversified Holdings pays out 367.57% of its earnings as a dividend. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Compass Diversified Holdings's is not.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $140.6M, which are smaller than Compass Diversified Holdings quarterly revenues of $548.7M. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of -$104.5M is lower than Compass Diversified Holdings's net income of $11.9M. Notably, FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Compass Diversified Holdings's PE ratio is 39.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. is 1.71x versus 0.41x for Compass Diversified Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deluxe Corp. has a net margin of -74.38% compared to FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 2.24%. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.05% beat Deluxe Corp.'s return on equity of 12.74%.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.33, signalling upside risk potential of 81.16%. On the other hand Deluxe Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $32.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14.74%. Given that FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Deluxe Corp., analysts believe FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Deluxe Corp..

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deluxe Corp. has a beta of 1.407, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.714%.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Deluxe Corp. offers a yield of 4.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. pays 10.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Deluxe Corp. pays out 66.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $140.6M, which are smaller than Deluxe Corp. quarterly revenues of $535.3M. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of -$104.5M is lower than Deluxe Corp.'s net income of $12M. Notably, FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Deluxe Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. is 1.71x versus 0.61x for Deluxe Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a net margin of -74.38% compared to FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of -5.78%. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.05% beat Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63%.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.33, signalling upside risk potential of 81.16%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 514.04%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than FTAI Infrastructure, Inc., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than FTAI Infrastructure, Inc..

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.173, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.319%.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Harte-Hanks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. pays 10.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $140.6M, which are larger than Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.5M. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of -$104.5M is lower than Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. is 1.71x versus 0.13x for Harte-Hanks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -74.38% compared to FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of -17648.49%. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.05% beat Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -100.92%.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.33, signalling upside risk potential of 81.16%. On the other hand Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.08 which suggests that it could grow by 54.55%. Given that FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc., analysts believe FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc..

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.96%.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. pays 10.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $140.6M, which are larger than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $365K. FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of -$104.5M is lower than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$64.4M. Notably, FTAI Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTAI Infrastructure, Inc. is 1.71x versus 67.78x for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.