FFBC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 26.06% compared to First Financial Bancorp's net margin of 16.32%. First Financial Bancorp's return on equity of 9.63% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

First Financial Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.29%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.57%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than First Financial Bancorp, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than First Financial Bancorp.

First Financial Bancorp has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

First Financial Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. First Financial Bancorp pays 34.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Financial Bancorp quarterly revenues are $201.3M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. First Financial Bancorp's net income of $52.5M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, First Financial Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.78x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Financial Bancorp is 3.21x versus 2.91x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heritage Commerce has a net margin of 26.06% compared to First Financial Bancorp's net margin of 25.41%. First Financial Bancorp's return on equity of 9.63% beat Heritage Commerce's return on equity of 6.4%.

First Financial Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.29%. On the other hand Heritage Commerce has an analysts' consensus of $11.75 which suggests that it could grow by 22.52%. Given that Heritage Commerce has higher upside potential than First Financial Bancorp, analysts believe Heritage Commerce is more attractive than First Financial Bancorp.

First Financial Bancorp has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heritage Commerce has a beta of 0.945, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.464%.

First Financial Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Heritage Commerce offers a yield of 5.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. First Financial Bancorp pays 34.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Heritage Commerce pays out 49.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Financial Bancorp quarterly revenues are $201.3M, which are larger than Heritage Commerce quarterly revenues of $41.3M. First Financial Bancorp's net income of $52.5M is higher than Heritage Commerce's net income of $10.5M. Notably, First Financial Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.78x while Heritage Commerce's PE ratio is 13.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Financial Bancorp is 3.21x versus 3.48x for Heritage Commerce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norwood Financial has a net margin of 26.06% compared to First Financial Bancorp's net margin of 21.09%. First Financial Bancorp's return on equity of 9.63% beat Norwood Financial's return on equity of 7.1%.

First Financial Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.29%. On the other hand Norwood Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Financial Bancorp has higher upside potential than Norwood Financial, analysts believe First Financial Bancorp is more attractive than Norwood Financial.

First Financial Bancorp has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwood Financial has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.363%.

First Financial Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Norwood Financial offers a yield of 4.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. First Financial Bancorp pays 34.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Norwood Financial pays out 56.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Financial Bancorp quarterly revenues are $201.3M, which are larger than Norwood Financial quarterly revenues of $18.2M. First Financial Bancorp's net income of $52.5M is higher than Norwood Financial's net income of $3.8M. Notably, First Financial Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.78x while Norwood Financial's PE ratio is 17.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Financial Bancorp is 3.21x versus 3.23x for Norwood Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 26.06% compared to First Financial Bancorp's net margin of 27.77%. First Financial Bancorp's return on equity of 9.63% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

First Financial Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.29%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.28%. Given that First Financial Bancorp has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe First Financial Bancorp is more attractive than Park National.

First Financial Bancorp has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

First Financial Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Park National offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. First Financial Bancorp pays 34.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Financial Bancorp quarterly revenues are $201.3M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. First Financial Bancorp's net income of $52.5M is higher than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, First Financial Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.78x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Financial Bancorp is 3.21x versus 5.67x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.