FCUV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keysight Technologies has a net margin of -1472.68% compared to Focus Universal's net margin of 13.02%. Focus Universal's return on equity of -101.87% beat Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 12.1%.

Focus Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Keysight Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $184.86 which suggests that it could grow by 18.9%. Given that Keysight Technologies has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Keysight Technologies is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Focus Universal has a beta of 0.268, which suggesting that the stock is 73.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.732%.

Focus Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keysight Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Focus Universal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Focus Universal quarterly revenues are $133.2K, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Focus Universal's net income of -$2M is lower than Keysight Technologies's net income of $169M. Notably, Focus Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Keysight Technologies's PE ratio is 44.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Focus Universal is 71.00x versus 5.41x for Keysight Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mesa Laboratories has a net margin of -1472.68% compared to Focus Universal's net margin of -2.67%. Focus Universal's return on equity of -101.87% beat Mesa Laboratories's return on equity of -122.79%.

Focus Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mesa Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $150.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.73%. Given that Mesa Laboratories has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Mesa Laboratories is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Focus Universal has a beta of 0.268, which suggesting that the stock is 73.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mesa Laboratories has a beta of 0.818, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.174%.

Focus Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mesa Laboratories offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Focus Universal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mesa Laboratories pays out -1.36% of its earnings as a dividend.

Focus Universal quarterly revenues are $133.2K, which are smaller than Mesa Laboratories quarterly revenues of $62.8M. Focus Universal's net income of -$2M is lower than Mesa Laboratories's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Focus Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mesa Laboratories's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Focus Universal is 71.00x versus 2.84x for Mesa Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qorvo has a net margin of -1472.68% compared to Focus Universal's net margin of 4.5%. Focus Universal's return on equity of -101.87% beat Qorvo's return on equity of 0.77%.

Focus Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Qorvo has an analysts' consensus of $91.12 which suggests that it could grow by 26.24%. Given that Qorvo has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Qorvo is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Focus Universal has a beta of 0.268, which suggesting that the stock is 73.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qorvo has a beta of 1.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.557%.

Focus Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qorvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Focus Universal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qorvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Focus Universal quarterly revenues are $133.2K, which are smaller than Qorvo quarterly revenues of $916.3M. Focus Universal's net income of -$2M is lower than Qorvo's net income of $41.3M. Notably, Focus Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Qorvo's PE ratio is 255.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Focus Universal is 71.00x versus 1.82x for Qorvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sono-Tek has a net margin of -1472.68% compared to Focus Universal's net margin of 5.28%. Focus Universal's return on equity of -101.87% beat Sono-Tek's return on equity of 6.6%.

Focus Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sono-Tek has an analysts' consensus of $8.25 which suggests that it could grow by 129.17%. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Focus Universal has a beta of 0.268, which suggesting that the stock is 73.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.856%.

Focus Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sono-Tek offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Focus Universal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sono-Tek pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Focus Universal quarterly revenues are $133.2K, which are smaller than Sono-Tek quarterly revenues of $5.2M. Focus Universal's net income of -$2M is lower than Sono-Tek's net income of $274.2K. Notably, Focus Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sono-Tek's PE ratio is 51.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Focus Universal is 71.00x versus 2.82x for Sono-Tek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.