FCUV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keysight Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -4064.11% compared to Focus Universal, Inc.'s net margin of 17.76%. Focus Universal, Inc.'s return on equity of -254.53% beat Keysight Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.9%.

Focus Universal, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Keysight Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $219.77 which suggests that it could grow by 6.02%. Given that Keysight Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, Inc., analysts believe Keysight Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Focus Universal, Inc..

Focus Universal, Inc. has a beta of 0.328, which suggesting that the stock is 67.17% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.178, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.764%.

Focus Universal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keysight Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Focus Universal, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Focus Universal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.7K, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Focus Universal, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M is lower than Keysight Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $252M. Notably, Focus Universal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Keysight Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 42.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Focus Universal, Inc. is 17.12x versus 6.68x for Keysight Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mesa Laboratories, Inc. has a net margin of -4064.11% compared to Focus Universal, Inc.'s net margin of 4.08%. Focus Universal, Inc.'s return on equity of -254.53% beat Mesa Laboratories, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.95%.

Focus Universal, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mesa Laboratories, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $99.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.94%. Given that Mesa Laboratories, Inc. has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, Inc., analysts believe Mesa Laboratories, Inc. is more attractive than Focus Universal, Inc..

Focus Universal, Inc. has a beta of 0.328, which suggesting that the stock is 67.17% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mesa Laboratories, Inc. has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.974%.

Focus Universal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mesa Laboratories, Inc. offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Focus Universal, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mesa Laboratories, Inc. pays out 175.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Focus Universal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.7K, which are smaller than Mesa Laboratories, Inc. quarterly revenues of $60.7M. Focus Universal, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M is lower than Mesa Laboratories, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M. Notably, Focus Universal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mesa Laboratories, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Focus Universal, Inc. is 17.12x versus 1.82x for Mesa Laboratories, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qorvo, Inc. has a net margin of -4064.11% compared to Focus Universal, Inc.'s net margin of 11.3%. Focus Universal, Inc.'s return on equity of -254.53% beat Qorvo, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.36%.

Focus Universal, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Qorvo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $100.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.43%. Given that Qorvo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, Inc., analysts believe Qorvo, Inc. is more attractive than Focus Universal, Inc..

Focus Universal, Inc. has a beta of 0.328, which suggesting that the stock is 67.17% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qorvo, Inc. has a beta of 1.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.778%.

Focus Universal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qorvo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Focus Universal, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qorvo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Focus Universal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.7K, which are smaller than Qorvo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Focus Universal, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M is lower than Qorvo, Inc.'s net income of $119.6M. Notably, Focus Universal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Qorvo, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Focus Universal, Inc. is 17.12x versus 2.10x for Qorvo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sono-Tek Corp. has a net margin of -4064.11% compared to Focus Universal, Inc.'s net margin of 8.21%. Focus Universal, Inc.'s return on equity of -254.53% beat Sono-Tek Corp.'s return on equity of 8.47%.

Focus Universal, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sono-Tek Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $7.75 which suggests that it could grow by 81.08%. Given that Sono-Tek Corp. has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, Inc., analysts believe Sono-Tek Corp. is more attractive than Focus Universal, Inc..

Focus Universal, Inc. has a beta of 0.328, which suggesting that the stock is 67.17% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sono-Tek Corp. has a beta of -0.304, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.401%.

Focus Universal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sono-Tek Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Focus Universal, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sono-Tek Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Focus Universal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.7K, which are smaller than Sono-Tek Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.2M. Focus Universal, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M is lower than Sono-Tek Corp.'s net income of $423.7K. Notably, Focus Universal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sono-Tek Corp.'s PE ratio is 44.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Focus Universal, Inc. is 17.12x versus 3.27x for Sono-Tek Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.