FAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of -42.47% compared to FAT Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 3.15%. FAT Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.38%.

FAT Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1931.49%. On the other hand Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FAT Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc., analysts believe FAT Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc..

FAT Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.546, which suggesting that the stock is 54.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 0.291, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.945%.

FAT Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. FAT Brands, Inc. pays 9.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. pays out 20.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FAT Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $140M, which are larger than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of $49.2M. FAT Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$59.5M is lower than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, FAT Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FAT Brands, Inc. is 0.01x versus 0.26x for Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BJ's Restaurants, Inc. has a net margin of -42.47% compared to FAT Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 0.14%. FAT Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat BJ's Restaurants, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.3%.

FAT Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1931.49%. On the other hand BJ's Restaurants, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $38.88 which suggests that it could fall by -5.28%. Given that FAT Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than BJ's Restaurants, Inc., analysts believe FAT Brands, Inc. is more attractive than BJ's Restaurants, Inc..

FAT Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.546, which suggesting that the stock is 54.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BJ's Restaurants, Inc. has a beta of 1.312, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.158%.

FAT Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BJ's Restaurants, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FAT Brands, Inc. pays 9.13% of its earnings as a dividend. BJ's Restaurants, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FAT Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FAT Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $140M, which are smaller than BJ's Restaurants, Inc. quarterly revenues of $330.2M. FAT Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$59.5M is lower than BJ's Restaurants, Inc.'s net income of $465K. Notably, FAT Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BJ's Restaurants, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FAT Brands, Inc. is 0.01x versus 0.68x for BJ's Restaurants, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a net margin of -42.47% compared to FAT Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -6.95%. FAT Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

FAT Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1931.49%. On the other hand Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.25 which suggests that it could grow by 164.09%. Given that FAT Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., analysts believe FAT Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc..

FAT Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.546, which suggesting that the stock is 54.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a beta of 2.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.763%.

FAT Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FAT Brands, Inc. pays 9.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FAT Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FAT Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $140M, which are smaller than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. quarterly revenues of $265.1M. FAT Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$59.5M is lower than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s net income of -$18.4M. Notably, FAT Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FAT Brands, Inc. is 0.01x versus 0.06x for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Notes Live Holding has a net margin of -42.47% compared to FAT Brands, Inc.'s net margin of --. FAT Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Notes Live Holding's return on equity of --.

FAT Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1931.49%. On the other hand Notes Live Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FAT Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Notes Live Holding, analysts believe FAT Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Notes Live Holding.

FAT Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.546, which suggesting that the stock is 54.613% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Notes Live Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FAT Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Notes Live Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FAT Brands, Inc. pays 9.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Notes Live Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FAT Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FAT Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $140M, which are larger than Notes Live Holding quarterly revenues of --. FAT Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$59.5M is higher than Notes Live Holding's net income of --. Notably, FAT Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Notes Live Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FAT Brands, Inc. is 0.01x versus -- for Notes Live Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.