FAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of -46.41% compared to FAT Brands's net margin of 10.24%. FAT Brands's return on equity of -- beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6%.

FAT Brands has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 382.14%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $208.39 which suggests that it could fall by -0.55%. Given that FAT Brands has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe FAT Brands is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.616, which suggesting that the stock is 61.639% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.442%.

FAT Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 20%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. FAT Brands pays -9.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FAT Brands quarterly revenues are $145.3M, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $3.2B. FAT Brands's net income of -$67.4M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M. Notably, FAT Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 23.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FAT Brands is 0.08x versus 2.12x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of -46.41% compared to FAT Brands's net margin of 8.73%. FAT Brands's return on equity of -- beat Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27%.

FAT Brands has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 382.14%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $183.06 which suggests that it could grow by 21.31%. Given that FAT Brands has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe FAT Brands is more attractive than Brinker International.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.616, which suggesting that the stock is 61.639% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.618%.

FAT Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 20%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FAT Brands pays -9.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FAT Brands quarterly revenues are $145.3M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. FAT Brands's net income of -$67.4M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $118.5M. Notably, FAT Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brinker International's PE ratio is 26.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FAT Brands is 0.08x versus 1.44x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rave Restaurant Group has a net margin of -46.41% compared to FAT Brands's net margin of 21.16%. FAT Brands's return on equity of -- beat Rave Restaurant Group's return on equity of 21.27%.

FAT Brands has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 382.14%. On the other hand Rave Restaurant Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -3.1%. Given that FAT Brands has higher upside potential than Rave Restaurant Group, analysts believe FAT Brands is more attractive than Rave Restaurant Group.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.616, which suggesting that the stock is 61.639% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rave Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.135, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.49%.

FAT Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 20%. Rave Restaurant Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FAT Brands pays -9.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Rave Restaurant Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FAT Brands quarterly revenues are $145.3M, which are larger than Rave Restaurant Group quarterly revenues of $2.9M. FAT Brands's net income of -$67.4M is lower than Rave Restaurant Group's net income of $607K. Notably, FAT Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rave Restaurant Group's PE ratio is 14.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FAT Brands is 0.08x versus 3.12x for Rave Restaurant Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of -46.41% compared to FAT Brands's net margin of 16.53%. FAT Brands's return on equity of -- beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

FAT Brands has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 382.14%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $312.51 which suggests that it could grow by 32.19%. Given that FAT Brands has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe FAT Brands is more attractive than Wingstop.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.616, which suggesting that the stock is 61.639% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 2.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.691%.

FAT Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 20%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. FAT Brands pays -9.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FAT Brands quarterly revenues are $145.3M, which are smaller than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $161.8M. FAT Brands's net income of -$67.4M is lower than Wingstop's net income of $26.8M. Notably, FAT Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wingstop's PE ratio is 63.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FAT Brands is 0.08x versus 11.10x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.