FAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flanigan'S Enterprises has a net margin of -31.22% compared to FAT Brands's net margin of 0.4%. FAT Brands's return on equity of -- beat Flanigan'S Enterprises's return on equity of 4.46%.

FAT Brands has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 176.24%. On the other hand Flanigan'S Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FAT Brands has higher upside potential than Flanigan'S Enterprises, analysts believe FAT Brands is more attractive than Flanigan'S Enterprises.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.815, which suggesting that the stock is 81.459% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan'S Enterprises has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.806%.

FAT Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.31%. Flanigan'S Enterprises offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. FAT Brands pays -18.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises pays out 27.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FAT Brands quarterly revenues are $143.4M, which are larger than Flanigan'S Enterprises quarterly revenues of $46M. FAT Brands's net income of -$44.8M is lower than Flanigan'S Enterprises's net income of $184K. Notably, FAT Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flanigan'S Enterprises's PE ratio is 13.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FAT Brands is 0.15x versus 0.24x for Flanigan'S Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BJ's Restaurants has a net margin of -31.22% compared to FAT Brands's net margin of -0.9%. FAT Brands's return on equity of -- beat BJ's Restaurants's return on equity of 8.05%.

FAT Brands has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 176.24%. On the other hand BJ's Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $38.88 which suggests that it could grow by 6.07%. Given that FAT Brands has higher upside potential than BJ's Restaurants, analysts believe FAT Brands is more attractive than BJ's Restaurants.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.815, which suggesting that the stock is 81.459% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BJ's Restaurants has a beta of 2.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.01%.

FAT Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.31%. BJ's Restaurants offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FAT Brands pays -18.14% of its earnings as a dividend. BJ's Restaurants pays out 0.16% of its earnings as a dividend. BJ's Restaurants's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FAT Brands quarterly revenues are $143.4M, which are smaller than BJ's Restaurants quarterly revenues of $325.7M. FAT Brands's net income of -$44.8M is lower than BJ's Restaurants's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, FAT Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BJ's Restaurants's PE ratio is 29.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FAT Brands is 0.15x versus 0.65x for BJ's Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of -31.22% compared to FAT Brands's net margin of 3.47%. FAT Brands's return on equity of -- beat Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 36.82%.

FAT Brands has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 176.24%. On the other hand Cheesecake Factory has an analysts' consensus of $49.41 which suggests that it could fall by -2.63%. Given that FAT Brands has higher upside potential than Cheesecake Factory, analysts believe FAT Brands is more attractive than Cheesecake Factory.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.815, which suggesting that the stock is 81.459% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.269%.

FAT Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.31%. Cheesecake Factory offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. FAT Brands pays -18.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory pays out 52.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FAT Brands quarterly revenues are $143.4M, which are smaller than Cheesecake Factory quarterly revenues of $865.5M. FAT Brands's net income of -$44.8M is lower than Cheesecake Factory's net income of $30M. Notably, FAT Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cheesecake Factory's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FAT Brands is 0.15x versus 0.69x for Cheesecake Factory. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Notes Live Holding has a net margin of -31.22% compared to FAT Brands's net margin of --. FAT Brands's return on equity of -- beat Notes Live Holding's return on equity of --.

FAT Brands has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 176.24%. On the other hand Notes Live Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FAT Brands has higher upside potential than Notes Live Holding, analysts believe FAT Brands is more attractive than Notes Live Holding.

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.815, which suggesting that the stock is 81.459% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Notes Live Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FAT Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.31%. Notes Live Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FAT Brands pays -18.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Notes Live Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FAT Brands quarterly revenues are $143.4M, which are larger than Notes Live Holding quarterly revenues of --. FAT Brands's net income of -$44.8M is higher than Notes Live Holding's net income of --. Notably, FAT Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Notes Live Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FAT Brands is 0.15x versus -- for Notes Live Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.