EZPW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FirstCash Holdings has a net margin of 8.29% compared to EZCORP's net margin of 9.99%. EZCORP's return on equity of 10.97% beat FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 13.86%.

EZCORP has a consensus price target of $20.75, signalling upside risk potential of 40.2%. On the other hand FirstCash Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $147.60 which suggests that it could grow by 10.21%. Given that EZCORP has higher upside potential than FirstCash Holdings, analysts believe EZCORP is more attractive than FirstCash Holdings.

EZCORP has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.309% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.635, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.496%.

EZCORP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FirstCash Holdings offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. EZCORP pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings pays out 25.41% of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EZCORP quarterly revenues are $306.3M, which are smaller than FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues of $836.4M. EZCORP's net income of $25.4M is lower than FirstCash Holdings's net income of $83.6M. Notably, EZCORP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.44x while FirstCash Holdings's PE ratio is 21.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EZCORP is 1.03x versus 1.78x for FirstCash Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Market Capital has a net margin of 8.29% compared to EZCORP's net margin of -3.85%. EZCORP's return on equity of 10.97% beat Old Market Capital's return on equity of -7.14%.

EZCORP has a consensus price target of $20.75, signalling upside risk potential of 40.2%. On the other hand Old Market Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EZCORP has higher upside potential than Old Market Capital, analysts believe EZCORP is more attractive than Old Market Capital.

EZCORP has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.309% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Market Capital has a beta of 0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.82%.

EZCORP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Old Market Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EZCORP pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Old Market Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EZCORP quarterly revenues are $306.3M, which are larger than Old Market Capital quarterly revenues of $3.2M. EZCORP's net income of $25.4M is higher than Old Market Capital's net income of -$124K. Notably, EZCORP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.44x while Old Market Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EZCORP is 1.03x versus 8.62x for Old Market Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLM has a net margin of 8.29% compared to EZCORP's net margin of 52.42%. EZCORP's return on equity of 10.97% beat SLM's return on equity of 28.08%.

EZCORP has a consensus price target of $20.75, signalling upside risk potential of 40.2%. On the other hand SLM has an analysts' consensus of $33.36 which suggests that it could grow by 3.25%. Given that EZCORP has higher upside potential than SLM, analysts believe EZCORP is more attractive than SLM.

EZCORP has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.309% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLM has a beta of 1.049, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.92%.

EZCORP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SLM offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. EZCORP pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SLM pays out 19.31% of its earnings as a dividend. SLM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EZCORP quarterly revenues are $306.3M, which are smaller than SLM quarterly revenues of $581M. EZCORP's net income of $25.4M is lower than SLM's net income of $304.5M. Notably, EZCORP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.44x while SLM's PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EZCORP is 1.03x versus 3.71x for SLM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upstart Holdings has a net margin of 8.29% compared to EZCORP's net margin of -1.15%. EZCORP's return on equity of 10.97% beat Upstart Holdings's return on equity of -10.67%.

EZCORP has a consensus price target of $20.75, signalling upside risk potential of 40.2%. On the other hand Upstart Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $58.21 which suggests that it could grow by 21.45%. Given that EZCORP has higher upside potential than Upstart Holdings, analysts believe EZCORP is more attractive than Upstart Holdings.

EZCORP has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.309% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upstart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EZCORP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upstart Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EZCORP pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upstart Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EZCORP quarterly revenues are $306.3M, which are larger than Upstart Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.4M. EZCORP's net income of $25.4M is higher than Upstart Holdings's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, EZCORP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.44x while Upstart Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EZCORP is 1.03x versus 6.12x for Upstart Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.