EFSC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 37.29% compared to Enterprise Financial Services's net margin of 31.58%. Enterprise Financial Services's return on equity of 10.46% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.79%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a consensus price target of $65.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.36%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $28.25 which suggests that it could grow by 10.45%. Given that Enterprise Financial Services has higher upside potential than Bar Harbor Bankshares, analysts believe Enterprise Financial Services is more attractive than Bar Harbor Bankshares.

Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.827% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.497%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Enterprise Financial Services pays 21.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 36.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enterprise Financial Services quarterly revenues are $135.6M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $38.6M. Enterprise Financial Services's net income of $50.6M is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $12.2M. Notably, Enterprise Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 11.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enterprise Financial Services is 4.02x versus 3.21x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 37.29% compared to Enterprise Financial Services's net margin of 16.32%. Enterprise Financial Services's return on equity of 10.46% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a consensus price target of $65.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.36%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.57%. Given that Enterprise Financial Services has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Enterprise Financial Services is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.827% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Enterprise Financial Services pays 21.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enterprise Financial Services quarterly revenues are $135.6M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Enterprise Financial Services's net income of $50.6M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Enterprise Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enterprise Financial Services is 4.02x versus 2.91x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntington Bancshares has a net margin of 37.29% compared to Enterprise Financial Services's net margin of 27.59%. Enterprise Financial Services's return on equity of 10.46% beat Huntington Bancshares's return on equity of 8.48%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a consensus price target of $65.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.36%. On the other hand Huntington Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $18.54 which suggests that it could grow by 13.45%. Given that Enterprise Financial Services has higher upside potential than Huntington Bancshares, analysts believe Enterprise Financial Services is more attractive than Huntington Bancshares.

Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.827% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Bancshares has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.841%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Huntington Bancshares offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Enterprise Financial Services pays 21.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Bancshares pays out 53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enterprise Financial Services quarterly revenues are $135.6M, which are smaller than Huntington Bancshares quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Enterprise Financial Services's net income of $50.6M is lower than Huntington Bancshares's net income of $517M. Notably, Enterprise Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Huntington Bancshares's PE ratio is 15.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enterprise Financial Services is 4.02x versus 3.34x for Huntington Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 37.29% compared to Enterprise Financial Services's net margin of 27.77%. Enterprise Financial Services's return on equity of 10.46% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a consensus price target of $65.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.36%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.28%. Given that Enterprise Financial Services has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Enterprise Financial Services is more attractive than Park National.

Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.827% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Park National offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Enterprise Financial Services pays 21.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enterprise Financial Services quarterly revenues are $135.6M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Enterprise Financial Services's net income of $50.6M is higher than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Enterprise Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.97x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enterprise Financial Services is 4.02x versus 5.67x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.