Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
73
DMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.69
Seasonality move
:
-4.99%
Day range:
$25.68 - $25.88
52-week range:
$12.05 - $27.11
Dividend yield:
0.88%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
4.8K
Avg. volume:
13.3K
1-year change:
71.19%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DMAT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMET
VanEck Green Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DMAT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
|
$25.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 0.88% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$29.36 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 3.29% | -- |
|
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
|
$85.51 | -- | -- | -- | $1.17 | 3.23% | -- |
|
GMET
VanEck Green Metals ETF
|
$35.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.39 | 1.12% | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
$62.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0.42% | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
$39.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 2.41% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DMAT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.937 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 0.698 | -- | -- |
|
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.692 | -- | -- |
|
GMET
VanEck Green Metals ETF
|
-- | 2.184 | -- | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | 1.422 | -- | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
-- | 0.814 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DMAT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMET
VanEck Green Metals ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns DMAT or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's net margin of --. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About DMAT or CUT?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe Global X Disruptive Materials ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is DMAT or CUT More Risky?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.268%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock DMAT or CUT?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios DMAT or CUT?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Disruptive Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns DMAT or EFAV?
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's net margin of --. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF-- -- -- EFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About DMAT or EFAV?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF, analysts believe Global X Disruptive Materials ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF0 0 0 EFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF0 0 0 -
Is DMAT or EFAV More Risky?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF has a beta of 0.762, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.816%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock DMAT or EFAV?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF offers a yield of 3.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios DMAT or EFAV?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Disruptive Materials ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF-- -- -- -- EFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns DMAT or GMET?
VanEck Green Metals ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's net margin of --. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Green Metals ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF-- -- -- GMETVanEck Green Metals ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About DMAT or GMET?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Green Metals ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Green Metals ETF, analysts believe Global X Disruptive Materials ETF is more attractive than VanEck Green Metals ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF0 0 0 GMETVanEck Green Metals ETF0 0 0 -
Is DMAT or GMET More Risky?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Green Metals ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock DMAT or GMET?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. VanEck Green Metals ETF offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Green Metals ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios DMAT or GMET?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Green Metals ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Green Metals ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Green Metals ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Disruptive Materials ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Green Metals ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF-- -- -- -- GMETVanEck Green Metals ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns DMAT or LIT?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's net margin of --. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF-- -- -- LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About DMAT or LIT?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF, analysts believe Global X Disruptive Materials ETF is more attractive than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF0 0 0 LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF0 0 0 -
Is DMAT or LIT More Risky?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.582%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock DMAT or LIT?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios DMAT or LIT?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Disruptive Materials ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF-- -- -- -- LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns DMAT or VEGI?
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's net margin of --. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF-- -- -- VEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About DMAT or VEGI?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF, analysts believe Global X Disruptive Materials ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF0 0 0 VEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF0 0 0 -
Is DMAT or VEGI More Risky?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF has a beta of 0.842, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.786%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock DMAT or VEGI?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios DMAT or VEGI?
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Disruptive Materials ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Disruptive Materials ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income DMATGlobal X Disruptive Materials ETF-- -- -- -- VEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 17
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 18.2% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 17
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 13.35% over the past day.
Buy
75
AFRM alert for Dec 17
Affirm Holdings, Inc. [AFRM] is up 11.77% over the past day.
