CUB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

dMY Squared Technology Group has a net margin of -- compared to Lionheart Holdings's net margin of --. Lionheart Holdings's return on equity of -- beat dMY Squared Technology Group's return on equity of --.

Lionheart Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand dMY Squared Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lionheart Holdings has higher upside potential than dMY Squared Technology Group, analysts believe Lionheart Holdings is more attractive than dMY Squared Technology Group.

Lionheart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison dMY Squared Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lionheart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. dMY Squared Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lionheart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. dMY Squared Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lionheart Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than dMY Squared Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Lionheart Holdings's net income of $3.2M is higher than dMY Squared Technology Group's net income of $145.5K. Notably, Lionheart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while dMY Squared Technology Group's PE ratio is 59.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionheart Holdings is -- versus -- for dMY Squared Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graf Global has a net margin of -- compared to Lionheart Holdings's net margin of --. Lionheart Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Graf Global's return on equity of --.

Lionheart Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graf Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lionheart Holdings has higher upside potential than Graf Global, analysts believe Lionheart Holdings is more attractive than Graf Global.

Lionheart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graf Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lionheart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graf Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lionheart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graf Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lionheart Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graf Global quarterly revenues of --. Lionheart Holdings's net income of $3.2M is higher than Graf Global's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Lionheart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Graf Global's PE ratio is 98.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionheart Holdings is -- versus -- for Graf Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coliseum Acquisition has a net margin of -- compared to Lionheart Holdings's net margin of --. Lionheart Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Coliseum Acquisition's return on equity of --.

Lionheart Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coliseum Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lionheart Holdings has higher upside potential than Coliseum Acquisition, analysts believe Lionheart Holdings is more attractive than Coliseum Acquisition.

Lionheart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coliseum Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lionheart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coliseum Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lionheart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coliseum Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lionheart Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coliseum Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. Lionheart Holdings's net income of $3.2M is higher than Coliseum Acquisition's net income of -$694.9K. Notably, Lionheart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coliseum Acquisition's PE ratio is 1,108.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionheart Holdings is -- versus -- for Coliseum Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unusual Machines has a net margin of -- compared to Lionheart Holdings's net margin of -140.03%. Lionheart Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Unusual Machines's return on equity of --.

Lionheart Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unusual Machines has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could fall by -14.95%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Lionheart Holdings, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Lionheart Holdings.

Lionheart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lionheart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unusual Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lionheart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unusual Machines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lionheart Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unusual Machines quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Lionheart Holdings's net income of $3.2M is higher than Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Lionheart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Unusual Machines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionheart Holdings is -- versus -- for Unusual Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.