Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
58
CUB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.79
Seasonality move
:
4.97%
Day range:
$10.79 - $10.79
52-week range:
$10.25 - $10.79
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
40.47x
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
1.40x
Volume:
1.7K
Avg. volume:
10.6K
1-year change:
5.17%
Market cap:
$331.8M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
$0.27
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CUB
Lionheart Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.
|
$39.4M | $0.41 | 12.97% | 297.28% | $15.14 |
|
INNI
Innovaro, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEIL
Methes Energies International Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MOMT
MoneyOnMobile, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NGRC
National Graphite Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CUB
Lionheart Holdings
|
$10.79 | -- | $331.8M | 40.47x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.
|
$12.37 | $15.14 | $461M | 13.40x | $0.42 | 13.46% | 2.96x |
|
INNI
Innovaro, Inc.
|
$0.0196 | -- | $316.6K | -- | $0.00 | 204.08% | 0.40x |
|
MEIL
Methes Energies International Ltd.
|
$0.0008 | -- | $75.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.10x |
|
MOMT
MoneyOnMobile, Inc.
|
$0.0330 | -- | $127.8K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
|
NGRC
National Graphite Corp.
|
$0.0230 | -- | $3.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CUB
Lionheart Holdings
|
-- | 0.059 | -- | 3.90x |
|
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.
|
55.31% | -0.024 | 171.21% | 2.46x |
|
INNI
Innovaro, Inc.
|
-- | 4.203 | -- | -- |
|
MEIL
Methes Energies International Ltd.
|
-- | 2,214.871 | -- | -- |
|
MOMT
MoneyOnMobile, Inc.
|
-- | 759.766 | -- | -- |
|
NGRC
National Graphite Corp.
|
-- | 0.369 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CUB
Lionheart Holdings
|
-- | -$199.8K | 3.86% | 3.86% | -- | -$105.9K |
|
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.
|
$35.4M | $47.9M | 2.15% | 4.78% | 108.98% | $15.3M |
|
INNI
Innovaro, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEIL
Methes Energies International Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MOMT
MoneyOnMobile, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NGRC
National Graphite Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Lionheart Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CUB or CCAP?
Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lionheart Holdings's net margin of 19.33%. Lionheart Holdings's return on equity of 3.86% beat Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUBLionheart Holdings-- $0.07 $236.4M CCAPCrescent Capital BDC, Inc.80.64% $0.23 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CUB or CCAP?
Lionheart Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.14 which suggests that it could grow by 22.42%. Given that Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lionheart Holdings, analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. is more attractive than Lionheart Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUBLionheart Holdings0 0 0 CCAPCrescent Capital BDC, Inc.3 2 0 -
Is CUB or CCAP More Risky?
Lionheart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.553, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.683%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUB or CCAP?
Lionheart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 13.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Lionheart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. pays out 180.34% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUB or CCAP?
Lionheart Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $43.9M. Lionheart Holdings's net income of $2.2M is lower than Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s net income of $8.5M. Notably, Lionheart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.47x while Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionheart Holdings is -- versus 2.96x for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUBLionheart Holdings-- 40.47x -- $2.2M CCAPCrescent Capital BDC, Inc.2.96x 13.40x $43.9M $8.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CUB or INNI?
Innovaro, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lionheart Holdings's net margin of --. Lionheart Holdings's return on equity of 3.86% beat Innovaro, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUBLionheart Holdings-- $0.07 $236.4M INNIInnovaro, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CUB or INNI?
Lionheart Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Innovaro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lionheart Holdings has higher upside potential than Innovaro, Inc., analysts believe Lionheart Holdings is more attractive than Innovaro, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUBLionheart Holdings0 0 0 INNIInnovaro, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CUB or INNI More Risky?
Lionheart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovaro, Inc. has a beta of 104.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10329.288%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUB or INNI?
Lionheart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innovaro, Inc. offers a yield of 204.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lionheart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innovaro, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUB or INNI?
Lionheart Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Innovaro, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lionheart Holdings's net income of $2.2M is higher than Innovaro, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Lionheart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.47x while Innovaro, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionheart Holdings is -- versus 0.40x for Innovaro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUBLionheart Holdings-- 40.47x -- $2.2M INNIInnovaro, Inc.0.40x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CUB or MEIL?
Methes Energies International Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lionheart Holdings's net margin of --. Lionheart Holdings's return on equity of 3.86% beat Methes Energies International Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUBLionheart Holdings-- $0.07 $236.4M MEILMethes Energies International Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CUB or MEIL?
Lionheart Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Methes Energies International Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lionheart Holdings has higher upside potential than Methes Energies International Ltd., analysts believe Lionheart Holdings is more attractive than Methes Energies International Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUBLionheart Holdings0 0 0 MEILMethes Energies International Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CUB or MEIL More Risky?
Lionheart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Methes Energies International Ltd. has a beta of 214.263, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21326.345%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUB or MEIL?
Lionheart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Methes Energies International Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lionheart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Methes Energies International Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUB or MEIL?
Lionheart Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Methes Energies International Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lionheart Holdings's net income of $2.2M is higher than Methes Energies International Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Lionheart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.47x while Methes Energies International Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionheart Holdings is -- versus 0.10x for Methes Energies International Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUBLionheart Holdings-- 40.47x -- $2.2M MEILMethes Energies International Ltd.0.10x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CUB or MOMT?
MoneyOnMobile, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lionheart Holdings's net margin of --. Lionheart Holdings's return on equity of 3.86% beat MoneyOnMobile, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUBLionheart Holdings-- $0.07 $236.4M MOMTMoneyOnMobile, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CUB or MOMT?
Lionheart Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MoneyOnMobile, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28687.88%. Given that MoneyOnMobile, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lionheart Holdings, analysts believe MoneyOnMobile, Inc. is more attractive than Lionheart Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUBLionheart Holdings0 0 0 MOMTMoneyOnMobile, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CUB or MOMT More Risky?
Lionheart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MoneyOnMobile, Inc. has a beta of 207.827, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20682.72%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUB or MOMT?
Lionheart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MoneyOnMobile, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lionheart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MoneyOnMobile, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUB or MOMT?
Lionheart Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than MoneyOnMobile, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lionheart Holdings's net income of $2.2M is higher than MoneyOnMobile, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Lionheart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.47x while MoneyOnMobile, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionheart Holdings is -- versus 0.02x for MoneyOnMobile, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUBLionheart Holdings-- 40.47x -- $2.2M MOMTMoneyOnMobile, Inc.0.02x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CUB or NGRC?
National Graphite Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Lionheart Holdings's net margin of --. Lionheart Holdings's return on equity of 3.86% beat National Graphite Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUBLionheart Holdings-- $0.07 $236.4M NGRCNational Graphite Corp.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CUB or NGRC?
Lionheart Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand National Graphite Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lionheart Holdings has higher upside potential than National Graphite Corp., analysts believe Lionheart Holdings is more attractive than National Graphite Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUBLionheart Holdings0 0 0 NGRCNational Graphite Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CUB or NGRC More Risky?
Lionheart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Graphite Corp. has a beta of -1.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 296.179%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUB or NGRC?
Lionheart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National Graphite Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lionheart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Graphite Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUB or NGRC?
Lionheart Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than National Graphite Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Lionheart Holdings's net income of $2.2M is higher than National Graphite Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Lionheart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.47x while National Graphite Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionheart Holdings is -- versus -- for National Graphite Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUBLionheart Holdings-- 40.47x -- $2.2M NGRCNational Graphite Corp.-- -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
