CRUS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel Corp. has a net margin of 24.17% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s net margin of -2.44%. Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.22% beat Intel Corp.'s return on equity of 0.02%.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $146.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.75%. On the other hand Intel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $47.12 which suggests that it could grow by 9.32%. Given that Intel Corp. has higher upside potential than Cirrus Logic, Inc., analysts believe Intel Corp. is more attractive than Cirrus Logic, Inc..

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel Corp. has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.555%.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Cirrus Logic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel Corp. pays out 8.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $580.6M, which are smaller than Intel Corp. quarterly revenues of $13.7B. Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s net income of $140.3M is higher than Intel Corp.'s net income of -$333M. Notably, Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while Intel Corp.'s PE ratio is 5,117.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic, Inc. is 3.74x versus 3.69x for Intel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 24.17% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s net margin of 91.65%. Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.22% beat Marvell Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.3%.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $146.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.75%. On the other hand Marvell Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $115.03 which suggests that it could grow by 48.41%. Given that Marvell Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cirrus Logic, Inc., analysts believe Marvell Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Cirrus Logic, Inc..

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.972, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.186%.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Cirrus Logic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology, Inc. pays out 23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $580.6M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s net income of $140.3M is lower than Marvell Technology, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while Marvell Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic, Inc. is 3.74x versus 8.68x for Marvell Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 24.17% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s net margin of 38.41%. Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.22% beat Micron Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98%.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $146.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.75%. On the other hand Micron Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $399.61 which suggests that it could grow by 5.25%. Given that Cirrus Logic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Micron Technology, Inc., analysts believe Cirrus Logic, Inc. is more attractive than Micron Technology, Inc..

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.395%.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Cirrus Logic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc. pays out 6.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $580.6M, which are smaller than Micron Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.6B. Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s net income of $140.3M is lower than Micron Technology, Inc.'s net income of $5.2B. Notably, Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while Micron Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic, Inc. is 3.74x versus 10.13x for Micron Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of 24.17% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s net margin of 63.06%. Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.22% beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 111.28%.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $146.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.75%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $264.25 which suggests that it could grow by 46.76%. Given that NVIDIA Corp. has higher upside potential than Cirrus Logic, Inc., analysts believe NVIDIA Corp. is more attractive than Cirrus Logic, Inc..

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a beta of 1.124, which suggesting that the stock is 12.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.332, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.182%.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Cirrus Logic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 0.82% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cirrus Logic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $580.6M, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $68.1B. Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s net income of $140.3M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $43B. Notably, Cirrus Logic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 36.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cirrus Logic, Inc. is 3.74x versus 20.44x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.