CRSR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Socket Mobile has a net margin of -17% compared to Corsair Gaming's net margin of -28.81%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of -12.03% beat Socket Mobile's return on equity of -7.3%.

Corsair Gaming has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 38.61%. On the other hand Socket Mobile has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 200.75%. Given that Socket Mobile has higher upside potential than Corsair Gaming, analysts believe Socket Mobile is more attractive than Corsair Gaming.

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Socket Mobile has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.379%.

Corsair Gaming has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Socket Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corsair Gaming pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Socket Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corsair Gaming quarterly revenues are $304.2M, which are larger than Socket Mobile quarterly revenues of $3.9M. Corsair Gaming's net income of -$51.7M is lower than Socket Mobile's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Corsair Gaming's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Socket Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corsair Gaming is 0.52x versus 0.54x for Socket Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of -17% compared to Corsair Gaming's net margin of 6.65%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of -12.03% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 33.98%.

Corsair Gaming has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 38.61%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $41.93 which suggests that it could grow by 29.41%. Given that Corsair Gaming has higher upside potential than Super Micro Computer, analysts believe Corsair Gaming is more attractive than Super Micro Computer.

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.097%.

Corsair Gaming has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corsair Gaming pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corsair Gaming quarterly revenues are $304.2M, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Corsair Gaming's net income of -$51.7M is lower than Super Micro Computer's net income of $352.7M. Notably, Corsair Gaming's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 16.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corsair Gaming is 0.52x versus 1.31x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of -17% compared to Corsair Gaming's net margin of -105.32%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of -12.03% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

Corsair Gaming has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 38.61%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 493.35%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Corsair Gaming, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Corsair Gaming.

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 315.934%.

Corsair Gaming has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corsair Gaming pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corsair Gaming quarterly revenues are $304.2M, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Corsair Gaming's net income of -$51.7M is lower than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Corsair Gaming's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corsair Gaming is 0.52x versus 0.05x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zebra Technologies has a net margin of -17% compared to Corsair Gaming's net margin of 10.92%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of -12.03% beat Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 11.99%.

Corsair Gaming has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 38.61%. On the other hand Zebra Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $416.07 which suggests that it could grow by 6.51%. Given that Corsair Gaming has higher upside potential than Zebra Technologies, analysts believe Corsair Gaming is more attractive than Zebra Technologies.

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.452%.

Corsair Gaming has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zebra Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corsair Gaming pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zebra Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corsair Gaming quarterly revenues are $304.2M, which are smaller than Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Corsair Gaming's net income of -$51.7M is lower than Zebra Technologies's net income of $137M. Notably, Corsair Gaming's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zebra Technologies's PE ratio is 53.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corsair Gaming is 0.52x versus 4.35x for Zebra Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.