Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
46
COLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.34
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$10.34 - $10.34
52-week range:
$9.95 - $10.42
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
97.55x
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
1.70x
Volume:
110
Avg. volume:
25.7K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$82.1M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
$0.11
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COLA
Columbus Acquisition Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BTOG
Bit Origin Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUFU
BitFuFu, Inc.
|
$129.2M | $0.02 | 10.52% | -81.74% | $6.95 |
|
LGHL
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
|
$108.6M | $0.26 | -0.28% | 42.3% | $14.56 |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COLA
Columbus Acquisition Corp.
|
$10.34 | -- | $82.1M | 97.55x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BTOG
Bit Origin Ltd.
|
$0.18 | -- | $15.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 151.52x |
|
FUFU
BitFuFu, Inc.
|
$2.50 | $6.95 | $416.2M | 6.57x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.88x |
|
LGHL
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
|
$3.00 | -- | $19.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
|
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
|
$9.07 | $14.56 | $1.6B | 10.90x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.98x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group Ltd.
|
$1.05 | -- | $38.9M | 61.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 11.68x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COLA
Columbus Acquisition Corp.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 6.01x |
|
BTOG
Bit Origin Ltd.
|
-- | 3.378 | -- | -- |
|
FUFU
BitFuFu, Inc.
|
46.75% | 1.234 | 31.15% | 1.77x |
|
LGHL
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
|
8.46% | 2.945 | -1091.78% | 1.12x |
|
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
|
17.64% | -0.673 | 9.11% | 0.62x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group Ltd.
|
-- | 1.092 | -- | 3.64x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COLA
Columbus Acquisition Corp.
|
-- | -$102.9K | 2.95% | 2.96% | -- | -$98.9K |
|
BTOG
Bit Origin Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUFU
BitFuFu, Inc.
|
$7.2M | $4.1M | 19.32% | 37.73% | 2.25% | -$177.9M |
|
LGHL
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -47.1% | -50.99% | -- | -- |
|
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
|
$168.1M | $85.8M | 17.76% | 22.17% | 48.94% | $153.8M |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 2.73% | -- | -- |
Columbus Acquisition Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns COLA or BTOG?
Bit Origin Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s net margin of --. Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity of 2.96% beat Bit Origin Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.-- $0.05 $48.3M BTOGBit Origin Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About COLA or BTOG?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bit Origin Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbus Acquisition Corp. has higher upside potential than Bit Origin Ltd., analysts believe Columbus Acquisition Corp. is more attractive than Bit Origin Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.0 0 0 BTOGBit Origin Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is COLA or BTOG More Risky?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bit Origin Ltd. has a beta of 1.910, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.008%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COLA or BTOG?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bit Origin Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbus Acquisition Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bit Origin Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COLA or BTOG?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Bit Origin Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s net income of $387.8K is higher than Bit Origin Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 97.55x while Bit Origin Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus Acquisition Corp. is -- versus 151.52x for Bit Origin Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.-- 97.55x -- $387.8K BTOGBit Origin Ltd.151.52x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COLA or FUFU?
BitFuFu, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s net margin of 6.4%. Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity of 2.96% beat BitFuFu, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.-- $0.05 $48.3M FUFUBitFuFu, Inc.3.96% $0.07 $409.7M -
What do Analysts Say About COLA or FUFU?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BitFuFu, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.95 which suggests that it could grow by 178.16%. Given that BitFuFu, Inc. has higher upside potential than Columbus Acquisition Corp., analysts believe BitFuFu, Inc. is more attractive than Columbus Acquisition Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.0 0 0 FUFUBitFuFu, Inc.3 1 0 -
Is COLA or FUFU More Risky?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BitFuFu, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COLA or FUFU?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BitFuFu, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbus Acquisition Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BitFuFu, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COLA or FUFU?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BitFuFu, Inc. quarterly revenues of $180.7M. Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s net income of $387.8K is lower than BitFuFu, Inc.'s net income of $11.6M. Notably, Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 97.55x while BitFuFu, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus Acquisition Corp. is -- versus 0.88x for BitFuFu, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.-- 97.55x -- $387.8K FUFUBitFuFu, Inc.0.88x 6.57x $180.7M $11.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns COLA or LGHL?
Lion Group Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s net margin of --. Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity of 2.96% beat Lion Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -50.99%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.-- $0.05 $48.3M LGHLLion Group Holding Ltd.-- -- $24.4M -
What do Analysts Say About COLA or LGHL?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lion Group Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbus Acquisition Corp. has higher upside potential than Lion Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe Columbus Acquisition Corp. is more attractive than Lion Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.0 0 0 LGHLLion Group Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is COLA or LGHL More Risky?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lion Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 2.464, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.361%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COLA or LGHL?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lion Group Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbus Acquisition Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lion Group Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COLA or LGHL?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Lion Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s net income of $387.8K is higher than Lion Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 97.55x while Lion Group Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus Acquisition Corp. is -- versus 0.02x for Lion Group Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.-- 97.55x -- $387.8K LGHLLion Group Holding Ltd.0.02x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COLA or TIGR?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s net margin of 30.81%. Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity of 2.96% beat UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.-- $0.05 $48.3M TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.95.87% $0.29 $989M -
What do Analysts Say About COLA or TIGR?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.56 which suggests that it could grow by 60.51%. Given that UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Columbus Acquisition Corp., analysts believe UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Columbus Acquisition Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.0 0 0 TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.8 0 1 -
Is COLA or TIGR More Risky?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.366, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.436%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COLA or TIGR?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbus Acquisition Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COLA or TIGR?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than UP Fintech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of $175.4M. Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s net income of $387.8K is lower than UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net income of $54M. Notably, Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 97.55x while UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus Acquisition Corp. is -- versus 2.98x for UP Fintech Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.-- 97.55x -- $387.8K TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.2.98x 10.90x $175.4M $54M
-
Which has Higher Returns COLA or TOP?
TOP Financial Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s net margin of --. Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity of 2.96% beat TOP Financial Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.-- $0.05 $48.3M TOPTOP Financial Group Ltd.-- -- $40.5M -
What do Analysts Say About COLA or TOP?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOP Financial Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbus Acquisition Corp. has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group Ltd., analysts believe Columbus Acquisition Corp. is more attractive than TOP Financial Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.0 0 0 TOPTOP Financial Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is COLA or TOP More Risky?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COLA or TOP?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOP Financial Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbus Acquisition Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COLA or TOP?
Columbus Acquisition Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than TOP Financial Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s net income of $387.8K is higher than TOP Financial Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Columbus Acquisition Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 97.55x while TOP Financial Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus Acquisition Corp. is -- versus 11.68x for TOP Financial Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COLAColumbus Acquisition Corp.-- 97.55x -- $387.8K TOPTOP Financial Group Ltd.11.68x 61.61x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
