CMCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caterpillar, Inc. has a net margin of 2.32% compared to Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s net margin of 12.55%. Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s return on equity of 0.67% beat Caterpillar, Inc.'s return on equity of 45.22%.

Columbus McKinnon Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.50, signalling upside risk potential of 89.96%. On the other hand Caterpillar, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $739.29 which suggests that it could grow by 3.08%. Given that Columbus McKinnon Corp. has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, Inc., analysts believe Columbus McKinnon Corp. is more attractive than Caterpillar, Inc..

Columbus McKinnon Corp. has a beta of 1.392, which suggesting that the stock is 39.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caterpillar, Inc. has a beta of 1.526, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.614%.

Columbus McKinnon Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Caterpillar, Inc. offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.51 per share. Columbus McKinnon Corp. pays 156.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar, Inc. pays out 31.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s is not.

Columbus McKinnon Corp. quarterly revenues are $258.7M, which are smaller than Caterpillar, Inc. quarterly revenues of $19.1B. Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s net income of $6M is lower than Caterpillar, Inc.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 65.83x while Caterpillar, Inc.'s PE ratio is 38.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus McKinnon Corp. is 0.39x versus 5.01x for Caterpillar, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gencor Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 2.32% compared to Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s net margin of 14.6%. Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s return on equity of 0.67% beat Gencor Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.33%.

Columbus McKinnon Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.50, signalling upside risk potential of 89.96%. On the other hand Gencor Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.60 which suggests that it could grow by 17.1%. Given that Columbus McKinnon Corp. has higher upside potential than Gencor Industries, Inc., analysts believe Columbus McKinnon Corp. is more attractive than Gencor Industries, Inc..

Columbus McKinnon Corp. has a beta of 1.392, which suggesting that the stock is 39.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gencor Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.518, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.167%.

Columbus McKinnon Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Gencor Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbus McKinnon Corp. pays 156.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Gencor Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Columbus McKinnon Corp. quarterly revenues are $258.7M, which are larger than Gencor Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.6M. Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s net income of $6M is higher than Gencor Industries, Inc.'s net income of $3.4M. Notably, Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 65.83x while Gencor Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus McKinnon Corp. is 0.39x versus 2.05x for Gencor Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GP Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 2.32% compared to Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s net margin of --. Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s return on equity of 0.67% beat GP Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Columbus McKinnon Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.50, signalling upside risk potential of 89.96%. On the other hand GP Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbus McKinnon Corp. has higher upside potential than GP Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Columbus McKinnon Corp. is more attractive than GP Solutions, Inc..

Columbus McKinnon Corp. has a beta of 1.392, which suggesting that the stock is 39.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GP Solutions, Inc. has a beta of -69.784, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7078.399%.

Columbus McKinnon Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. GP Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbus McKinnon Corp. pays 156.52% of its earnings as a dividend. GP Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Columbus McKinnon Corp. quarterly revenues are $258.7M, which are larger than GP Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s net income of $6M is higher than GP Solutions, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 65.83x while GP Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus McKinnon Corp. is 0.39x versus 2.69x for GP Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HIPH World, Inc. has a net margin of 2.32% compared to Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s net margin of --. Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s return on equity of 0.67% beat HIPH World, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.46%.

Columbus McKinnon Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.50, signalling upside risk potential of 89.96%. On the other hand HIPH World, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbus McKinnon Corp. has higher upside potential than HIPH World, Inc., analysts believe Columbus McKinnon Corp. is more attractive than HIPH World, Inc..

Columbus McKinnon Corp. has a beta of 1.392, which suggesting that the stock is 39.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HIPH World, Inc. has a beta of 161.929, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16092.905%.

Columbus McKinnon Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. HIPH World, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Columbus McKinnon Corp. pays 156.52% of its earnings as a dividend. HIPH World, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Columbus McKinnon Corp. quarterly revenues are $258.7M, which are larger than HIPH World, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s net income of $6M is higher than HIPH World, Inc.'s net income of -$93.3K. Notably, Columbus McKinnon Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 65.83x while HIPH World, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbus McKinnon Corp. is 0.39x versus -- for HIPH World, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.