Financhill
Sell
11

CFFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$11.28
Seasonality move :
1.35%
Day range:
$11.28 - $11.28
52-week range:
$9.73 - $11.64
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
2.45x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
10.2K
1-year change:
3.58%
Market cap:
$116M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.15

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CFFS
CF Acquisition Corp VII
-- -- -- -- --
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
$47.3M $0.56 42.32% -33.33% $19.67
DMYY
dMY Squared Technology Group
-- -- -- -- --
GRAF
Graf Global
-- -- -- -- --
MITA
Coliseum Acquisition
-- -- -- -- --
UMAC
Unusual Machines
$2.5M -$0.13 -- -- $10.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CFFS
CF Acquisition Corp VII
$11.28 -- $116M -- $0.00 0% --
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
$18.94 $19.67 $701.9M 7.40x $0.42 10.24% 6.74x
DMYY
dMY Squared Technology Group
$10.65 -- $41.7M 59.33x $0.00 0% --
GRAF
Graf Global
$10.07 -- $289.5M 98.00x $0.00 0% --
MITA
Coliseum Acquisition
$11.51 -- $63.7M 1,108.00x $0.00 0% --
UMAC
Unusual Machines
$16.46 $10.00 $136.6M -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CFFS
CF Acquisition Corp VII
-- 0.073 -- --
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
53.38% 0.633 125.03% 0.80x
DMYY
dMY Squared Technology Group
-- 0.012 -- --
GRAF
Graf Global
-- 0.000 -- --
MITA
Coliseum Acquisition
-- -0.097 -- --
UMAC
Unusual Machines
13.5% 0.000 31.91% 0.87x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CFFS
CF Acquisition Corp VII
-- -$322.3K -- -- -- --
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
-- -- 5.91% 12.68% 172.63% $46.9M
DMYY
dMY Squared Technology Group
-- -$287.8K -- -- -- -$21.3K
GRAF
Graf Global
-- -$195.2K -- -- -- -$585.7K
MITA
Coliseum Acquisition
-- -$1.1M -- -- -- --
UMAC
Unusual Machines
$399.5K -$1.5M -- -- -137.32% -$536.7K

CF Acquisition Corp VII vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CFFS or CCAP?

    Crescent Capital BDC has a net margin of -- compared to CF Acquisition Corp VII's net margin of 84.43%. CF Acquisition Corp VII's return on equity of -- beat Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 12.68%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    -- $0.02 --
    CCAP
    Crescent Capital BDC
    -- $0.41 $1.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CFFS or CCAP?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Crescent Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $19.67 which suggests that it could grow by 3.84%. Given that Crescent Capital BDC has higher upside potential than CF Acquisition Corp VII, analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC is more attractive than CF Acquisition Corp VII.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    0 0 0
    CCAP
    Crescent Capital BDC
    3 1 0
  • Is CFFS or CCAP More Risky?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFFS or CCAP?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crescent Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. CF Acquisition Corp VII pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC pays out 77% of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFFS or CCAP?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Crescent Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $18.1M. CF Acquisition Corp VII's net income of $167.2K is lower than Crescent Capital BDC's net income of $15.3M. Notably, CF Acquisition Corp VII's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crescent Capital BDC's PE ratio is 7.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Acquisition Corp VII is -- versus 6.74x for Crescent Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    -- -- -- $167.2K
    CCAP
    Crescent Capital BDC
    6.74x 7.40x $18.1M $15.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns CFFS or DMYY?

    dMY Squared Technology Group has a net margin of -- compared to CF Acquisition Corp VII's net margin of --. CF Acquisition Corp VII's return on equity of -- beat dMY Squared Technology Group's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    -- $0.02 --
    DMYY
    dMY Squared Technology Group
    -- $0.04 --
  • What do Analysts Say About CFFS or DMYY?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand dMY Squared Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CF Acquisition Corp VII has higher upside potential than dMY Squared Technology Group, analysts believe CF Acquisition Corp VII is more attractive than dMY Squared Technology Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    0 0 0
    DMYY
    dMY Squared Technology Group
    0 0 0
  • Is CFFS or DMYY More Risky?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison dMY Squared Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFFS or DMYY?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. dMY Squared Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Acquisition Corp VII pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. dMY Squared Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFFS or DMYY?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than dMY Squared Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. CF Acquisition Corp VII's net income of $167.2K is higher than dMY Squared Technology Group's net income of $145.5K. Notably, CF Acquisition Corp VII's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while dMY Squared Technology Group's PE ratio is 59.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Acquisition Corp VII is -- versus -- for dMY Squared Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    -- -- -- $167.2K
    DMYY
    dMY Squared Technology Group
    -- 59.33x -- $145.5K
  • Which has Higher Returns CFFS or GRAF?

    Graf Global has a net margin of -- compared to CF Acquisition Corp VII's net margin of --. CF Acquisition Corp VII's return on equity of -- beat Graf Global's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    -- $0.02 --
    GRAF
    Graf Global
    -- $0.10 --
  • What do Analysts Say About CFFS or GRAF?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graf Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CF Acquisition Corp VII has higher upside potential than Graf Global, analysts believe CF Acquisition Corp VII is more attractive than Graf Global.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    0 0 0
    GRAF
    Graf Global
    0 0 0
  • Is CFFS or GRAF More Risky?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graf Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFFS or GRAF?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graf Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Acquisition Corp VII pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graf Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFFS or GRAF?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graf Global quarterly revenues of --. CF Acquisition Corp VII's net income of $167.2K is lower than Graf Global's net income of $2.8M. Notably, CF Acquisition Corp VII's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Graf Global's PE ratio is 98.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Acquisition Corp VII is -- versus -- for Graf Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    -- -- -- $167.2K
    GRAF
    Graf Global
    -- 98.00x -- $2.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns CFFS or MITA?

    Coliseum Acquisition has a net margin of -- compared to CF Acquisition Corp VII's net margin of --. CF Acquisition Corp VII's return on equity of -- beat Coliseum Acquisition's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    -- $0.02 --
    MITA
    Coliseum Acquisition
    -- -$0.11 --
  • What do Analysts Say About CFFS or MITA?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coliseum Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CF Acquisition Corp VII has higher upside potential than Coliseum Acquisition, analysts believe CF Acquisition Corp VII is more attractive than Coliseum Acquisition.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    0 0 0
    MITA
    Coliseum Acquisition
    0 0 0
  • Is CFFS or MITA More Risky?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coliseum Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFFS or MITA?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coliseum Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Acquisition Corp VII pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coliseum Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFFS or MITA?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coliseum Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. CF Acquisition Corp VII's net income of $167.2K is higher than Coliseum Acquisition's net income of -$694.9K. Notably, CF Acquisition Corp VII's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coliseum Acquisition's PE ratio is 1,108.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Acquisition Corp VII is -- versus -- for Coliseum Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    -- -- -- $167.2K
    MITA
    Coliseum Acquisition
    -- 1,108.00x -- -$694.9K
  • Which has Higher Returns CFFS or UMAC?

    Unusual Machines has a net margin of -- compared to CF Acquisition Corp VII's net margin of -140.03%. CF Acquisition Corp VII's return on equity of -- beat Unusual Machines's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    -- $0.02 --
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    26.09% -$0.30 $22.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About CFFS or UMAC?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unusual Machines has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could fall by -14.95%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than CF Acquisition Corp VII, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than CF Acquisition Corp VII.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    0 0 0
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    1 0 0
  • Is CFFS or UMAC More Risky?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFFS or UMAC?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unusual Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Acquisition Corp VII pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unusual Machines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFFS or UMAC?

    CF Acquisition Corp VII quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unusual Machines quarterly revenues of $1.5M. CF Acquisition Corp VII's net income of $167.2K is higher than Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, CF Acquisition Corp VII's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Unusual Machines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Acquisition Corp VII is -- versus -- for Unusual Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFFS
    CF Acquisition Corp VII
    -- -- -- $167.2K
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    -- -- $1.5M -$2.1M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks

Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…

Will American Tower Stock Recover?
Will American Tower Stock Recover?

The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…

Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?

Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…

Stock Ideas

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x

Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7

Inari Medical [NARI] is up 30.64% over the past day.

Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7

Pro-Dex [PDEX] is up 22.41% over the past day.

Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7

Alico [ALCO] is up 18.99% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock