CAPT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Captivision, Inc.'s net margin of 27.45%. Captivision, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc's return on equity of 23.66%.

Captivision, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc has an analysts' consensus of $38.75 which suggests that it could grow by 54.01%. Given that Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc has higher upside potential than Captivision, Inc., analysts believe Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc is more attractive than Captivision, Inc..

Captivision, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc has a beta of 0.503, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.709%.

Captivision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Captivision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc pays out 60.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Captivision, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc quarterly revenues of $68M. Captivision, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc's net income of $18.7M. Notably, Captivision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc's PE ratio is 9.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Captivision, Inc. is 0.82x versus 2.12x for Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ferroglobe PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Captivision, Inc.'s net margin of -4.26%. Captivision, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -16.82%.

Captivision, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferroglobe PLC has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.21%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Captivision, Inc., analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Captivision, Inc..

Captivision, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.404%.

Captivision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ferroglobe PLC offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Captivision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC pays out 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Captivision, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues of $311.7M. Captivision, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Captivision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ferroglobe PLC's PE ratio is 187.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Captivision, Inc. is 0.82x versus 0.64x for Ferroglobe PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Linde Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Captivision, Inc.'s net margin of 22.89%. Captivision, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Linde Plc's return on equity of 18.17%.

Captivision, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Linde Plc has an analysts' consensus of $506.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.33%. Given that Linde Plc has higher upside potential than Captivision, Inc., analysts believe Linde Plc is more attractive than Captivision, Inc..

Captivision, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linde Plc has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.464%.

Captivision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Linde Plc offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Captivision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Linde Plc pays out 40.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Linde Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Captivision, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Linde Plc quarterly revenues of $8.6B. Captivision, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Linde Plc's net income of $2B. Notably, Captivision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Linde Plc's PE ratio is 27.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Captivision, Inc. is 0.82x versus 5.72x for Linde Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rio Tinto Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Captivision, Inc.'s net margin of --. Captivision, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Rio Tinto Plc's return on equity of 17.4%.

Captivision, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rio Tinto Plc has an analysts' consensus of $78.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.79%. Given that Rio Tinto Plc has higher upside potential than Captivision, Inc., analysts believe Rio Tinto Plc is more attractive than Captivision, Inc..

Captivision, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rio Tinto Plc has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.204%.

Captivision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rio Tinto Plc offers a yield of 5.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.48 per share. Captivision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto Plc pays out 56.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Captivision, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rio Tinto Plc quarterly revenues of --. Captivision, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Rio Tinto Plc's net income of --. Notably, Captivision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rio Tinto Plc's PE ratio is 11.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Captivision, Inc. is 0.82x versus 2.23x for Rio Tinto Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.