Is Palantir Stock Going to Crash?
AI and data analytics major Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR) has become something…
Buy
70
CAFG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$27.83
Seasonality move
:
-9.66%
Day range:
$27.25 - $27.72
52-week range:
$20.73 - $27.89
Dividend yield:
0.33%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.4K
Avg. volume:
4.5K
1-year change:
3.99%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
|
$27.25 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.33% | -- |
|
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
$49.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.35 | 1.05% | -- |
|
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
|
$56.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.4% | -- |
|
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
|
$52.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.03% | -- |
|
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
|
$57.74 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0.35% | -- |
|
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
|
$76.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0.7% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
|
-- | 0.590 | -- | -- |
|
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | 0.927 | -- | -- |
|
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.078 | -- | -- |
|
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
|
-- | 1.304 | -- | -- |
|
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.890 | -- | -- |
|
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
|
-- | 0.919 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CAFG or PAMC?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF-- -- -- PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CAFG or PAMC?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF, analysts believe Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF is more attractive than Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF0 0 0 PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 -
Is CAFG or PAMC More Risky?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.002%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAFG or PAMC?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.33%. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAFG or PAMC?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAFG or RFG?
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF-- -- -- RFGInvesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CAFG or RFG?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF, analysts believe Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF0 0 0 RFGInvesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is CAFG or RFG More Risky?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.494%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAFG or RFG?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.33%. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAFG or RFG?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- RFGInvesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAFG or RWJ?
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF-- -- -- RWJInvesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CAFG or RWJ?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF, analysts believe Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF0 0 0 RWJInvesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF0 0 0 -
Is CAFG or RWJ More Risky?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.419%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAFG or RWJ?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.33%. Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAFG or RWJ?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- RWJInvesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAFG or RZG?
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF-- -- -- RZGInvesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CAFG or RZG?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF, analysts believe Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF0 0 0 RZGInvesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is CAFG or RZG More Risky?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF has a beta of 1.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.03%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAFG or RZG?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.33%. Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAFG or RZG?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- RZGInvesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAFG or XSMO?
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF-- -- -- XSMOInvesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CAFG or XSMO?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF, analysts believe Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF0 0 0 XSMOInvesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF0 0 0 -
Is CAFG or XSMO More Risky?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF has a beta of 1.049, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.867%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAFG or XSMO?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.33%. Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAFG or XSMO?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAFGPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- XSMOInvesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did AMD Stock Go Up?
Since January 9th, shares of chipmaker AMD (NASDAQ:AMD) have been…
Will Data Centers Be In Space?
With demand for data centers seemingly growing by the day,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Sell
47
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
56
INTC alert for Jan 24
Intel Corp. [INTC] is down 17.01% over the past day.
Buy
64
BNR alert for Jan 24
Burning Rock Biotech Ltd. [BNR] is down 12.81% over the past day.
Sell
19
APGE alert for Jan 24
Apogee Therapeutics, Inc. [APGE] is down 12.28% over the past day.
