Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Sell
31
PAMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$46.95
Seasonality move
:
7.46%
Day range:
$46.56 - $47.21
52-week range:
$36.50 - $50.90
Dividend yield:
0.72%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3.1K
Avg. volume:
7.4K
1-year change:
26.74%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSCS
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
$46.67 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0.72% | -- |
|
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
|
$83.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0% | -- |
|
FSCS
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF
|
$35.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 1.12% | -- |
|
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
|
$62.36 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 1.33% | -- |
|
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
|
$570.23 | -- | -- | -- | $2.08 | 1.18% | -- |
|
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
|
$54.95 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 1.38% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | 1.434 | -- | -- |
|
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
|
-- | 0.970 | -- | -- |
|
FSCS
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | 1.177 | -- | -- |
|
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
|
-- | 1.268 | -- | -- |
|
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
|
-- | 1.278 | -- | -- |
|
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
|
-- | 1.269 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSCS
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PAMC or CSD?
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- CSDInvesco S&P Spin-Off ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PAMC or CSD?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 CSDInvesco S&P Spin-Off ETF0 0 0 -
Is PAMC or CSD More Risky?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF has a beta of 1.340, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.97%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAMC or CSD?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PAMC or CSD?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- CSDInvesco S&P Spin-Off ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PAMC or FSCS?
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- FSCSFirst Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PAMC or FSCS?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 FSCSFirst Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF0 0 0 -
Is PAMC or FSCS More Risky?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF has a beta of 1.144, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.411%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAMC or FSCS?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PAMC or FSCS?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- FSCSFirst Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PAMC or IJH?
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PAMC or IJH?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is PAMC or IJH More Risky?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.578%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAMC or IJH?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PAMC or IJH?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PAMC or MDY?
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- MDYSPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PAMC or MDY?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 MDYSPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF0 0 0 -
Is PAMC or MDY More Risky?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF has a beta of 1.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.342%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAMC or MDY?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.08 per share. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PAMC or MDY?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- MDYSPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PAMC or SPMD?
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- SPMDSPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PAMC or SPMD?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF, analysts believe Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is more attractive than SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF0 0 0 SPMDSPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is PAMC or SPMD More Risky?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF has a beta of 1.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.325%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAMC or SPMD?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PAMC or SPMD?
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF-- -- -- -- SPMDSPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Sell
40
MSTR alert for Dec 24
MicroStrategy [MSTR] is up 7% over the past day.
Sell
26
NUTX alert for Dec 24
Nutex Health [NUTX] is up 0.85% over the past day.
Sell
48
VRNA alert for Dec 24
Verona Pharma PLC [VRNA] is down 0.57% over the past day.
