BEEM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AXT has a net margin of 11.3% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -12.42%. Beam Global's return on equity of -24.79% beat AXT's return on equity of -3.81%.

Beam Global has a consensus price target of $8.60, signalling upside risk potential of 124%. On the other hand AXT has an analysts' consensus of $5.20 which suggests that it could grow by 131.11%. Given that AXT has higher upside potential than Beam Global, analysts believe AXT is more attractive than Beam Global.

Beam Global has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AXT has a beta of 2.098, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.795%.

Beam Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AXT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Beam Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AXT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Beam Global quarterly revenues are $11.5M, which are smaller than AXT quarterly revenues of $23.6M. Beam Global's net income of $1.3M is higher than AXT's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Beam Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AXT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beam Global is 0.89x versus 1.02x for AXT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Entegris has a net margin of 11.3% compared to Beam Global's net margin of 9.61%. Beam Global's return on equity of -24.79% beat Entegris's return on equity of 6.6%.

Beam Global has a consensus price target of $8.60, signalling upside risk potential of 124%. On the other hand Entegris has an analysts' consensus of $130.12 which suggests that it could grow by 26.93%. Given that Beam Global has higher upside potential than Entegris, analysts believe Beam Global is more attractive than Entegris.

Beam Global has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entegris has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.127%.

Beam Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Entegris offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Beam Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris pays out 33.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Beam Global quarterly revenues are $11.5M, which are smaller than Entegris quarterly revenues of $807.7M. Beam Global's net income of $1.3M is lower than Entegris's net income of $77.6M. Notably, Beam Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Entegris's PE ratio is 67.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beam Global is 0.89x versus 4.85x for Entegris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FormFactor has a net margin of 11.3% compared to Beam Global's net margin of 9.01%. Beam Global's return on equity of -24.79% beat FormFactor's return on equity of 14.83%.

Beam Global has a consensus price target of $8.60, signalling upside risk potential of 124%. On the other hand FormFactor has an analysts' consensus of $53.56 which suggests that it could grow by 16.12%. Given that Beam Global has higher upside potential than FormFactor, analysts believe Beam Global is more attractive than FormFactor.

Beam Global has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FormFactor has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.876%.

Beam Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FormFactor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Beam Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FormFactor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Beam Global quarterly revenues are $11.5M, which are smaller than FormFactor quarterly revenues of $207.9M. Beam Global's net income of $1.3M is lower than FormFactor's net income of $18.7M. Notably, Beam Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FormFactor's PE ratio is 26.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beam Global is 0.89x versus 4.89x for FormFactor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of 11.3% compared to Beam Global's net margin of 1.64%. Beam Global's return on equity of -24.79% beat inTest's return on equity of 2.9%.

Beam Global has a consensus price target of $8.60, signalling upside risk potential of 124%. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $11.50 which suggests that it could grow by 21.05%. Given that Beam Global has higher upside potential than inTest, analysts believe Beam Global is more attractive than inTest.

Beam Global has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.848, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.848%.

Beam Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Beam Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Beam Global quarterly revenues are $11.5M, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $30.3M. Beam Global's net income of $1.3M is higher than inTest's net income of $495K. Notably, Beam Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 43.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beam Global is 0.89x versus 0.95x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.