BCAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has a net margin of -5332.11% compared to Femto Technologies's net margin of -155.02%. Femto Technologies's return on equity of -255.31% beat A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions's return on equity of -42198.63%.

Femto Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 529.37%. Given that A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has higher upside potential than Femto Technologies, analysts believe A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions is more attractive than Femto Technologies.

Femto Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Femto Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Femto Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Femto Technologies quarterly revenues are $74.5K, which are smaller than A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Femto Technologies's net income of -$4M is lower than A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Femto Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Femto Technologies is 3.21x versus 19.92x for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Earth Life Sciences has a net margin of -5332.11% compared to Femto Technologies's net margin of --. Femto Technologies's return on equity of -255.31% beat Earth Life Sciences's return on equity of --.

Femto Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Earth Life Sciences has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Femto Technologies has higher upside potential than Earth Life Sciences, analysts believe Femto Technologies is more attractive than Earth Life Sciences.

Femto Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Earth Life Sciences has a beta of -0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.88%.

Femto Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Earth Life Sciences offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Femto Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Earth Life Sciences pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Femto Technologies quarterly revenues are $74.5K, which are larger than Earth Life Sciences quarterly revenues of --. Femto Technologies's net income of -$4M is higher than Earth Life Sciences's net income of --. Notably, Femto Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Earth Life Sciences's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Femto Technologies is 3.21x versus -- for Earth Life Sciences. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Two Hands has a net margin of -5332.11% compared to Femto Technologies's net margin of -185.58%. Femto Technologies's return on equity of -255.31% beat Two Hands's return on equity of --.

Femto Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Two Hands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Femto Technologies has higher upside potential than Two Hands, analysts believe Femto Technologies is more attractive than Two Hands.

Femto Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Two Hands has a beta of -2.375, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 337.542%.

Femto Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Two Hands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Femto Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Two Hands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Femto Technologies quarterly revenues are $74.5K, which are smaller than Two Hands quarterly revenues of $179.5K. Femto Technologies's net income of -$4M is lower than Two Hands's net income of -$333.1K. Notably, Femto Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Two Hands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Femto Technologies is 3.21x versus 0.07x for Two Hands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZenaTech has a net margin of -5332.11% compared to Femto Technologies's net margin of -209.85%. Femto Technologies's return on equity of -255.31% beat ZenaTech's return on equity of -9.1%.

Femto Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ZenaTech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Femto Technologies has higher upside potential than ZenaTech, analysts believe Femto Technologies is more attractive than ZenaTech.

Femto Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZenaTech has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Femto Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZenaTech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Femto Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZenaTech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Femto Technologies quarterly revenues are $74.5K, which are smaller than ZenaTech quarterly revenues of $240.3K. Femto Technologies's net income of -$4M is lower than ZenaTech's net income of -$504.2K. Notably, Femto Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ZenaTech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Femto Technologies is 3.21x versus 478.37x for ZenaTech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.